Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05915000

CSF Protein Markers as Prognostic Indicators of the Response to CSF Shunt in Normotensive Hydrocephalus

In all published series of adult chronic hydrocephalus, there is a percentage between twenty and twenty-five percent of patients who present poor results after implantation of a cerebrospinal fluid shunt,1-11 usually ventriculoperitoneal. The lumboperitoneal shunt is also used but much more rarely.

The diagnosis of this pathology is based on the clinical picture, neuroimaging studies (Evans index and corpus callosum angle), cerebrospinal fluid dynamics tests (Katzman test), and invasive intracranial pressure measurements. Despite all this diagnostic arsenal, there is a high percentage of patients (mentioned above) in which treatment by diversion of cerebrospinal fluid does not offer the expected results. Traditionally, this has been attributed to chronic adult hydrocephalus being associated with other types of dementia. This may be the case in some patients, and it would be important to predict which patients will not improve or who will improve poorly in the case of insertion of a cerebrospinal fluid shunt.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Adult chronic hydrocephalus, also known as normal pressure hydrocephalus or normal pressure hydrocephalus, presents with the classic Hakim-Adams triad, gait ataxia or "magnetic gait", urinary incontinence, and dementia.

Most cases have an idiopathic origin and constitute the only potentially reversible cause of dementia with surgical treatment (using a system for shunting the cerebrospinal fluid or CSF from the lateral ventricles or the thecal sac to the peritoneal cavity or right atrium ), so it is especially important to diagnose and treat it properly.

The prevalence of this pathology is increasing in line with the increase in the life expectancy of the population.

The diagnosis of this pathology is based on the clinical features, neuroimaging studies (CT and Magnetic Resonance), cerebrospinal fluid dynamics tests (Katzman test), cerebrospinal fluid drainage by lumbar puncture or using lumbar drainage for hours, and invasive measurements of Intracranial Pressure (ICP). Continuous monitoring of Intracranial Pressure with the patient admitted for 3-5 days (continuously night and day) is the most sensitive and specific diagnostic method for this disease, but it also has its false positives and negatives. Likewise, even though complications are very infrequent, it is an invasive technique that requires prolonged and continuous recordings to assess hydrodynamic changes.

Unfortunately, and despite all the diagnostic arsenal, the results of treatment using cerebrospinal fluid shunts (lumboperitoneal or ventriculoperitoneal), even in the best series, yield 20-25% poor results. These poor results have been attributed to many factors, including associated cerebral vascular disease problems, coexisting dementia not always well diagnosed, and Parkinson's disease.

On the other hand, the incorrect indication of a shunt can lead to unnecessary complications, potential morbidity and mortality (subdural hematomas, infections, etc.), and the low success rates mentioned above. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the diagnosis and treatment of these patients as much as possible.

In an attempt to improve the diagnostic arsenal and, above all, try to predict which patients will improve and in which areas (cognitive, motor, or sphincter control), some researchers have studied the levels of certain proteins or peptides. in the cerebrospinal fluid obtained by a lumbar or ventricular puncture to try to find some kind of correlation between the levels of these protein markers and the type of dementia (Alzheimer's, for example, or adult chronic hydrocephalus) and the response to be expected with the implantation of a cerebrospinal fluid shunt. The markers have been highly varied (amyloid β1-42, amyloid β1-40, T-tau, phospho-tau, neurofilament light chain protein, neurogranin, monocyte chemoattractant protein), and not all of them are available to all hospitals. In our environment, we have the determination in cerebrospinal fluid of the Aβ1-42 amyloid, phospho-tau, and h-tau proteins, which are the most widely used internationally. The purpose of this study is to try to see if there is a correlation between the levels of cerebrospinal fluid obtained by lumbar puncture during the practice of the Katzman test and the results of the implantation of a cerebrospinal fluid shunt and to try to find out which marker is related to which the improvement of each of the three symptoms that afflict patients with adult chronic hydrocephalus, that is, cognitive impairment, gait problems, and inadequate sphincter control.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Minimum age of 18 years, there is no maximum age, especially if it is understood that this pathology is more frequent as one advance in age, especially among males; pathology compatible with chronic adult hydrocephalus

Exclusion criteria

  • All patients whose suspected diagnosis is not adult chronic hydrocephalus will be excluded, specifically those with cerebrovascular disease, dementia not due to adult chronic hydrocephalus, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and hereditary degenerative brain pathology. Huntington's chorea

Treatment and study plan

Lumbar CSF protein marker determination

Diagnostic Test

The cerebrospinal fluid levels of the Aβ1-42 amyloid, h-tau and phospho-tau proteins will be assessed. The response of patients to the possible implantation of a ventricular peritoneal shunt will be assessed through neuropsychological, gait and ventricular size studies assessed through cerebral magnetic resonance studies.

Primary outcomes

  1. Correlation Between CSF Amyloid β1-42 Level and Shunt Response

    Time frame: 1 year

    Correlation between lumbar CSF Amyloid β1-42 concentration and clinical outcome following CSF shunting.

    Unit of Measure: pg/mL

  2. Correlation Between CSF Total Tau (h-tau) Level and Shunt Response

    Time frame: 1 year

    Correlation between lumbar CSF total tau concentration and clinical outcome following CSF shunting.

    Unit of Measure: pg/mL

  3. Correlation Between CSF Phospho-Tau Level and Shunt Response

    Time frame: 1 year

    Correlation between lumbar CSF phospho-tau concentration and clinical outcome following CSF shunting.

    Unit of Measure: pg/mL

  4. Threshold Levels of CSF Biomarkers Associated With Poor Shunt Response

    Time frame: 1 year

    Identification of cutoff values of CSF β1-42 amyloid, total tau, and phospho-tau associated with poor clinical response after CSF shunting.

    Unit of Measure: pg/mL

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Clinical Research Support Office

CONTACT

[email protected]

Vicente Vanaclocha, Full Professor

CONTACT

[email protected]

+34 963 13 18 00 ext. 438500

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Valencia

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Alterations of CSF Protein Markers as Prognostic Indicator of the Response to Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunting in Chronic Hydrocephalus in Adults

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Jun 22, 2023
Registry last updated
Apr 22, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.