Department of Anesthesia and Pain medicine.National Cancer Institute
Cairo, 11796, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT03681847
Spinal anesthesia is commonly accompanied by hypotension due to vasodilation that follows sympathetic blockade and decreased systemic vascular resistance. Prevention of hypotension is usually achieved through administration of fluids and vasopressors .There is an ongoing debate concerning both the proper fluid timing, pre-load against co-load and fluid type crystalloids against colloids .This study aims at comparing the effectiveness of co-loading of crystalloids versus colloids versus hypertonic saline 3% in preventing hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, 11796, Egypt
Spinal anesthesia is commonly accompanied by hypotension due to vasodilation that follows sympathetic blockade and decreased systemic vascular resistance. Prevention of hypotension is usually achieved through administration of fluids and vasopressors . Fluids are either administrated before initiation of spinal anesthesia which is defined as fluid pre-loading or at time of initiation of spinal anesthesia which is defined as fluid co-loading .There is an ongoing debate concerning both the proper fluid timing, pre-load against co-load and fluid type crystalloids against colloids. Fluid preloading with colloids appears to have superior effect on that of crystalloids as the later shows a shorter intravascular half-life. While both colloid and crystalloid co-loading show comparable results .Although crystalloid preloading has been the traditional regimen for long time, it failed to reduce the incidence of hypotension. This is because crystalloids rapidly distribute out of the intravascular compartment to the interstitial space. Superiority of fluid co-loading might be explained by decrease of the extravascular crystalloid redistribution secondary to the simultaneous vasodilatation response to sympathetic block.This study aims at comparing the effectiveness of co-loading of crystalloids versus colloids versus hypertonic saline 3% in preventing hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
normal saline 0.9% 15 ml/kg over 15-20 minutes.
hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in 0.9 % sodium chloride 5 ml/kg over 15-20 minutes.
hypertonic saline 3% (7ml/kg) over 15-20 minutes.
Time frame: 3 hours
The development of hypotension
Time frame: 3 hours
measurement of serum sodium level
National Cancer Institute, Egypt
Other
Crystalloids Versus Colloids Versus Hypertonic Saline Co-load During Spinal Anesthesia: Which is More Effective
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06988982
Ambulatory Surgery, Spinal Anaesthesia
Zagazig, Al Sharqia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07594366
Spinal Anaesthesia, Spinal Anaesthetic Poisoning
Ismailia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07333703
Anaesthesia, Lumbosacral Spinal Stenosis
Samsun, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06550180
Abdominoplasty, Spinal Anaesthesia
Al Mansurah, Mansoura, Egypt
View Trial Details