Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01117896

CPR Rescuer Fatigue on Chest Compression Effectiveness

This prospective, randomized experimental trial to determine whether the quality of healthcare provider/rescuer chest compressions (CC) deteriorates at the same rate in pediatric models as compared to adult models. To determine the relationship between physiologic/metabolic markers of work in rescuers and chest compression deterioration, and to determine the effect of stepstool use on the quality of chest compressions and metabolic demand. To determine whether the quality of chest compressions deteriorates at the same rate in participants using a stepstool compared to those not using a stepstool.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

22 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

About this study

Context:

Pediatric cardiac arrests result in poor outcomes. Effective chest compressions improve survival in such patients. Unfortunately, compressions are generally inadequately performed and the quality of compressions given deteriorates rapidly with time. Current American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines call for faster and deeper chest compressions with minimization of interruptions. The effect of fatigue on operational performance while adhering strictly to these AHA guidelines is unknown. In addition, there is little pediatric data on rescuer fatigue and chest compression deterioration. Also, the use of a stepstool may affect the quality of chest compressions and may also have an impact on the fatigue of the rescuer. Understanding the biomechanics during optimal chest compression performance may prove useful in the recommendations of conditions and equipment for execution of more effective chest compressions during a cardiac arrest. We will aim to observe and understand the biomechanical qualities that allow for the most effective compressions.

Objectives:

  • To determine whether the quality of chest compressions deteriorates at the same rate in pediatric models as compared to adult models. To determine the relationship between physiologic/metabolic markers of work in rescuers and chest compression deterioration.
  • To determine the effect of stepstool use on the quality of chest compressions and metabolic demand. To determine whether the quality of chest compressions deteriorates at the same rate in participants using a stepstool compared to those not using a stepstool.

Study Design/Setting/Participants:

This prospective, randomized experimental trial will be performed at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Participants will be healthcare practitioners who routinely provide chest compressions in the course of their work. Lay practitioners will be excluded.

Study Measures:

Participants will be asked to perform continuous chest compressions on pediatric and adult sized manikins. Compression rate, depth, applied force as well as participant physiologic work efficiency and anaerobic threshold will be recorded. To evaluate the second objective, a new cohort of participants will perform continuous chest compressions on an adult sized manikin with and without a stepstool.. Compression rate, depth, applied force as well as participant physiologic work efficiency and anaerobic threshold will also be recorded. Videotaping of each subject will also be used for comparison of subjective assessment of chest compression quality and objective chest compression quality data.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males or females age 22 to 65 years.
  • Resident physicians, fellows, attendings, nurses and emergency medical technicians (EMTs) who routinely perform chest compressions in the Critical Care units and Emergency Department.

Exclusion criteria

  • Lay practitioners
  • Pregnant women
  • Chronic medical Condition limiting exertional capacity

Treatment and study plan

Chest compression on adult and pedi manikins

Other

Each participant will be required to perform chest compressions on all 2 manikins, one on each of 2 assigned days. Participants will be randomized to one of 2 groups differing only in the order of manikins compressed, i.e. pediatric-adult; adult-pediatric, etc.

Other names: chest compression on adult manikins, chest compression on pedi manikins

Use of stepstool during chest compressions

Other

In the additional arm of the study, a new cohort of participants will use only the adult manikin on two separate sessions. Participants will be randomized to one of two groups differing only in the use of a stepstool.

Other names: chest compression adult manikin

Primary outcomes

  1. Compression Quality

    Time frame: 2 years

    The primary endpoint will be the difference in mean number of effective compressions per minute in each manikin at times 1, 2, 5 and 10 minutes.

  2. Metabolic expenditure

    Time frame: 2 years

    The endpoint will be the difference between mean time to ineffective compressions (defined as 10 consecutive compressions that fail to meet AHA guidelines for depth and rate) and mean time to anaerobic threshold in each manikin.

  3. Effect of Step stool use

    Time frame: 3 years

    The endpoint will be the difference between mean time to ineffective compressions (defined as 10 consecutive compressions that fail to meet AHA guidelines for depth and rate) and mean time to anaerobic threshold in each experimental group.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score

    Time frame: 3 years

    Correlation between VAS score and time to ineffective compressions

  2. Physiologic measures and CC quality

    Time frame: 3 years

    Correlation between physiologic measures [anaerobic threshold, Minute oxygen consumption (VO2), Minute carbon dioxide production (VCO2), Oxygen pulse (O2P), Maximal minute ventilation (VE) and Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER)] and time to ineffective compressions;

  3. Effect of stepstool use on duration of effective compressions.

    Time frame: 3 yrs

  4. • Correlation of subjective reviewer rating and quantitative objective chest compression quality.

    Time frame: 3 years

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effect of Rescuer Fatigue on Chest Compression Effectiveness

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2012
First posted
May 6, 2010
Registry last updated
Oct 26, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.