Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05690178

Deep Tissue Massage in Office Workers With Chronic Low Back Pain

The main objective of the study was to assess the impact of deep tissue massage on subjective and objective parameters in a group of office workers with chronic low back pain.

Specific objectives:

* Assessment of the impact of deep tissue massage on the level of pain * Assessment of the impact of deep tissue massage on the level of disability * Assessment of the impact of deep tissue massage on the mobility of the lumbar spine * Assessment of the effect of deep tissue massage on the discomfort threshold of tissue compression in the area of the erector spinae muscle * Assessment of the impact of deep tissue massage on the biophysical parameters of the soft tissues of the erector spinae muscle * Evaluation of the impact of deep tissue massage on the bioelectric potentials of the erector spinae muscle during everyday activities and the flexion-relaxation test

Hypotheses:

* Deep tissue massage will reduce the level of pain in the lumbar spine * Deep tissue massage will reduce the level of disability * Deep tissue massage will increase the range of motion of the lumbar spine in all directions * Deep tissue massage will reduce the threshold of discomfort when compressing the soft tissues of the erector spinae muscle * Deep tissue massage will reduce muscle tone and stiffness and increase the elasticity of the back extensor muscle * Deep tissue massage will increase the bioelectrical potentials of the erector spinae muscle while performing tests of activities of daily living * Deep tissue massage will reduce the value of the flexion-relaxation test

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Chronic Low-back Pain

Age range

30 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Poznan University of Physical Education, Department of Biology and Anatomy

Poznan, Wielkopolska, 61-871, Poland

About this study

Deep tissue massage is a manual action of the therapist in the superficial and deep layers of muscles and fascia in order to relax, change abnormal patterns, eliminate tension and pain in a maximally ergonomic way. Deep tissue massage should be described as an independent method of therapy using a specific set of techniques and principles. It is a safe method with a wide range of applications, while the techniques themselves can be modified to the needs of the patient. It is believed that deep tissue massage causes: improvement of tissue blood supply, reduction of muscle tension, stretching of muscles and fascia, improvement of muscle and joint function.

Participants A total of 40 patients (30 to 60 years of age) participated in the study. All participants were characterized by the presence of chronic low back pain syndrome, performed office work for 8 hours a day and were characterized by moderate physical activity. Using randomization, participants were divided into two groups (experimental and control). The experimental group included participants who received deep tissue massage (N=20, 18 women and 2 men, average age: 40). The control group included participants who did not receive therapy (N=20, 13 women and 7 men, average age: 43).

Intervention The deep tissue massage lasted 45 minutes. The entire therapy included 4 treatments over a period of 2 weeks. The interval between treatments was 3 days. The conducted therapy included techniques for: quadratus lumborum muscle, erector spinae muscle, thoracolumbar fascia, iliopsoas muscle. All techniques were performed on both sides of the patient's body.

Research methods

The following measurement equipment was used to collect the data:

  • Electrogoniometer. Penny & Giles strain gauge electrogoniometer with two sensors (SG150 - two-axis, Q110 - single-axis). Measurements were taken in a standing position, in accordance with the measurement methodology according to Lewandowsky. All movements of the lumbar spine (forward bending, backward bending, right bending, left bending, right rotation, left rotation) were examined. The average of the three measurements was the result of movability for a given direction. The sensors were attached to the skin using Biometrics double-sided tape. The upper sensor was placed on the Th12 spinous process (lower edge of the sensor), while the lower sensor was mounted on the base of the sacrum (upper edge).
  • Algometer. The Wagner Instruments algometer was used to assess the subjective parameter, i.e. the first discomfort threshold. In the study, the measurement site was the point located on the longissimus muscle, which is a component of the erector spinae muscle. The subjects lay in front. The pressure, detected by the algometer sensor, was applied from above and perpendicularly to the examined muscle (two fingers laterally from the L1 spinous process). Three measurements were made alternately for both sides of the examined muscle. From these measurements, mean values were calculated, which were the results for the right and left sides of the examined muscle.
  • MyotonPRO. In order to study the biophysical parameters of soft tissues, i.e. muscle tone (F) [Hz], stiffness (S) [N/m] and elasticity (D) [no units], the MyotonPRO apparatus was used. During the measurements, the tested person lay on his front. Measurements were made on the longissimus muscle (2 fingers lateral to the L1 spinous process). The pattern composer was programmed as follows: tapping time: 15 ms, interval: 0.8 s, mode: multiscan (5 repetitions). Measurements were made on the right and left muscles.
  • Kinesiologic electromyography (EMG). Kinesiologic electromyography was carried out with an 8-channel electromyographic system with plate electrodes (model W4X8, Biometrics Ltd). The results were recorded using DataLog Bluetooth V7.5 software (Biometrics Ltd). During the examination, six multiple-use surface electrodes (type SX230 1000) were attached with an adhesive tape, after removal of body hair froma 2 cm x 1 cm area of intact skin, disinfection of electrode surface, and wiping the skin a few times with salicylic alcohol to reduce its resistance. The reference electrode (type R230, Biometrics Ltd) was fixed at the distal end of the radius (Lister's tubercle region) with an elastic band. The examination involved lumbar segment of the longissimus muscle, iliocostalis and multifidus (both right- and left-sided bundles). The electrodes were placed according to the international guidelines published by SENIAM. The examination was painless and noninvasive and did not require subject's exposure to any additional electric stimulation. The measurement was preceded by a 10-min warm-up of the keymuscle groups. The list of determined electromyographic parameters included the amplitude of bioelectrical signal from the longissimus, iliocostalis and multifidus muscles, expressed in microvolt. Avoiding a confounding effect associated with measurement conditions, the results were normalized to a reference Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC) and expressed in percent. After fixation of the electrodes and preparation of the system, MVC of the longissimus, iliocostalis and multifidus were determined according to the international SENIAM guidelines. The examination started with the subject lying down in a prone position, with arms crossed under the chin, and extended legs. The EMG recordings were obtained during three active extensions of the spine, each lasting 3 seconds, with 30-second intervals in between. MVCs , corresponding to 100% neuromuscular activation of the muscles, was calculated as the mean amplitude for the three repetitions (for each muscle). At the beginning, the Flexion-Relaxation (FR) test was performed. The participant performed forward flexion of the spine and hung freely in this position for 10 seconds. During this test, the participant was asked to be as relaxed as possible. Then the participant was tested during successive tests of activities of daily living: getting up from a chair, sitting on it, lifting and lowering a 1 kg and 2 kg weight. Each test was run at an individually adjusted pace and consisted of three repetitions with 30-second rests between them. The test started at the investigator's request. While lifting and lowering the weights, the subjects kept a straight back, and each hold of the weight lasted 3 seconds and was performed on straight elbows. The result of each test is presented as the mean amplitude for three repetitions for each muscle. The results were normalized to the MVC to assess the degree of muscle involvement during various activities (standing up, sitting down, raising and lowering the roller) in relation to maximal neuromuscular activation. To ensure accurate results, the correct attachment of each electrode was rechecked before each repetition.
  • Revised Oswestry Pain Questionnaire (ODI). The degree of LBP imposed limitations in activity of daily ling (ADLs) was determined with Revised Oswestry Pain Questionnaire, also referred to as Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The survey consisted of 10 questions, each with 6 possible responses scored from 0 to 5 points. If the respondent chose more than one answer to a given question, the one with higher score was recorded and subjected to the analysis. Maximum overall score amounted to 50 points, which corresponded to 100% disability due to lumbar pain.
  • Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). The instrument consists of 24 statements about pain and its influence on ADLs. The respondent chooses only the statements that refer to his/her ailments. Maximum overall score may vary between 0 and 24 points.
  • Visual-Analog Scale (VAS). This subjective tool is used to assess the level of pain. The participant marks the level of pain on a 10 cm scale, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the maximum pain he has ever felt.

In order to assess the impact of deep tissue massage therapy on the study population, two measurements were made over time: before and after therapy.

Ethics All measurement methods used were non-invasive and safe for health. The study was approved by the local Bioethics Committee. Each participant had the right to withdraw from the study at any stage. All collected data is anonymous and will be used only to conduct statistical analyzes for scientific purposes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic Low-Back Pain
  • office worker

Exclusion criteria

  • spine surgeries
  • cauda equina syndrome
  • cancer
  • pain or motor and sensory deficits in the lower extremities below the level of the knee
  • various therapies to treat chronic low-back pain

Treatment and study plan

Deep Tissue Massage

Other

The Deep Tissue Massage lasted 45 minutes. The entire therapy included 4 treatments over a period of 2 weeks. The interval between treatments was 3 days. The conducted therapy included techniques for: quadratus lumborum muscle, erector spinae muscle, thoracolumbar fascia, iliopsoas muscle. All techniques were performed on both sides of the patient's body.

Primary outcomes

  1. Lumbar anterior flexion (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy

  2. Lumbar anterior flexion (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy

  3. Lumbar posterior flexion (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy

  4. Lumbar posterior flexion (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy

  5. Lumbar right flexion (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy

  6. Lumbar right flexion (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy

  7. Lumbar left flexion (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy

  8. Lumbar left flexion (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy

  9. Lumbar right rotation (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy

  10. Lumbar right rotation (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy

  11. Lumbar left rotation (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy

  12. Lumbar left rotation (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy

  13. Stiffness (S) of the right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the intervention

  14. Stiffness (S) of the right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy

  15. Stiffness (S) of the left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the therapy

  16. Stiffness (S) of the left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy

  17. Elasticity (D) of the right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the therapy

  18. Elasticity (D) of the right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy

  19. Elasticity (D) of the left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the therapy

  20. Elasticity (D) of the left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy

  21. Muscle tone (F) of the right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the therapy

  22. Muscle tone (F) of the right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy

  23. Muscle tone (F) of the left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the therapy

  24. Muscle tone (F) of the left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy

  25. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Examination of the first discomfort threshold using an algometer the day before the therapy

  26. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Examination of the first discomfort threshold using an algometer the day after the therapy

  27. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Examination of the first discomfort threshold using an algometer the day before the therapy

  28. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Examination of the first discomfort threshold using an algometer the day after the therapy

  29. EMG - MVC for right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the right longissimus muscle the day before therapy

  30. EMG - MVC for right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the right longissimus muscle the day after the therapy

  31. EMG - MVC for left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left longissimus muscle the day before the therapy

  32. EMG - MVC for left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left longissimus muscle the day after the therapy

  33. EMG - MVC for right iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left longissimus muscle the day before the therapy

  34. EMG - MVC for right iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the right iliocostalis muscle the day after the therapy

  35. EMG - MVC for left iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left longissimus muscle the day before the therapy

  36. EMG - MVC for left iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left longissimus muscle the day after the therapy

  37. EMG - MVC for right multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the right multifidus muscle the day before the therapy

  38. EMG - MVC for right multifidus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the right multifidus muscle the day after the therapy

  39. EMG - MVC for left multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left multifidus muscle the day before the therapy

  40. EMG - MVC for left multifidus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left multifidus muscle the day after the therapy

  41. EMG - FR test for right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy

  42. EMG - FR test for right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy

  43. EMG - FR test for left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy

  44. EMG - FR test for left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy

  45. EMG - FR test for right iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy

  46. EMG - FR test for right iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy

  47. EMG - FR test for left iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy

  48. EMG - FR test for left iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy

  49. EMG - FR test for right multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy

  50. EMG - FR test for right multifidus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy

  51. EMG - FR test for left multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy

  52. EMG - FR test for left multifidus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy

  53. EMG - sitting and standing test for right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy

  54. EMG - sitting and standing test for right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy

  55. EMG - sitting and standing test for left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy

  56. EMG - sitting and standing test for left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy

  57. EMG - sitting and standing test for right iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy

  58. EMG - sitting and standing test for right iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy

  59. EMG - sitting and standing test for left iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy

  60. EMG - sitting and standing test for left iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy

  61. EMG - sitting and standing test for right multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy

  62. EMG - sitting and standing test for right multifidus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy

  63. EMG - sitting and standing test for left multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy

  64. EMG - sitting and standing test for left multifidus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy

  65. EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

  66. EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

  67. EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

  68. EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

  69. EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

  70. EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

  71. EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

  72. EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

  73. EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

  74. EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right multifidus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

  75. EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

  76. EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left multifidus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

  77. EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

  78. EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

  79. EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

  80. EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

  81. EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

  82. EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

  83. EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

  84. EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

  85. EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

  86. EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right multifidus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

  87. EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

  88. EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left multifidus muscle (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

  89. Revised Oswestry Pain Questionnaire (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Revised Oswestry Pain Questionnaire (ODI) - the day before therapy. The minimum score is 0, while the maximum is 50, which proves 100% disability. A higher result is worse and proves the patient's disability in everyday activities.

  90. Revised Oswestry Pain Questionnaire (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Revised Oswestry Pain Questionnaire (ODI) - the day after therapy. The minimum score is 0, while the maximum is 50, which proves 100% disability. A higher result is worse and proves the patient's disability in everyday activities.

  91. Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) - the day before therapy. The minimum score is 0, while the maximum is 24. The higher the score, the worse it is and it illustrates the poor functional condition of the examined person.

  92. Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) - the day after therapy. The minimum score is 0, while the maximum is 24. The higher the score, the worse it is and it illustrates the poor functional condition of the examined person.

  93. Visual-Analog Scale (PRE)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Visual-Analog Scale (VAS) - the day before therapy. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 10. The higher the score, the worse it is and it reflects the subjective level of pain experienced.

  94. Visual-Analog Scale (POST)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

    Visual-Analog Scale (VAS) - the day after therapy. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 10. The higher the score, the worse it is and it reflects the subjective level of pain experienced.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Poznan University of Physical Education

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effect of Deep Tissue Massage on Subjective and Objective Parameters in Office Workers With Chronic Low Back Pain

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jan 19, 2023
Registry last updated
Aug 9, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.