Dania Raad
Al Mansurah, Dakhaliya, 12345, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07679451
This randomized controlled clinical study aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of custom-made polyether ether ketone (PEEK) membranes versus polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes in guided bone regeneration for maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation in the esthetic zone. Thirty patients requiring ridge augmentation prior to dental implant placement will be enrolled and randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group A will receive customized PEEK membranes, while Group B will be treated with PTFE membranes. Clinical and radiographic assessments, including cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), will be performed immediately postoperatively, at 6 months, and at 12 months to evaluate volumetric, horizontal, and vertical bone gain as well as soft tissue healing and complication rates.
Interested in participating?
Request Info20 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Al Mansurah, Dakhaliya, 12345, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a widely accepted technique used to reconstruct deficient alveolar ridges prior to or in conjunction with dental implant placement. This study is designed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of two different non-resorbable barrier membranes in maxillary ridge augmentation: customized polyether ether ketone (PEEK) membranes and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes.
Thirty patients requiring maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation in the esthetic zone will be recruited from the Outpatient Clinic of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University. Patients will be randomly allocated into two groups of equal size. Group A will receive patient-specific 3D-printed PEEK membranes designed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology. Group B will receive PTFE membranes stabilized over the grafted site using bone tacks.
In both groups, autogenous bone graft combined with xenogeneic bone substitute will be used for ridge augmentation. Standard surgical protocols will be followed, including flap elevation, recipient site preparation, graft placement, and tension-free primary closure.
Clinical outcomes will be assessed by evaluating soft tissue healing, infection, membrane exposure, and wound dehiscence. Radiographic outcomes will be evaluated using CBCT scans taken immediately postoperatively, at 6 months, and at 12 months. Three-dimensional analysis will be performed using specialized software to measure volumetric bone gain as well as linear horizontal and vertical ridge augmentation.
The study aims to determine whether customized PEEK membranes provide comparable or superior outcomes to PTFE membranes in terms of bone regeneration, stability of augmented volume, and postoperative complications.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Age between 20 and 45 years. Male or female participants. Presence of single or multiple missing teeth associated with vertical alveolar defects (vertical bone height less than 8 mm), horizontal alveolar defects (ridge width less than 6 mm), or combined defects in the maxillary esthetic zone requiring alveolar ridge augmentation before implant placement.
Good oral hygiene.
Exclusion criteria
Uncontrolled medical disorders contraindicating surgical intervention. Systemic diseases or medications affecting bone metabolism. Current or previous bisphosphonate therapy. History of radiotherapy. History of chemotherapy. Smokers.
Customized perforated polyether ether ketone (PEEK) membrane designed from preoperative CBCT data and used for guided bone regeneration during maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation.
Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane used for guided bone regeneration during maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation.
Time frame: 6 months after surgery
Volumetric bone gain in the augmented maxillary alveolar ridge measured using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and three-dimensional reconstruction software. Volumetric analysis will be performed by comparing immediate postoperative and 6-month postoperative CBCT scans.
Volumetric bone gain in the augmented maxillary alveolar ridge measured using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and three-dimensional reconstruction software. Volumetric analysis will be performed by comparing immediate postoperative and 6-month postoperative CBCT scans.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Mansoura University
Other
Custom-Made Polyether Ether Ketone Membrane Versus Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane in Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07701473
Alveolar Bone Loss, Alveolar Ridge Deficiency
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07654218
Alveolar Bone Loss, Alveolar Ridge Deficiency
Porto, Portugal
View Trial DetailsNCT07520903
Alveolar Bone Loss, Alveolar Ridge Deficiency
Porto, Porto District, Portugal
View Trial DetailsNCT06342973
Alveolar Ridge Deficiency
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
View Trial Details