Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03793673

CoYoT1 to California

CoYoT1 to California (CTC) was initiated to develop a patient-centered, home telehealth care model for young adults (YA) ages 16-25 with T1D. It is a 2x2 factorial design, 15-month intervention. Eighty participants will be randomized to Standard Care or CoYoT1 Care, which is delivered by telehealth or in-person. CoYoT1 Care is a patient-centered care model that consists of three major components: shared decision making (patient and provider agree upon priorities for the medical visit), autonomy and supportive care (provider training in communication strategies such as motivational interviewing), and goal setting and action planning (provider training to coach YA in setting SMART goals, developing action plans, and designing follow up plans). Additionally, didactic expert-led sessions (Standard Care) or peer-led, YA-driven group sessions (CoYoT1 Care) are included. At the end of the study, a focus group will be completed to assist in determining which features YA felt were critical to their success from the telehealth intervention, group components, and provider behaviors.

***COVID-19 Update: Due to current hospital and clinical policy adaptation for COVID-19, all participants who were randomized into in-person appointments will now receive care via Telehealth. Telehealth has been implemented hospital-wide and will be the temporary delivery of care method during this pandemic. Participants have been notified of this change and given instruction on how to participate in a Telehealth appointment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

16 year–25 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Children's Hospital

Los Angeles, California, 90027, United States

About this study

  • Standard Care - Standard (in -person) appointments
  • Usual medical appointments.
  • Opportunity to participate in available community and CHLA based educational and support events.
  • Complete online assessments/questionnaires.
  • Invitation to a 2 hour audio-recorded discussion at the end of the study
  • COVID-19 Update: Current clinic appointments consist of telehealth appointments only. Any additional community and CHLA based educational and support events will be following COVID-19 guidelines.
  • Standard Care - Telehealth appointments
  • Telehealth - with provider and/or team. Online video appointments every 3 months, upload diabetes data to Tidepool, and do routine blood work at a facility near you
  • Opportunity to participate in available community and CHLA based educational and support events
  • Complete online assessments/questionnaires
  • Invitation to a 2 hour audio-recorded discussion at the end of the study
  • COVID-19 Update: Any community and CHLA based educational and support events will be following COVID-19 guidelines. If in-person routine bloodwork is not feasible, HbA1c kits will be provided to participants.
  • CoYoT1 Care - Standard Appointment
  • In-person - medical appointments with provider and/or team
  • Opportunity to participate in 30-60 minute online peer-led diabetes group discussions
  • Complete online assessments/questionnaires
  • Invitation to a 2 hour audio-recorded discussion at the end of the study
  • COVID-19 Update: Current clinic appointments consist of telehealth appointments only.
  • CoYoT1 Care - Telehealth appointments
  • Telehealth - with provider and/or team. Online video appointment every 3 months, upload your diabetes data to Tidepool, and do routine blood work at a facility near you
  • Opportunity to participate in 30-60 minute online peer-led diabetes group discussions
  • Complete online assessments/questionnaires
  • Invitation to a 2 hour audio-recorded discussion at the end of the study
  • COVID-19 Update: If in-person routine bloodwork is not feasible, HbA1c kits will be provided to participants.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Any patient aged 16-25 years of age on their date of recruitment who has had T1D for at least 6 months.
  • Receiving or pending care at CHLA
  • Has California Children's Services (CCS), self-pay, and/or private insurance (excluding United and Healthnet insurance)
  • Does not plan to transfer out of CHLA within the next year

Exclusion criteria

  • Any patient with severe behavioral or developmental disabilities
  • Severe psychological diagnoses that would make group participation difficult
  • Pregnancy
  • Non-English speaking patients and families
  • Has United or Healthnet private insurance
  • Literacy or cognitive issues that preclude the use of the Internet

Treatment and study plan

CoYoT1 Care

Behavioral

Selected providers will be trained in the CoYoT1 Care protocol for completing medical appointments (both telehealth/standard appointments). There are three key components: (1) Shared decision making: Providers and YA will mutually agree on priorities for each medical visit using a shared decision making tool completed by both the provider and patient. (2) Autonomy supportive care: Providers will be trained in communication strategies, such as motivational interviewing, designed to support YA autonomy and intrinsic motivation. YA will also direct extent of eligible family involvement. (3) Goal setting and action planning: Providers will be trained to coach YA in setting SMART goals, developing action plans, and establishing a plan for follow-up between visits as appropriate.

Standard care

Other

Providers selected for the Standard Care group will complete medical appointments in their usual manner, without specific training or guidelines regarding how to deliver care.

NOTE: Per COVID-19 hospital policies, current clinic appointments consist of telehealth appointments.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with completed appointments in telemedicine cohort

    Time frame: 12 months

    Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Abstraction - number of appointments; multiple choice and open ended

  2. Number of participants with completed appointments in telemedicine cohort

    Time frame: 12 months

    Patient online attendance as assessed using an online patient experience questionnaire - Polar Questions; Yes or no response questions related to patient's online appointment (i.e., did you have an online appointment? Did you attend your appointment?)

  3. Number of participants with completed medical appointments in standard care cohort

    Time frame: 12 months

    In-person patient appointment attendance assessed using an online patient experience questionnaire. Polar questions; Yes or No response questions related to patient's in-person appointment (i.e., did you have an in-person appointment? Did you attend your in-person appointment?

  4. Patient and Provider Satisfaction as assessed using the Health Care Climate questionnaire

    Time frame: 12 months

    : Likert scale "Very dissatisfied" is 1, "Dissatisfied" is 2, "Neutral" is 3, "Satisfied" is 4, and "Very Satisfied" is 5. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction, lower scores indicate low satisfaction

  5. Provider Experience as assessed using the CAHPS survey

    Time frame: 12 months

    Cultural Competence Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) - likert Scale; range 0-10, low range indicates low trust and high values indicate trust.

  6. Patient Satisfaction with appointment type as assessed using the Updated CoYoT1 Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Time frame: [Time Frame: For each visit (until the end of study) - 12 months]

    Likert scale; "Strongly disagree" is 1, "Somewhat disagree" is 2, "Neutral" is 3, "Somewhat Agree" is 4, and "Strongly Agree" is 5. Scores are summed and the average is taken; higher scores is more self-efficacy

  7. Provider Satisfaction as assessed using the Satisfaction Provider survey

    Time frame: 12 months

    Telehealth Utilization satisfaction as assessed using a telehealth satisfaction questionnaire. Likert scale; range 1-5, low values indicate low satisfaction and higher values indicate high satisfaction. Polar: Yes or No response questions, "Would you use telehealth again?" Open ended; patient comments about experience.

  8. Patient Experience

    Time frame: 12 months

    Patient Experience Measures Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) - likert Scale; range 0-10; lower range represents low rating, higher ranges indicate higher rating

  9. Social Determinants of Health Tool

    Time frame: At 0 (baseline)

    Social determinants of health as assessed using a social and environmental factors questionnaire. Polar; Yes or No questions about food insecurity and transportation, "did you worry that your food would run out before you got money to buy more?" "have you or your family ever been unable to go to the doctor because of distance or transportation?"

Secondary outcomes

  1. Costs to Patients

    Time frame: 12 months

    Transportation cost to patient as assessed using a Transportation Questionnaire. Multiple choice questions about mode of transportation used to get to appointment, "driving own vehicle," "riding public transit," "ride with family member or friend." Open ended to assess cost of parking, bus fare.

  2. Costs to Patients

    Time frame: 12 months

    Number of patients with need for a technology device (cellphone) as assessed using a Device Assessment questionnaire. Polar; Yes or No question about access to personal device patient has for online appointment, "do you have a personal device to access the internet?." Multiple choice questions about device; "Mobile phone," "Laptop," "Tablet," "Ethernet," "Wi-Fi."

  3. Costs to Patients

    Time frame: 12 months

    Diabetes visit expenses questions - polar questions, multiple choice, and open-ended

  4. Cost to Instituition

    Time frame: 12 months

    Cost to Institution as assessed by Patient Health Utilization questionnaire. Polar; Yes or No questions about health service usage in the last three months, "have you had to be admitted to the hospital?" Open-ended question about number of time health services were used, "how many times were you admitted to the hospital for reasons related to diabetes?"

  5. Cost to Instituition

    Time frame: 12 months

    Cost to Institution as assessed using the Online Appointment questionnaire. Polar; Yes or No questions about attendance to online appointment. "Did you attend your online appointment?" "What types of providers did you see?" Open-ended questions asking about time, "how long did it take?"

  6. Cost to Instituition

    Time frame: 12 months

    Cost to Institution as assessed using the In-Person Appointment questionnaire. Polar; Yes or No questionnaire about appointment attendance; "did you attend an in-person appointment?" "How long was your in-person appointment?" Open-ended questions about time, "how long did it take?"

  7. Cost to Instituition

    Time frame: 12 months

    Cost to Institution as assessed using the Clinic Cost, Preparation, and Delivery for Providers and Staff questionnaire. Multiple choice questions about person (Doctor, Nurse and Social Worker) and appointment type provided to patient

  8. Cost to Instituition

    Time frame: 12 months

    Cost to Institution as assessed using Team Costs of Provider and Staff Training questionnaire. Multiple choice questions used to identify person being trained, "Doctor," "Nurse Practitioner," "Social Worker." Polar; Yes or No questions about provider and staff training for telehealth appointment; training on, "camera and mic," "loading Webex platform."

  9. Glycemic Control at Baseline

    Time frame: HbA1c for the last 12 months

    Lab Results: Electronic Medical Record Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) %

  10. Glycemic Control Progression

    Time frame: For each visit (until the end of study) - 12 months

    Lab Results: Electronic Medical Record Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) %

  11. Cost to Payor

    Time frame: 12 months (monthly)

    Cost to Payor as assessed using Health Care Utilization Online questionnaire. Polar; Yes and No questions about patient use of health services, "In the last 3 months, has 911 been called because of your diabetes?" Open-ended questions about rate of health service use, "how many times was 911 called?"

  12. Cost to Payor

    Time frame: 12 months

    Cost to payor as assessed using Clinic Cost, Preparation, and Delivery questionnaire for Providers or Staff. Open ended questions about length of training and technology used, along with any comments about appointment delivery.

  13. Cost to Payor

    Time frame: 12 months

    Cost to payor as assessed using the Team Costs of Provider or Staff questionnaire. Open ended question asking about length of training and training required on "billing process," "data collection process," "camera and mic."

  14. Cost to Payor as as assessed using the Team Costs- YA

    Time frame: 12 months

    Multiple Choice and fill-in. Questions about time spent training young adults and training required on "Agenda setting", "Camera and Mic", "Loading Webex platform".

Other outcomes

  1. Self-care, mobility, and anxiety and depression as assessed using the EuroQOL five dimensions five levels questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire.

    Time frame: At 0 (baseline) and 12 months (after visit 4)

    Likert scale; used to measure respondents' endorsement of particular statements. Descriptive system top answer is 1 and last answer is 5. Missing items will be coded as 9. Online software used to score.

  2. Depressive symptoms assessed using the Center of Epidemiologic Studies Scale (CES-D)

    Time frame: At 0 (baseline) and 12 months (after visit 4)

    "Rarely or none of the time (less than 1 day)" is 0, "Some or a little of the time (1-2 days)" is 1, "Occasionally or a moderate amount of time" is 2, "Most or all of the time (5-7 days)" is 3. The scoring of positive items is reversed. Possible range of scores is zero to 60, with the higher scores indicating the presence of more symptomatology.

  3. Patient health-related quality of life as assessed using the Your Health and Well-being Short-Form 12 item Version 2 (SF12V2) measure

    Time frame: At 0 (baseline) and 12 months (after visit 4)

    Likert scale; "Excellent" is 1, "Very good" is 2, "Good" is 3, "Fair" is 4, and "Poor" is 5. An algorithm is used to generate the physical and mental health composite scores for comparison (a confirmatory factor analyses).Items are scored so that a higher score indicates a better health state.

  4. Dimensions of distress (e.g., emotional burden, regimen distress, interpersonal distress and physician distress) as assessed using the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)

    Time frame: At 0 (baseline) and 12 months (after visit 4)

    Likert scale; "Not a problem" is 1, "A slight problem" is 2, "A moderate problem" is 3, "Somewhat serious problem" is 4, "A Serious Problem" is 5, and "A very serious problem" is 6. There are 4 subscales that address the dimensions of distress and to score, the appropriate item(s) are summed and divided by appropriate number. A mean item score of 3 or higher is considered moderate distress.

    burden, regimen distress, interpersonal distress and physician distress; likert scale

  5. Assessment of Diabetes-Related Psychosocial Self-Efficacy

    Time frame: At 0 (baseline) and 12 months (after visit 4)

    Diabetes-related psychosocial self-efficacy as assessed using the Diabetes Empowerment Scale Short Form (DES-SF); Likert scale; "Strongly disagree" is 1, "Somewhat disagree" is 2, "Neutral" is 3, "Somewhat Agree" is 4, and "Strongly Agree" is 5. Scores are summed and the average is taken; higher scores is more self-efficacy

  6. Self Care - Realted to Diabetes as assessed by Self-Care questionnaire

    Time frame: [At 0 (baseline) and each visit (until the end of study) - 12 months]

    Multiple Choice. Questions about diabetes related self care, "How many hours per day do you currently devote to managing your glucose levels?"

  7. CoYoT1 Care - Tools Questions

    Time frame: [At 12 months or Visit 4]

    Record keeping for tools to give to patients in transition to non-study visits (ie: Shared Decision Making tool and Tidepool)

  8. Standard Care - Tools Questions

    Time frame: [At 12 months or Visit 4]

    Record keeping for tools to give to patients in transition to non-study visits (ie:Tidepool)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Other

Collaborators

  • Rutgers University
  • University of Southern California

Registry information

Official study title

CoYoT1 to California - Telemedicine to Engage Young Adults With Diabetes

Acronym: CTC

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jan 4, 2019
Registry last updated
Mar 15, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.