Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04904367

Deep Tissue Massage in the Myofascial Pain Syndrome

This study aims to examine the effect of deep tissue massage (DTM) on myofascial trigger point (MTrP) number, neck range of motion (ROM), pain, disability and quality of life in patients with Myofacial pain syndrome (MPS).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Mus Alparslan University

Muş, Güzeltepe District, 49100, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

A total of 88 patients with MPS were screened for eligibility. Of these patients, 80 who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into two groups using randomization with computer-generated random numbers as the control group (n=40) and DTM group (n=40).

The patients were evaluated at baseline (Day 0), and the end of treatment (Week 4).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being over the age of 18
  • Have at least one active trigger point
  • Have not previously undergone local injectable anesthetic blockage or acupuncture,
  • Complaining of pain for the last three months
  • Getting a diagnosis of MPS

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with infectious skin disease,
  • Using analgesic and antidepressant medication,
  • A history of major trauma or surgical intervention,
  • Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≤ 24 according

Treatment and study plan

Deep tissue massage

Procedure

The amount of pressure during the massage was adjusted by the physiotherapist with reference to muscle tissue palpation in the patients. During the massage, olecranon, pisiform bone protrusion, metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joint faces forearm, wrist and fingers were used during the massage to reach deep tissue. As a massage technique, compression and stretching techniques are used in combination.

Conventional physiotherapy

Procedure

For 4 weeks 20 session, this group were applied hot pack with 20 minutes of conventional TENS to back and neck region, followed by 4 minutes of ultrasound at a frequency of 3 MHz and at a dosage of 1 w / cm2.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in neck pain on the 10-point Visual Analog Scale(VAS) at 4 week

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 week

    The severity of neck pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) consists of scores from 0 to 10 in a horizontal line of 10 cm. Patients are asked to mark a place on the scale according to the pain they feel. Increased VAS scores indicate increased pain.

  2. Change from baseline in quality of life on the 36-point Short-Form 36(SF-36) at 4 week

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 week

    Short form-36 (SF-36) was used to determine the quality of life. SF-36, which has a generic scale feature and provides wide angle measurement among the quality of life scales; Ware et al. It was developed and put into use in 1993. The scale includes items including perception of change in health in the last four weeks and perception of change in health in the last week. SF-36 Turkish validity and reliability study has been done. While the increase in the score negatively affects the body pain, physical and emotional role, it positively affects the parameters of physical function, vitality/energy, general health, mental health and social functioning.

  3. Change from baseline in disability on the 20-point at 4 week Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) at 4 week

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 week

    The Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) was used for the assessment of disability. This scale was developed by Wheeler et al. NPDS is a 20-item questionnaire developed using VAS as a template. The questions investigate the intensity of pain and its interaction with professional, recreational and functional aspects of life, and the presence and extent of emotional factors related to these. The scoring of each question varies between 0-5. The range of points people can get varies between 0-100. High score values indicate severe disability in patients. NPDS is an index has Turkish reliability and validity, consisting of 20 questions and each question scored between 0 and 5. Increased NPDS scores indicate increased disability.

  4. Change from baseline in range of motion on the universal goniometer at 4 week

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 week

    A universal goniometer was used to evaluate the active neck range of motion (ROM) of the patients. The universal goniometer consists of a pivot point and two arms, fixed and movable. The fixed arm is kept fixed to the immobile part of the extremity or to the floor or body where the measurement is made. The movable arm is the arm that follows and makes the measurement throughout the movement of the measured joint. During our measurement, we chose the pivot point to be the acromion, the earlobe alignment for the movable arm and the fixed arm to be parallel to the ground.

  5. Change from baseline in number of trigger points on the manual palpation at 4 week

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 week

    Manual palpation of the trapezius and levator scapula muscles was performed by a trained physiotherapist in this field to assess the presence of MTrP. Palpation always bilateral was performed with the third and second fingers of each hand with a pressure of no more than 4 kg, which is the conventional approach for detecting tender and trigger points. We considered the pressure of more than 4 kg as whitening of the nail.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ömer Bingölbali

Other

Collaborators

  • Muş Alparslan University

Registry information

Official study title

The Effectiveness of Deep Tissue Massage on Pain, Trigger Point, Disability, Range of Motion and Quality of Life in Individuals With Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
May 27, 2021
Registry last updated
Sep 29, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.