Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, 10032, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Jeffrey Ruhl, MS
CONTACT
Michelle Castillo, BS
CONTACT
Pierre A Elias, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07197736
Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States, and echocardiography (or "echo") is the most common way doctors look at the heart. Echo is safe, painless, and can detect major heart problems, including weak heart pumping and valve disease.
Valve disease, especially aortic stenosis (narrowing) and mitral regurgitation (leakage), is common in older adults but often goes undiagnosed. While echo is the main tool for finding valve problems, it takes time, requires expert training, and results can vary between readers.
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), especially deep learning (DL), have shown promise in automatically analyzing heart images. However, past research hasn't fully tackled key echo techniques-like color Doppler and spectral Doppler-that are crucial for measuring how blood moves through heart valves. AI tools also face challenges in being used in everyday medical practice because of workflow issues, lack of real-world testing, and concerns about how the algorithms make decisions.
At Columbia University Irving Medical Center, researchers have built a large database of heart tests over the last six years and developed AI programs to analyze echocardiograms. The current study will test whether providing AI analysis to cardiologists in real time during echo reading can make the process faster and more consistent.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
New York, 10032, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Jeffrey Ruhl, MS
CONTACT
Michelle Castillo, BS
CONTACT
Pierre A Elias, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
In a prior Columbia University study, a series of deep learning algorithms analyzing echocardiograms is in development. These algorithms include, but are not limited to, algorithms that enable view classification, structure identification, left ventricle (LV) dimension measurements, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) determination, left atrium (LA) volume assessments, and valvular heart disease diagnosis. Briefly, these algorithms are based on architectures shown to be useful in image and video analysis, including ones specific to echocardiography interpretation. Algorithms based off these architectures can be generalized to interpretation of video-based echocardiogram data such as valvular regurgitation assessment. As part of this study protocol, these models will continue to be developed using patient echocardiogram data. This study aims to create an automated, end-to-end system that can deliver deep learning analyses of echocardiograms to the interpreting cardiologist in real-time. If successful, this program could enable improvements in echocardiography reading efficiency and reliability.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 18 months
Proportion of cases where the expert panel reclassifies valvular regurgitation severity by at least one grade (upgrade or downgrade). The proportion will be calculated as the number of cases with reclassification ÷ total number of cases reviewed.
Time frame: 18 months
The proportion will be calculated as the number of cases with any management change ÷ total number of cases reviewed.
Time frame: 18 months
Definition: The proportion will be calculated as the number of cases referred to a valve specialist or surgeon ÷ total number of cases reviewed.
Time frame: 18 months
The proportion will be calculated as the number of cases with a change in recommended follow-up echocardiography frequency ÷ total number of cases reviewed.
Time frame: 18 months
The proportion will be calculated as the number of cases referred for further testing with TEE or cardiac MRI ÷ total number of cases reviewed.
Time frame: 18 months
Proportion of cases where AI classification agrees with expert panel review of valvular regurgitation severity.
Time frame: 18 months
Proportion of cases where cardiologist clinical interpretation agrees with expert panel review of valvular regurgitation severity.
Time frame: 18 months
Difference between the concordance rate of AI vs panel review and the concordance rate of cardiologist clinical read vs panel review.
Time frame: 18 months
Agreement between independent cardiologist readers for categorical variables (e.g., severity of valvular regurgitation) will be quantified using Cohen's kappa statistic.
Time frame: 18 months
Agreement between independent cardiologist readers for continuous measures (e.g., left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] category) will be quantified using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Heidi S Hartman, MD
CONTACT
Michelle Castillo, BS
CONTACT
Columbia University
Other
Deep Learning for Echo Analysis, Tracking, and Evaluation Prospective Evaluation (DELINEATE-Prospective)
Acronym: DELINEATE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05714293
Aortic Regurgitation, Aortic Stenosis, Severe
Roma, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06449469
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Aarhus, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT06387446
Aortic Valve Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06079008
Amputation, Aortic Valve Disease
View Trial Details