Kafrelsheikh University
Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafrelsheikh, 33516, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT07410871
This study aimed to compare clinical results of decompression alone using minimal invasive unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression versus classical decompression and instrumentation and fusion.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafrelsheikh, 33516, Egypt
The term "lumbar spinal stenosis" (LSS) describes the anatomical narrowing of the spinal canal, which occurs in older people because of spinal ageing.
Initial treatment is usually medical. Surgical management is recommended for patients with failed non-surgical trials. As claudication is always the main complain, lumbar canal decompression is the traditional surgical treatment.
Although adding instrumentation and fusion is not uncommon and widely used. In the literature, the benefit of fusion, is treating instability that causes degenerative spondylolisthesis, improve back pain if present, and avoid slippage progression, which possibly will occur with generous decompression and disruption of the posterior column.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients underwent unilateral laminotomy decompression.
Patients underwent a posterior decompression, (either with or without preservation of midline bands) was followed by instrumentation using pedicle screws with rods and intervertebral fusion device.
Time frame: 14 months after the procedure
Low back pain was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 10-question self-report questionnaire to measure functional disability and quality of life. It yields a percentage score from 0% (no disability) to 100% (severe disability).
Time frame: 14 months after the procedure
Each patient was instructed about leg pain assessment with the numeric rating scale (NRS) score. NRS (0 represents "no pain" while 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable").
Time frame: 14 months after the procedure
Incidence of complications were recorded.
Kafrelsheikh University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03733626
Bone Diseases, Degenerative Disc Disease
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05114135
Bone Diseases, Degenerative Disc Disease
Budapest, Hungary
View Trial DetailsNCT03012776
Bone Diseases, Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
Glendale, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07644507
Bone Diseases, Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases
Wroclaw, Poland
View Trial Details