Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00976300

Cyclosporine A or Intravenous Cyclophosphamide for Lupus Nephritis: The Cyclofa-Lune Study

Intravenous cyclophosphamide is considered to be the standard of care for treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis. However, its use is limited by potentially severe toxic effects. Cyclosporine A has been suggested to be an efficient and safe treatment alternative to cyclophosphamide. In a randomized, multicenter, open-label, controlled trial the investigators sought to compare the efficacy of oral cyclosporine A with intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide to induce durable remission in patients with lupus nephritis III-IV.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Hradec Králové, Czechia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Lupus nephritis occurs in 30-40% of adults with systemic lupus erythematosus and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Focal and diffuse proliferative forms of lupus nephritis are known to progress to chronic renal failure unless treated by immunosuppressive drugs. Cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids are considered to be the standard of care for patients with proliferative lupus nephritis. However, cyclophosphamide may cause a number of toxic effects, such as bone marrow suppression, premature gonadal failure, hemorrhagic cystitis, opportunistic infections, and malignant disease. Hence, efforts are being made to find alternative therapeutic approaches. Cyclosporine is a potent immunosuppressive agent with a more selective mode of action through its unique effect on T cell mediated responses, and is widely used to treat a spectrum of autoimmune and glomerular diseases. Several retrospective series and one randomized trial provided evidence that Cyclosporine A could represent an efficient and safe therapy for proliferative lupus nephritis. In a randomized, multicenter, open-label, controlled trial we compared the efficacy of oral cyclosporine A with intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide to induce durable remission in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (by meeting 4 criteria of the American College of Rheumatology)
  • renal biopsy documenting lupus nephritis according to the classification of the World Health Organization (WHO) or the updated International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) as proliferative glomerulonephritis class III (focal) or IV (diffuse)
  • clinical activity as defined by presence of at least two of the following:
  • abnormal proteinuria (more than 500mg of protein in in a 24-hour urine specimen)
  • abnormal microscopic hematuria, or
  • C3 hypocomplementemia (the latter two were defined according to the norms in the laboratories of the participating centers)

Exclusion criteria

  • treatment with cyclophosphamide or cyclosporine A ever before
  • treatment with other immunosuppressive drugs (such as azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil) or high dose glucocorticoids (≥ 80mg of prednisone or methylprednisolone) within the last 3 months
  • persistent elevation of serum creatinine (≥140 μmol/l)
  • pregnancy or lactation
  • bone marrow insufficiency with cytopenias not attributable to SLE, and 8severe coexisting conditions, such as infection, liver disease, active peptic ulcer etc.

Treatment and study plan

Cyclosporine A

Drug

Cyclosporine arm (CyA group) consisted of oral cyclosporine A (CyA) 4-5mg/kg/day (given in two divided doses) for 9 months followed by gradually decreasing dose of cyclosporine (3.75-1.25 mg/kg/day) within the next 9 months. The dosage of concomitant glucocorticoids was driven and tapered according to a single treatment protocol.

Cyclophosphamide

Drug

Cyclophosphamide (CPH) therapeutic arm (CPH group) consisted of 8 boluses of intravenous cyclophosphamide (10mg/kg) given within 9 months in subsequently prolonged intervals (2x3weeks, 4x4 weeks, 2x6 weeks) followed by 4-5 oral cyclophosphamide boluses (10mg/d in 6-8 week intervals). The dosage of concomitant glucocorticoids was driven and tapered according to a single treatment protocol.

Primary outcomes

  1. renal remission and renal response

    Time frame: at the end of induction (month 9) and maintenance (month 18) phase

Secondary outcomes

  1. incidence of adverse events and relapse free period

    Time frame: 18 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Institute of Rheumatology, Prague

Other

Collaborators

  • Charles University, Czech Republic
  • Department of Rheumatology, Hospital, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
  • Ministry of Health, Czech Republic
  • National Institute of Rheumatology, Piestany, Slovakia
  • Palacky University
  • St. Anna Hospital, Brno, Czech

Registry information

Acronym: CYCLOFA-LUNE

Important dates

Study start
2002
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2009
First posted
Sep 14, 2009
Registry last updated
Jun 23, 2010

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.