Department of Internal Medicine, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine
Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, 200-704, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT02044536
The optimal number of biopsy and the detection rate of neoplastic lesions are not established. The aim of this study is to assess the current practice pattern and effect of training in upper endoscopic biopsy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeThe endoscopic examination is indicated in the diagnosis of variety of gastrointestinal diseases and screening for the neoplastic lesions. Especially, in Korea where the stomach cancer prevalent area, high-quality endoscopic examination is required not to overlook pathologic lesions. Endoscopic biopsy is the gold standard for the confirmation of endoscopic diagnosis. It is usually decided based on the abnormal morphology of the lesions or color change of the mucosa. Diagnostic accuracy is known to be improved by training or using optical techniques or chromoendoscopy. With the development of endoscopic imaging technologies such as narrow band imaging (NBI), confocal imaging or magnifying techniques, the diagnostic accuracy can be enhanced. However, inspection with conventional white light endoscopy is still the most prevalent and basic form of screening or surveillance endoscopy. Thus, detecting lesions by meticulous inspection and accurate approach by targeted biopsy are important for the diagnosis of pathologic lesions. However, the optimal number of biopsy and the detection rate of neoplastic lesions are not established. This study aimed at evaluating the current practice pattern and effect of training in conventional upper endoscopic biopsy.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
retrospective data review
Time frame: During 3 months (retrospective endoscopy data review)
In the evaluation of concordance rate and discrepancy rate, endoscopic diagnosis in the procedure report and histologic diagnosis in the pathology report will be compared.
Time frame: During 3 months (retrospetive endoscopy data review)
Neoplasm detection rates of diagnostic upper endoscopic biopsy between trainees and faculty doctors will be compared statistically.
Time frame: During 3 months (retrospective endoscopy data review)
The distribution of the histologic and endoscopic diagnosis for total biopsied lesion will be analyzed.
Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital
Other
Retrospective Study of Current Practice Pattern and Effect of Training in Upper Endoscopic Biopsy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07192926
Atrophy, Bronchial Neoplasms
Ankara, Yenimahalle, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02851706
Astrocytoma, Brain Cancer
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05909202
Caregivers, Neoplasm
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04142567
Neoplasm, Neoplasms
Paris, France
View Trial Details