Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03207711

Delish Study: Diabetes Education to Lower Insulin, Sugars, and Hunger

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is the most expensive chronic disease in the U.S.

Lifestyle modification is central to T2DM management, but long-term adherence to dietary recommendations is difficult. A key challenge is the difficulty of coping with cravings for high carbohydrate or sugar-laden foods in an environment where these foods are tempting and widely available. One mechanism by which mindfulness may increase long-term dietary adherence is by better equipping individuals with skills to experience food cravings and difficult emotions without eating in response. Such approaches seek to strengthen abilities to be non-judgmentally aware of, tolerate, and respond skillfully to food cravings and difficult emotions without reacting impulsively or maladaptively. The investigators hypothesize that improved ability to manage food cravings and emotional eating is a key mechanism through which mindfulness-enhancements can improve dietary adherence. The study will test a mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) for improving dietary adherence. Although the particular diet employed is not the focus of this study, the study will use a diet with about 10% of calories from carbohydrate as: (1) it induces a low level of ketone production, which will be used as a biomarker for dietary adherence; (2) prior studies suggest it improves metabolic parameters in T2DM, including glycemic control.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

UCSF Osher Center for Integrative Medicine

San Francisco, California, 94143, United States

About this study

The study will use ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods to measure eating in response to difficult emotions and/or food cravings. In the R61 phase, the team will ensure this measure is appropriate for further testing and assess the impact of the MBI components on our hypothesized behavioral mechanisms in N=60 persons with T2DM. The study plans 3 waves of 20 persons each with 12 weekly sessions. All participants will attend an in-person group course providing education on basic behavioral strategies for diet and physical activity. Participants will be randomized to receive this education alone (Ed) or this same material with added MBI components (Ed+MBI). The team will also pilot test two levels of intensity of maintenance phase intervention (monthly group meetings alone or supplemented by individualized attention) to prepare them for R33 testing. the investigators plan an R33 phase trial in which 120 persons with T2DM will be randomized (using a 1:2 ratio) to Ed or Ed+MBI conditions and followed for 12 months, including a 9-month maintenance phase. The study will test the robustness of the effect of MBI components on our proposed behavioral mechanisms, and on dietary adherence, as well as preliminary effect sizes on weight and glycemic control. The study will use an innovative adaptive intervention design to optimize maintenance phase intensity, which the investigators believe may be key to augment the MBI effects. The R33 phase will be registered and reported in a separate clinicaltrials.gov record.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • History of T2DM mellitus. If taking insulin, screening labs will include C-Peptide to rule out T1DM.
  • HbA1c >= 6.5% and < 12.0% at screening.
  • Experience food-related cravings most days of the week and eat in response to these cravings regularly.
  • Aged 18 years old and older.
  • Able to engage in light physical activity.
  • Willing and able to participate in the interventions. Must be interested in following a carbohydrate- restricted diet, willing to learn about mindful eating and behavioral strategies for following prescribed diets, have sufficient control over their food intake so that they can follow either diet, and otherwise be able and willing to participate in the intervention. Intervention content must be practiced to evaluate whether it is effective.
  • Have smartphone and are willing to use it on a regular basis for data collection.
  • Ability to speak English.

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable to provide informed consent.
  • A substance abuse, mental health, or medical condition that, in the opinion of investigators, will make it difficult for the potential participant to participate in the intervention or that may need immediate changes in medical management that will affect study outcome measures. Such conditions may include cancer, liver failure, renal failure, untreated hypo or hyperthyroidism, or history of serious bulimia. Some other serious medical conditions that may alter key study outcomes or require other important diet modifications, including untreated hypothyroidism, renal failure, cirrhosis, and conditions requiring oral or parenteral glucocorticoid treatment.
  • Pregnant or planning to get pregnant in the next 6 months, breastfeeding or less than 6 months post-partum.
  • Current use of weight loss medications, such as Alli or amphetamine-based drugs that may affect weight.
  • Planned weight-loss (bariatric) surgery or bariatric surgery within the past 18 months.
  • Currently enrolled in a weight loss program, such as Weight Watchers or a self-help group such as Overeaters Anonymous, or have unalterable plans to enroll in one of these programs in the next year.
  • Vegan or vegetarian.
  • Unwilling to do home ketone monitoring.

Treatment and study plan

Carbohydrate-restricted diet

Behavioral

Education for carbohydrate-restricted diet

Mindfulness

Behavioral

Mindful eating app-use and instruction

Primary outcomes

  1. Frequency of Eating in Response to Cravings (Primary Mechanistic Outcome)

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 months

    Percent of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) opportunities in which participants reported eating in response to food cravings over a 3 day period. EMA measures were delivered to cell phones 3 times each day. The final EMA measure each day included a second question about whether there were any instances of craving related eating not already reported earlier during the day. Thus there was an opportunity to report eating in response to cravings on 4 different EMA questions each day, a total of 12 potential measures over 3 days. The percent here uses the number of EMA responses received as the denominator.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Impulsivity as Measured by Delayed Discounting Score

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 months

    The 5-trial adaptation of the Delayed Discounting (DD; Koffarnus & Bickel, 2014) is a decision-making exercise where individuals choose between a smaller, immediate reward and a larger, delayed reward. The task measures an individual's "discount rate," or how much they devalue a future reward compared to an immediate one, which is a a key aspect of impulsivity and self-control. Respondents choose between $100 delivered after a delay, or $50 available immediately. To derive estimates of discount rate, we used Mazur's hyperbolic discounting model (V=A/ (1+kD)18, wherein V is the discounted value of the delayed option, A is its objective amount, D is its delay, and k indexes the discount rate. We calculated values of k for each participant as the inverse of the indifference delay (1/ED50). We log transformed these values prior to analysis. Higher values of K indicate greater discounting, which reflects greater impulsivity.

  2. Emotion-related Eating (Secondary Mechanistic Outcome)

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 months

    Change in emotion-related eating as measured by the Coping subscale of the Palatable Eating Motives Scale (PEMS). The Coping subscale is comprised of 4 items rated on a scale from 1 (almost never/never) to 5 (almost always/always), with possible scores ranging from 4-20. Higher scores reflect worse coping/greater emotional eating. Thus, decreases over time reflect improved coping/decreased emotional eating.

  3. Stress-related Eating (Secondary Mechanistic Outcome)

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 months

    Change in stress-related eating as measured by two questions about stress-related eating from the MIDUS study. Possible scores range from 2-8. Higher scores reflect worse outcomes/greater eating in response to stress. Thus, decreases over time reflect improved outcomes/decreased stress-related eating.

  4. Glycemic Control, Using HbA1c

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 months

    Change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to 6 months by study arm

  5. Fasting Glucose

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 months

    Change in plasma fasting glucose from baseline to 6 months by study arm

  6. HOMA-2IR Index of Insulin Resistance (Secondary Clinical Outcome)

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 months

    Insulin resistance estimated from the Homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) model 2 index of insulin resistance. The basic formula is: (glucose × insulin) / 22.5, where glucose is measured in mmol/L and insulin in mU/L. The computer assisted re-calibration in model 2 addresses variations in the glucose resistance of the peripheral tissue and liver, increases in the insulin secretion curve for glucose > 180 mg/dL, and contribution of circulating pro-insulin. Higher values indicate more insulin resistance (worse outcome). The Oxford University HOMA-2IR calculator was used (https://process.innovation.ox.ac.uk/software/p/2112/homa2-calculator/1). HOMA index values < 2.0 are generally considered normal and indicate adequate sensitivity of cells to insulin. HOMA index values between 2.0 and 2.5 may indicate borderline changes in insulin sensitivity. HOMA index values > 2.5 clearly indicate insulin resistance.

  7. Weight Change(Secondary Clinical Outcome)

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 months

    kilograms

  8. Adherence to Diet as Measured by Fingerstick Blood Ketones

    Time frame: 6 months

    Adherence to diet as measured by average proportion of fingerstick blood ketones at or above 0.3 mmol/L at 24 weeks.

  9. Diet Adherence by Mean Grams of Non-fiber Carbohydrate Consumed Per Day

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 months

    Diet Adherence Between Intervention Arms as Measured by Mean Grams of Non-fiber Carbohydrate Consumed Per Day From 24- Hour Diet Recall

  10. Perceived Stress

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 months

    Perceived Stress Scale (PPS-10) total score. Scores can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicated greater perceived stress.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco

Other

Collaborators

  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

Registry information

Official study title

Optimizing Lifestyle Interventions With Mindfulness-based Strategies in Type 2 Diabetes

Acronym: Delish

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Jul 5, 2017
Registry last updated
Dec 8, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.