Aminolevulinic Acid
DrugA 0,25mm-thick layer of BF-200 ALA (aminolevulinic acid, Ameluz®) light sensitizer gel is applied on one randomized treatment side of face.
Other names: BF-200 ALA, Ameluz®
NCT Number: NCT02464709
This study compares two photosensitizing creams' BF-200 ALA's (aminolevulinic acid, Ameluz®) and MAL's (methyl 5-aminolevulinate, Metvix®) efficacy on actinic keratoses in natural daylight photodynamic therapy (NDL-PDT). The participants' facial skin or scalp will be randomized in two sides and one side is treated with BF-200 ALA and the other side with MAL. Result of the treatment is assessed with clinical examination 12 months after treatment. The investigators will also compare delayed skin reactions after treatment and cost-effectiveness of both photosensitizer creams.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a widely used method in dermatology clinics for treatment of superficial skin cancers and premalignant lesions. Actinic keratoses (AKs) are premalignant skin lesions which develop due to long-lasting sun exposure and in time can progress into squamocellular skin cancer if left untreated. The incidence of AKs and skin cancers is rapidly booming as the elderly population increases in western countries. It is crucial to treat AKs early and effectively considering their tendency to progress into malign cancer. The current general consensus for treating AKs is to treat large sun-damaged skin areas simultaneously instead of separate AK lesions. Term "skin field cancerization" refers to presence of different degrees of visible and invisible dysplastic changes in widely sun-damaged skin. Natural daylight mediated photodynamic therapy (NDL-PDT) is a well-suited method for treating large field-cancerized skin areas.
In PDT a photosensitizing cream is applied on the skin and let to absorb. After absorption to the skin cells the photosensitizer changes into protoporphyrin IX (PpIX). PpIX reacts with visible light causing a phototoxic reaction which destroys cancer cells targetedly. After absorption the skin can be illuminated using a red lamp (conventional PDT) or natural daylight (NDL-PDT) as the absorption spectrum peaks of PpIX are within the visual spectrum of light.
In Finland the approved photosensitizers for PDT are methyl 5-aminolevulinate cream (MAL, Metvix®, Galderma) and aminolevulinic acid gel (BF-200 ALA, Ameluz®, Biofrontera AG). They both have been clinically studied and proved effective in conventional PDT but in NDL-PDT mainly MAL has been in focus of studies. To our knowledge there is only research report concerning the use of BF-200 ALA in NDL-PDT (Neittaanmaki-Perttu et al 2014) which is a study of our own research group. In this study BF-200 ALA appeared to be more effective than MAL.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A 0,25mm-thick layer of BF-200 ALA (aminolevulinic acid, Ameluz®) light sensitizer gel is applied on one randomized treatment side of face.
Other names: BF-200 ALA, Ameluz®
A 0,25mm-thick layer of MAL (methyl 5-aminolevulinate, Metvix®) light sensitizer cream is applied on one randomized treatment side of face.
Other names: MAL, Metvix®
Time frame: 12 months
Participant's AKs in the treatment areas are counted and categorized clinically in three grades I-III (Olsen et al. 1991) before the NDL-PDT treatment. The clinical healing of actinic keratoses will be assessed by a dermatologist 12 months after the treatment.
Time frame: 1 day
Participants will be asked to fill visual analogue scales (VAS) about pain experienced on both treatment sides of the face or scalp. Pain is assessed during the DL-PDT and after the treatment until the evening.
Time frame: 1 week
The participants will come to clinic 5-7 days after treatment and nurse will photograph both treatment sides. Primary treatment reaction of skin will be single-blindedly assessed from the photographs. A dermatologist will assess which side of the face or scalp presents a stronger reaction.
Time frame: 12 months
Researchers will analyze the cost-efficacy of the treatments using decision tree, sensitivity analysis, ICER and QALY-analyses to decide with treatment modality is more preferable. The differences in cost-efficacy will most likely depend on the light sensitizer costs and their efficacy on the treated lesions.
Joint Authority for Päijät-Häme Social and Health Care
Other
Daylight Mediated Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratoses: a Multicentre Study Comparing Two Photosensitizers (BF-200 ALA Versus MAL)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06888362
Actinic Keratosis, Keratosis
Uppsala, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT06027619
Actinic Keratosis, Keratosis
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06319794
Actinic Keratosis, Keratosis
Basel, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT00472459
Actinic Keratosis, Basal Cell Carcinoma
Aarhus, Denmark
View Trial Details