Dunamenti REK Reprodukciós Központ
Budapest, 1125, Hungary
NCT Number: NCT05103228
Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is an important step during in vitro fertilization (IVF). Its aim optimally is to recruit 10-15 oocytes. When deciding on the actual treatment, different stimulation protocols, various stimulating agents and wide range of gonadotropin dose can one choose from. Prior to the decision on the actual stimulation protocol and gonadotropin (Gn) dose the patient's expected response to stimulation is assessed primarily using ovarian reserve markers. Most medications used during stimulation exert their effect in a dose-dependent manner hence with a higher Gn dose one would expect a better response, more oocytes. More oocytes could translate into more embryos and potentially a higher pregnancy rate. The currently available evidence however does not support this practice as randomized controlled trials (RCT) have failed to show that the use of higher Gn dose results in higher pregnancy, live-birth rates. These studies however identified patients based on different criteria, compared different stimulation protocols and various Gn doses. There are only two RCTs that compared cumulative live birth rates (fresh + frozen embryo transfers) and they identified poor responders based on different criteria and used different drug regimens. Therefore, the aim of our study is to compare cumulative IVF clinical pregnancy rates using a lower and a higher gonadotropin dose among poor responders identified based on universally accepted criteria.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–42 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Budapest, 1125, Hungary
Background: IVF is started after proper evaluation based on an appropriate indication for the treatment. The first phase of the treatment is the stimulation with the aim to recruit sufficient number of oocytes. In general, 10-15 oocytes are aimed for. This many oocytes should be sufficient for the embryology laboratory procedures and should allow the provider to choose the embryo or embryos for transfer from a larger cohort. More oocytes are associated with more side effects and fewer oocytes limit the efficacy of the laboratory procedures. Stimulation is individualized and usually age, ovarian reserve markers, weight and response to previous stimulation are taken into consideration when decisions are made. Based on ovarian reserve markers patients are grouped as expected normal responders, hyper-responders or poor responders. A poor responder is a patient with low ovarian reserve or low number of oocytes in the ovaries. Their care can be challenging. Different pre-stimulation interventions and various stimulation approaches have been explored in this subset of patients. Typically, providers will prescribe higher gonadotropin doses and expect the retrieval of more oocytes resulting in more transferable embryos. Studies so far however have not supported this practice. In expected poor responders most studies have not shown the collection of more oocytes with higher dose gonadotropins. Those that did find more oocytes described an additional 1-2 oocytes only. None of the studies so far have reported improved pregnancy outcome, including cumulative outcome with more gonadotropins though. The literature is confounded by the various definitions of the poor responder patient, the use of various stimulation protocols in the active treatment versus control groups, the use of oral agents as active treatment and the different clinical endpoints tested (oocyte number, clinical pregnancy, live birth, cumulative live birth). Therefore, we plan to study patients identified as poor responders based on established criteria (POSEIDON criteria). We will use the same stimulation protocols, drug types in the experimental and control groups. We will study clinically meaningful outcomes, live birth rate and cumulative live birth rate.
Design: Investigator initiated prospective, randomized, multi-center, non-blinded trial to compared higher and lower gonadotropin in poor responder patients undegoing IVF-ICSI treatment identified based on Posedion III-IV criteria
Participants: The investigators will enroll patients who, based on their initial evaluation, reproductive history or prior fertility treatment, have a proper indication to undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF)/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. A basic infertility evaluation includes: 1.) hormonal evaluation of ovarian function, including ovarian reserve testing (anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH] level, antral follicle count [AFC]), 2) transvaginal ultrasound evaluation of female internal genital organs, 3) evaluation of the uterine cavity (hysterosalpingogram, saline sonohysterogram or hysteroscopy), 4) cervical cancer screening, 5) cervical culture for Chlamydia, 6) serologic testing for HIV, hepatitis B, C, syphilis (both partners), 7) semen analysis, 8) male andrological exam, 9) if needed male hormonal +/- genetic testing. IVF-ICSI treatment is started for advanced maternal age, diminished ovarian reserve (DOR), unexplained infertility after failed intrauterine inseminations, male factor infertility, endometriosis.
The investigators plan to recruit:
Methods: prospective, multicenter (5 centers), randomized controlled trial comparing a higher or lower gonadotropin (Gn) dose treatment. In both the low and high groups two different drug regimens (follitropin alpha + hp human menopausal gonadotropin or follitropin delta + hp human menopausal gonadotropin) will be used. 150 IU follitropin alpha was shown to be equally effective to 10 mcg follitropin delta. Therefore, the investigators expect similar response (oocyte yield) with the two regimens within the high and low Gn dose groups but the study design still will allow the investigators to compare the two follitropin medications too, which is a secondary aim.
Lower-dose group:
Higher-dose group:
Treatment protocol:
The care of the patients will not differ from the care of non-study patients in terms of potential medication dose, the number of clinic visits, retrieval and embryology procedures as well as prenatal care.
Randomization: Randomization will be performed according to a computer generated list. (www.randomizer.org) The planned sample size is 700 patients (350 in both the low- and high-dose groups).
Sample size calculation: In order to determine the sample size, the investigators calculated with a 20% pregnancy rate in a patient population that fits the inclusion-exclusion criteria. The investigators expect higher oocyte yield in the higher dose group that should result in more available embryos and therefore more frozen embryo transfers. The investigators calculate that this could increase the cumulative pregnancy rate by 50%. The investigators also believe that about 20% of the patients will drop out for various reasons. Therefore, 350 participants are needed in both arms of the study.
Statistical analysis: After the enrollment of the first 350 patients, a planned interim analysis will be performed to decide whether the planned sample size is sufficient to achieve our goal. Logistic regression analysis using a generalized, mixed linear model will be used to assess the impact of various Gn doses on pregnancy rates. Chi-square test will be used to test significance and OR will be calculated.
Data will be collected for the following parameters:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
lower dose gonadotropin (follitropin alpha/ follitropin delta + hpHMG) vs. higher dose stimulation (Follitropin alpha/delta + hpHMG)
Other names: Ovaleap (Theramex Ireland Limited), Bemfola (Richter Gedeon Nyrt., Hungary), Gonal F (Merck Europe B.V.)
lower dose gonadotropin (follitropin alpha/ follitropin delta + hpHMG) vs. higher dose stimulation (Follitropin alpha/delta + hpHMG)
Other names: Rekovelle (Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Denmark)
lower dose gonadotropin (follitropin alpha/ follitropin delta + hpHMG) vs. higher dose stimulation (Follitropin alpha/delta + hpHMG)
Other names: Menopur (Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Denmark)
Time frame: 18 months
an ultrasound confirmation of an intrauterine gestational sac with an embryo with detectable heartbeat in it after the fresh + if available frozen embryo transfer treatments
Time frame: 12 months
delivery of a viable newborn after 24 weeks gestation
Time frame: 12 months
Cumulative live birth: delivery of a viable newborn after 24 weeks gestation after the fresh embryo transfer or if it is unsuccessful but surplus embryos were frozen then after any of the subsequent frozen embryo transfer cycles. All these transfers (fresh and frozen) are the result of a single stimulation. If a live birth is reached during the fresh or any of the subsequent frozen transfers from the same stimulation then it is considered a positive outcome; if the fresh transfer or any of the subsequent frozen transfers from the same stimulation do not result in a live birth it is considered a negative result.
Peter Kovacs MD
Other
Cumulative Pregnancy Rate With Lower and Higher Dose of Gonadotropin During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation During IVF Among Expected Poor Responders: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06659692
Genital Diseases, Infertility
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06924437
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB), Endometrial Polyp
Sohag, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT01511588
Adolescents, Amenorrhea
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07399535
Adnexal Diseases, Cysts
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
View Trial Details