Cleveland Clinic, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065, United States
NCT Number: NCT04668885
The purpose of this study is to evaluate how effective lower doses of CPX-351 are in older participants with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are not eligible to receive intensive chemotherapy and in participants with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) after Hypomethylating Agents (HMA) failure.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me60 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065, United States
Currently, elderly patients with AML and high risk MDS, who are ineligible to receive induction chemotherapy and fail HMA +/- combination, have very poor outcomes and there is no FDA-approved therapy outside of some targeted therapies which can only be applied to a small patient population. CPX-351 is an investigational (experimental) drug that works by combining two anti-cancer drugs cytarabine and daunorubicin. CPX-351 is experimental because it is only FDA approved for the treatment of adults with two types of AML: newly diagnosed therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes.
This is an open label clinical trial of lower doses of CPX-351 in relapsed/primary refractory older AML and MDS patients ineligible to receive intensive chemotherapy. The first arm is for particpants with primary refractory/relapsed AML and the second arm is for higher risk MDS participants after HMA failure.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Induction phase: CPX-351 15 mg/m^2 on days 1 and 3 of each 28-day cycle for up to a total of 6 cycles in the absence of unacceptable toxicity
Maintenance phase: CPX-351 7.5 mg/m^2 on days 1 and 3 for two cycles alternating with 15 mg/m^2 for one cycle. Participants may receive up to 12 cycles of maintenance phase in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.
Time frame: At 6 months
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
Time frame: At 1 year
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
Time frame: At 1.5 years
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
Time frame: At 2 years
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
Time frame: At 2.5 years
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
Time frame: At 3 years
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
Time frame: At 3.5 years
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
Time frame: At 4 years
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
Time frame: At 4.5 years
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
Time frame: At 5 years
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
Time frame: At 6 months
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 1 year
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 1.5 years
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 2 years
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 2.5 years
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 3 years
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 3.5 years
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 4 years
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 4.5 years
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 5 years
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 6 months
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 1 year
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 1.5 years
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 2 years
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 2.5 years
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 3 years
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 3.5 years
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 4 years
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 4.5 years
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 5 years
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
Time frame: At 6 months
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
Time frame: At 1 year
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
Time frame: At 1.5 years
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
Time frame: At 2 years
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
Time frame: At 2.5 years
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
Time frame: At 3 years
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
Time frame: At 3.5 years
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
Time frame: At 4 years
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
Time frame: At 4.5 years
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
Time frame: At 5 years
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause. Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
Time frame: At 6 months
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up. OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
Time frame: At 1 year
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up. OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
Time frame: At 1.5 years
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up. OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
Time frame: At 2 years
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up. OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
Time frame: At 2.5 years
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up. OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
Time frame: At 3 years
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up. OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
Time frame: At 3.5 years
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up. OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
Time frame: At 4 years
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up. OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
Time frame: At 4.5 years
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up. OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
Time frame: At 5 years
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up. OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Other
Lower Doses of CPX-351 as a Novel Approach for the Treatment of Older Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06501196
Bone Marrow Diseases, Hematologic Diseases
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06536959
Bone Marrow Diseases, Hematologic Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05146739
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Post Cytotoxic Therapy, Bone Marrow Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04128748
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Blasts More Than 10 Percent of Bone Marrow Nucleated Cells
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial Details