Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06406101

CPR Surface Choice on Chest Compression Quality

The objective of our randomized simulation study on mannequins with a population of Basic Life Support students is to compare the quality of chest compressions, taking depth as the main variable, in two simulated scenarios of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on a bed: one where Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation is performed on the bed and another where the patient is transferred to the ground for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hospital Clinic Barcelona

Barcelona, 08036, Spain

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Those individuals who sign the informed consent and do not meet exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Individuals with any limitation or contraindication for physical exercise:

  • Arthritis
  • Heart disease
  • Advanced lung disease
  • Severe physical disability
  • Morbid obesity
  • Chronic fatigue
  • Pregnancy

Withdrawal Criteria:

  • Those individuals who, due to limitations in physical exercise, do not reach 2 minutes of compressions
  • Students who have not obtained the certificate of successfully completing the course.

Treatment and study plan

Floor

Other

Uninterrupted 2-minute chest compressions on a manikin that has been moved from the bed to the floor in a simulated scenario of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Bed

Other

Uninterrupted 2-minute chest compressions on a manikin that is laying on bed in a simulated scenario of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Primary outcomes

  1. Compressions Mean Depth

    Time frame: On the day of the simulation

    Chest Compressions Mean Depth

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to first chest compression

    Time frame: On the day of the simulation

    The time it takes to initiate chest compressions.

  2. Effectiveness of Chest Compressions

    Time frame: On the day of the simulation

    Global Punctuation of Chest Compressions in Skillreporter app.

  3. Total number of chest compressions

    Time frame: On the day of the simulation

    Total number of chest compressions

  4. Percentage of chest compressions whit correct depth (5-6cm)

    Time frame: On the day of the simulation

    Percentage of compressions whit correct depth (5-6cm)

  5. Mean frequency of chest compressions

    Time frame: On the day of the simulation

    Mean frequency of chest compressions

  6. Percentage of chest compressions with correct frequency

    Time frame: On the day of the simulation

    Percentage of chest compressions with correct frequency

  7. Percentage of chest compressions with correct position of hands

    Time frame: On the day of the simulation

    Percentage of chest compressions with correct position of hands

  8. Percentage of chest compressions with correct release

    Time frame: On the day of the simulation

    Percentage of chest compressions with correct release

  9. Borg Scale for Fatigability

    Time frame: On the day of the simulation

    The scale includes a rating of 6 perceiving "no exertion at all" to 20 perceiving a "maximal exertion" of effort.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Influence of CPR Surface Choice on Chest Compression Quality: A Randomized Manikin Study Comparing Bed and Floor Settings

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
May 9, 2024
Registry last updated
Oct 8, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.