Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00862030

CT-Based Versus Conventional Simulation for Palliative Radiotherapy of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Radiotherapy (RT) treatment to the chest is a standard way of trying to decrease symptoms like cough or shortness of breath. Before any RT can be delivered, it must be planned, either using conventional x-rays ("fluoroscopy") or using computer tomography ("CT") scanning. This study is being done because the investigators do not know which of these two common ways of RT planning is better for balancing both treating the cancer and decreasing side effects.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Cross Cancer Institute

Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, Canada

About this study

Standard RT planning will be performed under conventional simulation, followed by CT-simulation (for study purposes only). Retrospectively, 3D treatment fields will be designed using the CT-simulation data, and compared to the actual treatment fields planned using x-rays. Coverage of the tumour volume will be assessed, together with doses, field sizes and beam positions, to determine relative undercoverage of tumour and overcoverage of normal tissue between the two planning methods, if any.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with local symptoms secondary to histologically-confirmed non-small cell lung cancer
  • Patients who will be receiving palliative-intent external beam radiotherapy
  • Patients who are clinically appropriate for conventional radiotherapy planning
  • Patients who can provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who cannot provide written informed consent

Treatment and study plan

CT- simulation scan

Procedure

Patients who are receiving standard palliative radiotherapy planned under x-rays will also undergo 1 CT-simulation scan which they would otherwise not require. The planning x-rays and CT scan will then be compared dosimetrically

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Alberta Health services

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Two-versus Three-Dimensional Treatment Planning for Patients Receiving Chest Radiotherapy for Symptom Control

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Mar 16, 2009
Registry last updated
Aug 8, 2011

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.