The University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
NCT Number: NCT07036198
The project will develop brief interventions that allow participants to customize which groups they receive feedback for in relation to things such as drinking norms for younger or older students, student athletes, etc. The goal is to provide content that is meaningful and engaging to all users.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–24 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
The project will develop and pilot test an innovative paradigm for leveraging social norms within brief interventions that entails user customization of which (and how many) normative referent groups they receive feedback for so that the content is meaningful and engaging to all users.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
N/A
The CPNF intervention allows individuals to explore normative feedback for a wider variety of referent groups so that PNF is a truly personalized and engaging experience.
Correcting misperceptions about peers' alcohol use behaviors and contrasting one's own use to the actual norms of their peers.
Participants in the AMC condition will complete all measures at the same time as participants in the CPNF condition but will not receive any information on drinking norms. Instead, participants in the AMC will receive normative feedback on sleep health, video game use, and gambling behaviors, and will similarly be able to choose the normative referent groups they wish to view feedback on for these behaviors. The AMC will thus serve as a non-treatment comparison that controls for assessment reactivity and effects of history and maturation.
Time frame: Screening, Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
Daily Drinking Questionnaire will assess drinks on average over the past month by recording the number of drinks consumed on each day of a typical week. Response options range from 0 drinks to 25+ drinks. Lower score is a better outcome, higher score is a worse outcome.
Time frame: Screening, Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
Quantity/Frequency/Peak Alcohol Use Index will assess amount of alcohol consumed over the past month with how many days alcohol was consumed, average consumption, and peak consumption. Response options range from 0 to 30 days for frequency, and 1 to 12+ drinks for quantity and peak. Lower score is a better outcome, higher score is a worse outcome.
Time frame: Screening, Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
Heavy Episodic Drinking measure will assess how many times over the past month heavy drinking episodes occurred, defined as 4 or more drinks (females) or 5 or more drinks (males) on a single occasion. Response options range from 0 to 7 days. Lower score is a better outcome, higher score is a worse outcome.
Time frame: Screening, Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
Electronic Blood Alcohol content will be assessed and calculated using peak drinks over x amount of time. A lower BAC is a better outcome, a higher BAC is a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
The AUDIT is a 10-item self-report screening tool assessing hazardous and harmful alcohol use over the past year. Items are rated on varying 5-point Likert-type scales assessing frequency, quantity, and consequences of alcohol use. Lower score is a better outcome, higher score is a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
The Brief YAACQ is a 24-item assessment of alcohol-related consequences in young adults. Response options for the items are yes or no. Higher score (i.e. more 'yes' responses) is a worse outcome, lower score (i.e. more 'no' responses) is a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
Gathered via Shortened Drinking Norms Rating Form. 7 items assess belief for what's an acceptable number of drinks each day of the week with responses ranging from 0 to 25+ drinks.
Time frame: Baseline, Follow-ups, an average of 3 months
Gathered via the Injunctive Drinking Norms Rating Form. 7 items assess belief for what a typical UW college student drinks on each day of each day of the week with responses ranging from 0 to 25+ drinks.
University of Washington
Other
A User-Customizable Personalized Normative Feedback Intervention for Alcohol Harm Reduction in Young Adults: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy
Acronym: Project SHIFT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06982443
Alcohol Drinking, Alcohol Use
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07654205
Alcohol Drinking, Alcohol Use
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07441603
Alcohol Drinking, Alcohol Use
Greifswald, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT06713304
Alcohol Drinking, Alcohol Use
Bangkok, Thailand
View Trial Details