Cyanoacrylate
Other3 applications of cyanoacrylate (48 hours interval) at the cervical region of the sensitive tooth
Other names: Superbonder
NCT Number: NCT01111474
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two treatments for dental hypersensitivity: cyanoacrylate (Super Bonder®) compared with use of low intensity laser treatment (LILT). As the cyanoacrylate is a lower cost treatment, the hypothesis in investigation is if this product is equally effective as the laser treatment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me12 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
The present study included 62 patients (15 male and 47 females, aged 12 to 60 years). The initial cervical dentin hypersensitivity was checked throughout a thermal test (air blast). The 434 teeth included were that with a score ≥5 in a numerical scale rating of pain. Teeth were randomly assigned according quadrants (split mouth design) - 216 were allocated to LILT group and 218 for the Super Bonder® group. Thermal tests with a tetrafluoroethane spray (Endo-Ice®) and air blast were performed and considered as baseline. Pain parameters were recorded using a numerical scale rating with 24 hours, 30, 90 and 180 days after the interventions. Quality of life of the patients was also assessed with the use of OHIP-14 at baseline and after 180 days.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
3 applications of cyanoacrylate (48 hours interval) at the cervical region of the sensitive tooth
Other names: Superbonder
This process was conducted three times with an interval of 48 hours between applications, according to laser's manufacturer advice Clean Line Easy Laser - LILT®, Clean Line Easy Laser Doctor Dental Products Industry LTDA, BRA). For dentin hypersensitivity, the application of 1Joule/cm^2 is recommended for eight seconds at three points along the dental neck, using the infrared wavelength (795nm).
Other names: LILT
Time frame: Baseline and 180 days
Change in pain experienced by the participants was calculated as the difference between baseline level of pain sensitivity and after 180 days. Pain was recorded using a numerical pain assessment scale with range between 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The higher the numbering the worse the result.
Time frame: Baseline and 180 days
Difference between the level of quality of life - Oral Health Impact Profile "OHIP" at baseline and 180 days. OHIP-14 total scale ranges from 0 to 56 points with higher scores indicating a poorer oral health-related quality of life. The response format uses a Likert-type frequency scale such as follows: very often = 4, fairly often = 3, occasionally = 2, hardly ever = 1, never = 0. Total score is obtained by summing the response codes of the 14 items constituting the measure.
Federal University of São Paulo
Other
Effectiveness of Cyanoacrylate and Laser in the Treatment of Cervical Dentin Sensitivity
Acronym: Cyano-laser
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04591444
Dentin Hypersensitivity, Dentin Sensitivity
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT03943095
Dentin Hypersensitivity, Dentin Sensitivity
Mississauga, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT02931734
Dentin Hypersensitivity, Dentin Sensitivity
Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT07669818
Dentin Hypersensitivity, Dentin Sensitivity
Cairo, Other, Egypt
View Trial Details