Questionnaire
Diagnostic TestA battery of questionnaires will be propose to the participants
NCT Number: NCT04158180
Introduction. Distasis rectus abdominis (DRA) is defined as the presence of divergence between the rectus abdominis muscles along the linea alba. Some authors describe a prevalence of 40% in women up to one year postpartum. Some studies suggest that the presence of DRA can be related to the appearance of low back, pelvic and abdominal pain and even urinary incontinence. These factors can significantly affect the quality of life of women with diastasis both socially, sexual and personal level. According to several studies, this pathology is related to higher rates of depression and an alteration in the self-perception of body image that makes these women to look to specialized medical care.
At present, the quantitative evaluation of DRA is performed purely anatomically. This evaluation consists in measuring the separation between the two rectus abdominis. Currently there is no consensus as to the protocol that should be used for this measurement.
So far, no instrument is able to quantitatively measure the consequences of DRA. The evaluation of symptoms and consequences should include relevant parameters such as quality of life, perception of body image and functional limitations.
The objective of this study is the creation and validation of a specific questionnaire to evaluate the symptoms and consequences of DRA.
Material and methods. A) Development of the questionnaire
1. Literature review 2. Online survey 3. Expert panel 4. Pilot test of the questionnaire
B) Validation of the questionnaire. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire will be evaluated in a sample of patients with DRA. The sample will be composed of a group of adult women with DRA who attended to a physiotherapy clinic.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–65 year
Female
Observational
Haro&Campos Physiotherapy., Plasencia, Cáceres, Spain
Introduction. Women with Diastasis rectus abdominis (DRA) often experience decreased physical health and functioning, negative body image and abdominal discomfort. These parameters have major impact on quality of life, becoming an additional barrier to physical activity during pregnancy and postnatal period. Nowadays, the most utilized method to evaluate DRA consists of measuring the separation between the two medial borders of the rectus abdominis muscles (namely inter-recti distance). Nevertheless, any specific tool has been created for the evaluation of parameters such as quality of life, body image perception, pain and secondary functional limitations. A valid and reliable instrument, with acceptable psychometric properties is necessary to specifically evaluate symptoms of DRA and to improve the evaluation of DRA and ultimately improve patient-centered care.
The main aim of this projet is the development and validation of such a tool.
Material and methods.
The current project consists of several stages:
A) Development of the questionnaire.
B) Validation of the questionnaire. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire will be evaluated in a sample of patients with DRA. The sample will be composed of a group of adult women with DRA who attended to a physiotherapy clinic. Participants will complete a series of questions including sociodemographic variables and the final version of the questionnaire. In order to calculate convergent validity, participants will be asked to complete five comparative questionnaires: Whoqol-bref overall quality of life and general health" subscale, GIQLI "Symptoms" subscale, Whoqol-bref "social relationships" subscale, WHODAS-36 "mobility" and "life activities" subscales and Body Image States Scale (BISS).Internal consistency, the type error, the ceiling floor effect, the convergent validity, the validity of the construct, the discriminatory capacity and the minimum detectable change of the questionnaire will be calculated. Seven to 10 days after the completion of the online survey, participants will be asked to fill in the final questionnaire again in order to evaluate test-retest reliability. The standard error of the measurement, the minimum detectable change and the intraclass correlation coefficient will be calculated. After the completion of the study, the dataset will be published. The COSMIN Study Design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments will be used to report and design this study.
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A battery of questionnaires will be propose to the participants
Time frame: 7 to 10 days after initial assessment
Diastasis rectus abdominis consequences will be measured using the Diastasis rectus abdominis questionnaire
Time frame: Initial assessment
The distance between the two medial borders of rectus abdominis muscles will be measured using ultrasound
Time frame: Initial assessment
Subjective well-being will be measured using the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQOL-Bref) "overall quality of life and general health" subscale (2-10 points). Domain scores are scaled in a positive direction, higher scores denote higher quality of life.
Time frame: Initial assessment
Gastrointestinal symptoms will be measured using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) "Symptoms" subscale (0-36 points). 4-likert scale ( 0 points being the worst punctuation and 4 points the best)
Time frame: Initial assessment
Functioning will be measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-36 (WHODAS-36) "mobility" and "life activities"subscales (0-36points). 5- point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate lower quality of life.
Time frame: Initial assessment
Body image will be measured using the Body Image States Scale (BISS) (6-54points). The scale was presented in a negative-to-positive direction for half of the items and a positive-to-negative direction for the other half.
Time frame: Initial assessment
Social relationships-related quality of life will be measured using the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQOL-bref) "social relationships" subscale (3-15 points). Domain scores are scaled in a positive direction, higher scores denote higher quality of life.
Time frame: Initial assessment
Psychological distress will be measured using Kessler psychological distress scale (K10). Low scores indicate low levels of psychological distress and high scores indicate high levels of psychological distress. (10-50 points)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Valencia
Other
Creation and Validation of a Questionnaire on Diastasis Recti Signs and Symptoms
Acronym: QUEDIA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07017309
Diastasis Recti, Diastasis Recti Abdominis (DRA)
Pátrai, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT06715059
Diastasis Recti, Diastasis Recti And Weakness Of The Linea Alba
Istanbul, KAgıthane, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06214650
Diastasis, Diastasis Recti
View Trial DetailsNCT06286553
Diastasis Recti And Weakness Of The Linea Alba, Diastasis, Muscle
Pátrai, Greece
View Trial Details