Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02366832

Cryoablation for Phantom Limb Pain

The purpose of this study is to determine if treatment with percutaneous cryoablation yields significant differences in the evaluative criteria of Phantom Limb Syndrome (PLS).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Emory University Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States

About this study

This study aims to treat Phantom Limb Syndrome (PLS) with cryoablation of the remaining nerve stumps. The rationale is that because the pain in PLS follows the known distribution of nerves, and because the amputated nerves are known to undergo changes after the surgery that may lead to excessive "firing," that interruption of the nerve impulses will reduce patient pain.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects are status post (s/p) amputation of an upper or lower limb. That is, the amputation is not congenital.
  • Refractory pain symptoms, following tissue healing(postoperatively, or post injury) are related to amputation as determined by referring physician and investigator, to include: stump pain, phantom pain, unpleasant phantom sensations, and/or undesirable and/or life-limiting kinesthetic sensations. The character, frequency, location, description, and exacerbation or relieving elements will be recorded.

Patients will be questioned as to the location of their sensation, be it pain, movement, burning, tingling, or other. The location of their pain will be correlated with the corresponding proximal nerve stump.

  • Positive anesthetic/steroid block, as performed under CT guidance in an analogous fashion to the cryoablation procedure.
  • Absence of infection
  • Absence of coagulopathy
  • Ability and willingness of patient to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Active infection
  • Underlying congenital segmentation or other spinal anomalies that result in differential nerve root pressures
  • Significant spinal stenosis interpreted as "severe" on any cross sectional imaging study
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant
  • Immunosuppression
  • History or laboratory results indicative of any significant cardiac, endocrine, hematologic, hepatic, immunologic, infectious, metabolic, urologic, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, psychiatric, renal, neoplastic, or other disorder that in the opinion of the Principal Investigator would preclude the safe performance of cryoablation.
  • Uncorrectable coagulopathies
  • Concurrent participation in another investigational trial involving systemic administration of agents or within the previous 30 days.
  • Have undergone a previous surgical intervention - post amputation - that may have altered the target nerve.

Treatment and study plan

Cryoablation

Procedure

Subjects who respond to lidocaine nerve block will undergo CT guided cryoablation of the affected nerve stump with a 17g Galil Medical Ice Sphere cryoablation needle.

Other names: Cryotherapy, Cryosurgery

17g Galil Medical Ice Sphere cryoablation needle

Device

Under CT guidance, the corresponding nerve will be targeted with a 17g probe. Two freeze-thaw cycles will be undertaken. The probe will be removed and a final scan obtained.

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of cryoablation, defined by number of participants, in which cryoablation was performed successfully

    Time frame: Post-Cryoablation

    Feasibility, defined by number of participants, in which cryoablation was performed successfully

  2. Safety of cryoablation procedure, measured by the number of subjects that had cryoablation procedure events (CPEs).

    Time frame: 56 days

    Safety is measured by the number of subjects that had cryoablation procedure events (CPEs). CPEs are device- or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAE) or adverse events (AE) categorized as clinical signs or symptoms of infection (fever), hemorrhage (pain, imaging changes), nerve pain worsening, or toxicity of any kind (confusion, seizure).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in pain scores on visual analogue scale (VAS )

    Time frame: Baseline, day 56

    Change in pain score will be calculated by subtracting the day 56 pain score from the baseline pain score.The pain scores are on a continuous visual analogue scale of 0 to 100 mm. 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain. The VAS is scored simply by measuring the distance, in mm, from the patient's mark to one of the ends of the line.

  2. Change in quality of life, measured using Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ)

    Time frame: Baseline, day 56

    Quality of life will be measured using Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ); it is a validated measure of physical disability due to low back pain.The best score is 0 (no disability) and worst is 24 (maximum disability).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Emory University

Other

Collaborators

  • Boston Scientific Corporation

Registry information

Official study title

Percutaneous Image Guided Cryoablation for the Treatment of Refractory Phantom Limb Pain

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Feb 19, 2015
Registry last updated
Mar 22, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.