Shared decision-making tool
OtherParticipants will use an interactive web page intended to aid patient decision-making (i.e., a decision aid) while undergoing consultation for atrial fibrillation ablation.
NCT Number: NCT04993807
This study is a single-group feasibility study evaluating decision aid visualizations which display common post-ablation symptom patterns as a tool for shared decision-making. The specific aim of the clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility of putting the visualizations into clinical practice (n=75). The hypothesis is that patients will report low decisional conflict and decision regret and high satisfaction with their decision about whether to undergo an ablation or not.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, United States
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disorder, and nearly 90% of patients experience symptoms such as shortness of breath that directly impair their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Catheter ablation is a minimally invasive, surgical procedure that is routinely performed to treat AF and associated symptoms with the goal of improving HRQOL, but also carries potentially serious risks. Shared decision-making (SDM), in which treatment decisions are aligned based on high quality evidence and patient values and goals of care, is a widely encouraged practice for navigating complex healthcare decisions such as these. However, SDM around rhythm and symptom management does not routinely occur due to a lack of detailed evidence about symptom improvement post-ablation, and a lack of decision aids to communicate evidence to patients. The overarching goal of this award is to create an interactive patient decision aid composed of established evidence from clinical trials together with novel "real world" evidence about symptom improvement post ablation mined from electronic health records (EHRs).
The investigators propose to use "real-world evidence" drawn from electronic health records (EHRs) to characterize post-ablation symptom patterns, and display them in decision-aid visualizations to support shared decision-making (SDM). In this project, the investigators will first use natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) to extract and analyze symptom data from narrative notes in EHRs. The investigators will also employ a rigorous, user-centered design protocol created during the Principal Investigator's post-doctoral work to develop decision-aid visualizations. In the clinical trial, the investigators will evaluate the feasibility of implementing these interactive decision-aid visualizations in clinical practice.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will use an interactive web page intended to aid patient decision-making (i.e., a decision aid) while undergoing consultation for atrial fibrillation ablation.
Time frame: Baseline
Conflict about the decision to undergo atrial fibrillation will be assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale on a scale of 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict).
Time frame: 12 weeks
Regret about the decision to undergo atrial fibrillation will be assessed using the Decision Regret Scale on a scale of 0 (no decision regret) to 100 (extremely high decision regret).
Time frame: 12 weeks
Satisfaction about the decision to undergo atrial fibrillation will be assessed using the Satisfaction with Decision Scale on a scale of 1 (low satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction).
Time frame: 12 weeks
The severity of atrial fibrillation symptoms after an ablation will be assessed using the AFSS on a scale of 0 (no symptom burden) to 35 (extremely high symptom burden).
Time frame: 12 weeks
Health-related quality of life after an ablation will be assessed using the AFEQT on a scale of 0 (complete disability) to 100 (high quality of life).
Columbia University
Other
Data-driven Shared Decision-Making (SDM) to Reduce Symptom Burden in Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03018197
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05820295
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05993897
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Aswān, Aswan Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05357690
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial Details