darbepoetin alfa
DrugAdministered by subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks
Other names: Aranesp
NCT Number: NCT01362140
The primary objective was to assess the superiority of darbepoetin alfa versus placebo on the incidence of red blood cell transfusions during the 24-week double-blind treatment period in anemic patients with low or intermediate-1 risk MDS.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Research Site, Innsbruck, Austria
This study consists of a 3-week screening period, a 24-week double-blind treatment period, and a 48-week active treatment period and the long-term follow-up period.
An end of treatment period (EOTP) visit occurs at week 25, or 3 weeks after last dose of investigational product (IP) for participants who withdraw from the study. After entering the active treatment period, an end of active treatment period (EOATP) visit occurs at week 72 / 73, or 3 weeks after the last dose of darbepoetin alfa.
Long-term follow-up (LTFU) will occur every 26 weeks (± 4 weeks) from the EOATP visit (or EOTP visit if the participant does not enter the active treatment period) and will continue for a minimum of 3 years from the first dose of IP. Follow-up may occur through clinic visit or telephone contacts. Information on the participant's survival and progression to AML status will be collected during LTFU.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Administered by subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks
Other names: Aranesp
Administered by subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks
Time frame: Week 5 to Week 25
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
International Working Group 2006 erythroid response was defined as achieving an initial ≥ 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin from baseline and sustaining an average rise of ≥ 1.5 g/dL in a rolling 56-consecutive day period in the absence of RBC transfusion.
Participants with no hemoglobin collected to the minimum time required to observe an IWG erythroid response (Week 13) were considered non-responders.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the end of the double-blind treatment period; 24 weeks.
The severity of each adverse event was graded using the the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 grading scale, where grade 1 = mild, grade 2 = moderate, grade 3 = severe, grade 4 = life-threatening and grade 5 = death.
Prespecified adverse events of interest for darbepoetin alfa, based on clinical data in anemic patients with cancer, included the following categories: hypersensitivity, cardiac failure, hypertension, malignancies, embolic and thrombolic events, venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), central nervous system vascular disorders, and ischemic heart disease.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Transformation to AML was assessed according to WHO guidelines in the absence of IP and any haematopoietic growth factors (2 weeks off dosing). Bone marrow and/or cytogenetic report confirmation of AML was required (marrow or peripheral blast cells ≥ 20%, presence of pathognomic AML cytogenetic change, or evidence of marrow blast criteria for erythroleukemia). A pathology report confirming other leukemias such as chloroma (granulocytic sarcoma, myeloid sarcoma) or leukemia cutis also constituted transformation to AML.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Time frame: Baseline and end of double-blind treatment period (24 weeks)
Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-darbepoetin alfa antibodies.
Samples were first tested in an immunoassay to detect antibodies capable of binding to darbepoetin alfa. Samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were subsequently tested in a cell-based assay to determine neutralizing activity against darbepoetin alfa. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the sample was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies.
The number of participants who developed antibodies to darbepoetin alfa is defined as participants who were neutralizing antibody positive post-baseline with a negative or no result at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, and weeks 13 and 25
The FACIT-Fatigue scale was a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue.
A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement. End of treatment period (EOTP) analysis includes last available values.
Time frame: Baseline, and weeks 13 and 25
The EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) is a global evaluation of overall health state with scores ranging from 0 (worse health state a participant can imagine) to 100 (best health state a participant can imagine).
End of treatment period (EOTP) analysis includes last available values.
Time frame: Baseline to week 24
The FACIT-Fatigue scale was a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue.
Clinically meaningful improvement in fatigue is defined as an increase of ≥ 3 points in the FACIT-Fatigue subscale score, from baseline to EOTP.
Amgen
Industry
A Multicenter, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Darbepoetin Alfa for the Treatment of Anaemic Subjects With Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04473911
ALL, AML
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02193958
AML, Bone Marrow Diseases
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04017546
AML, Bone Marrow Diseases
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02103478
Bone Marrow Diseases, Hematologic Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details