M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
NCT Number: NCT04150939
This interventional trial studies the effectiveness of adding cryoablation treatment in patients who are receiving standard of care immunotherapy to treat cancer that is has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic). Cryoablation uses a probe that freezes the tissue around the tumor to try to kill the cancer cells. Using cryoablation to treat cancerous lesions may help to kill the cancer cells.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To determine the effect of cryoablation on adaptive resistance to immunotherapy in metastatic cancer patients.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess additional efficacy response to treatment. II. To assess the safety and tolerability of cryoablation in this population. III. To compare the radiologic response of ablated and non-ablated lesions using Immune-Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST) and RECIST 1.1.
IV. To assess the immune effect of cryoablation on the non-ablated lesion using pre- and post-treatment biopsies.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate the immune microenvironment and systemic changes as a result of cryoablation with the goal of biomarker discovery.
OUTLINE:
Beginning 1 week prior to the next scheduled standard of care immunotherapy infusion, patients undergo core biopsy of the lesion to be ablated and a non-ablated lesion and also undergo cryoablation. Patients undergo a mandatory second core biopsy of the non-ablated lesion at 4 weeks after cryoablation.
After completion of study, patients are followed up for 12 months after cryoablation and then periodically thereafter.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo core biospy
Other names: core needle biopsy
Undergo cryoablation
Other names: Cryoablation, cryosurgical ablation
Receive standard of care immunotherapy
Other names: Biological Response Modifier, Biomodulators, BRM, Immune Mediators, Immune Modulators, Immune Regulators, Immunomodulating Agent, Immunomodulators, Immunomodulatory Agent, Immunopotentiators, Immunotherapy Agent
Time frame: Up to 12 months post cryoablation
Will be determined by Immune-Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST). Best objective response will be measured by the proportion of patients who achieve complete response (CR) + partial response (PR). The proportion of patients in the efficacy evaluable population who respond (i.e., have a best response of CR or PR) will be estimated along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval, using the Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Will be determined by iRECIST. PFS will be calculated and plotted by Kaplan-Meier methods.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Will be determined by iRECIST. TTP will be calculated and plotted by Kaplan-Meier methods
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Ablated lesions time to progression will be determined b iRECIST and RECIST 1.1. Non-ablated lesion time to progression will be determined by iRECIST and RECIST 1.1. TTP will be calculated and plotted by Kaplan-Meier methods.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Descriptive statistics will summarize disease control rate by iRECIST.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Descriptive statistics will summarize duration of stable disease by iRECIST.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Descriptive statistics will summarize duration of response by iRECIST.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
AEs will be graded and categorized according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5. Counts and percentages of patients experiencing each adverse event as well as any grade 3 or higher event will be summarized.
Time frame: From the date of study entry until death from any cause, assessed up to 2 years
OS will be calculated and plotted by Kaplan-Meier methods.
Time frame: Baseline up to 12 months post cryoablation
Will use a paired t test to determine if there is a difference in pre- and post immune cryoablation therapy in T-effector cell populations; T-regulatory populations; CD4 subsets; B cell populations; dendritic and macrophage populations. Will use scatterplots to demonstrate correlation between immunologic markers obtained in peripheral blood versus those obtained at the tissue level. A Pearson correlation will be estimated to describe the level of association.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Will assess various immune parameters in blood and tissue, including changes in immune cell composition and peripheral blood samples. Will use scatterplots to demonstrate correlation between immunologic markers obtained in peripheral blood versus those obtained at the tissue level. A Pearson correlation will be estimated to describe the level of association.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Other
Cryoablation Challenge Evaluated in Adaptive-Immune Resistance (CEDAR)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03743649
Confusion, Delirium
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02286687
ATM Gene Mutation, Advanced Malignant Neoplasm
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03525873
Advanced Malignant Neoplasm, Disease Attributes
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03671226
Advanced Malignant Neoplasm, Caregiver
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial Details