Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04546451

Countervail Cognitive and Cerebral Decline in Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients Using Non-medical Interventions

Cognitive decline represents a major threat among the deleterious effects of population aging. The investigators propose to conduct an RCT (randomized controlled trial) on the subpopulation of MCI patients, and examine whether intensive musical or psychomotor group interventions can improve their cognitive and sensorimotor functioning, as well as induce brain plasticity, compared to a passive healthy control group, matched for age, gender and education level. The 2 training regimens will take place twice a week over 6 months and will be provided by professionals in each field.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

60 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

CHUV: Centre Leenaards Memory Center, Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Background Regular cognitive training can boost or maintain cognitive and brain functions known to decline with age. Most studies administered such cognitive training on a computer and in a lab setting. However, everyday life activities, like musical practice or physical exercise that are complex and variable, could be more successful at inducing transfer effects to different cognitive domains and maintaining motivation. "Body-mind exercises", like Tai Chi or psychomotor exercise, may also positively affect cognitive functioning in the elderly. We will investigate the influence of active music practice and psychomotor training over 6 months in Mild Cognitive Impairment patients from university hospital memory clinics on cognitive and sensorimotor performance and brain plasticity.

Methods We aim to conduct a randomized controlled (RCT) multicenter intervention study on 32 Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) patients (60-80 years), divided over 2 experimental groups: 1) Music practice; 2) Psychomotor treatment. Controls will consist of a passive test-retest group of 16 age, gender and education level matched healthy volunteers.

The training regimens take place twice a week for 45 minutes over 6 months in small groups, provided by professionals, and patients should exercise daily at home. Data collection takes place at baseline (before the interventions), 3, and 6 months after training onset, on cognitive and sensorimotor capacities, subjective well-being, daily living activities, and via functional and structural neuroimaging. Considering the current constraints of the ongoing COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease of 2019) pandemic, recruitment and data collection takes place in 2 waves.

Discussion We will investigate whether musical practice or psychomotor exercise in small groups can improve cognitive, sensorimotor and brain functioning in MCI patients, and therefore provoke benefits for their daily life functioning and well-being.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • MCI diagnosis by experts at the memory clinics
  • MMSE score (Mini-Mental State Examination) > 22 or MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) > 18
  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) < 14 (< 7/21 for anxiety and < 7/21 for depression)
  • Age between 60 and 80 years
  • Right-handedness
  • Fluent in French
  • Able to give informed consent as documented by signature

Exclusion criteria

  • Serious motor deficits
  • Impaired/not-corrected hearing
  • Serious physical and mental comorbidities
  • Participation in physical or cognitive training over the last 12 months
  • Maximum 5 years of official music education over the lifespan outside the school curriculum or during the last 3 years
  • Intensive physical activity over the last 12 months (sports or body-mind exercises)
  • Left-handed or ambidextrous
  • MRI incompatibility (claustrophobia, cardiac stimulator, implants…)

Nota bene: for brain organizational reasons exclusively right-handed participants will be included. Right-handed persons represent more than 90% of the population (Isaacs, Barr, Nelson, & Devinsky, 2006., doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000219623.28769.74.)

Treatment and study plan

Music practice

Behavioral

Patients will be trained to play a simple instrument (tongue-drum) in a group setting using different musical styles.

Psychomotor therapy

Behavioral

Patients will be trained in body awareness and a wide range of of movement activities.

Primary outcomes

  1. Cognitive Telephone Screening Instrument (COGTEL)

    Time frame: 6 months

    This test can be applied by telephone or face-to-face (in this study we will apply the face-to-face method). The outcome consists of increase or less decrease (experimental group 1 or 2 vs. the control group) of the total weighted score at the COGTEL test directly after the 6 months interventions as compared to directly before the interventions.

    The COGTEL test provides a main weighted score of core cognitive function, it comprises 6 subtests covering prospective memory, short- and long-term verbal memory, working memory (digit span), verbal fluency and inductive reasoning.

    COGTEL main weighted score: COGTEL Total score = 7.2 x Prospective Memory score + 1.0 x Verbal Short-Term Memory score + 0.9 x Verbal Long-Term Memory score + 0.8 x Working Memory score + 0.2 x Verbal Fluency score + 1.7 x Inductive Reasoning score

    (Kliegel, Martin, & Jager, 2007, doi:10.3200/JRLP.141.2.147-172) (lhle et al., 2017, doi:10.1159/000479680)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Individual subtests of the COGTEL (Cognitive Telephone Screening Instrument)

    Time frame: 6 months

    Individual subtests of the COGTEL: prospective memory, short- and long-term verbal memory, working memory (digit span), verbal fluency, and inductive reasoning; the outcome consists of increase or less decrease (experimental group 1 or 2 vs. the control group) of each subtest score directly after the 6 months interventions as compared to directly before the interventions.

  2. D2-R test

    Time frame: 6 months

    D2-R test (attention, processing speed): correct responses/hits minus errors/omissions; the outcome consists of increase or less decrease (experimental group 1 or 2 vs. the control group) of the total score directly after the 6 months interventions as compared to directly before the interventions.

  3. Trail making test

    Time frame: 6 months

    Trail making test A (visual processing speed) & B (visual processing speed & cognitive flexibility): time to complete the test A and B; the outcome consists in decrease or less increase in time to complete the tests (experimental group 1 or 2 vs. the control group) directly after the 6 months interventions as compared to directly before the interventions.

  4. Go/No-Go

    Time frame: 6 months

    Go/No-Go (inhibition): number of errors ; the outcome consists of decrease or less increase (experimental group 1 or 2 vs. the control group) of the total score directly after the 6 months interventions as compared to directly before the interventions.

  5. International Matrix Test (Oldenburg)

    Time frame: 6 months

    Speech-in-noise perception test. The outcome is a score of Speech Reception Threshold (SRT), measured for both ears and each ear separately (Kollmeier et al., 2105, doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971).

  6. fMRI visual working memory task

    Time frame: 6 months

    fMRI letter n-back visual working memory task (Migo et al., 2015, doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2014.894958): correct responses; the outcome consists of increase or less decrease (experimental group 1 or 2 vs. the control group) of the total score directly after the 6 months interventions as compared to directly before the interventions.

  7. Sensorimotor function

    Time frame: 6 months

    Higher total score of the following sensorimotor tests in the 2 experimental intervention groups as compared to the active control group directly after the 6 months interventions as compared to directly before the interventions.

    • Clock drawing test (assessing apraxia) (Aprahamian, Martinelli, Neri, & Yassuda, 2009, doi: 10.1590/S1980-57642009DN30200002)
    • Purdue Pegboard (assessing manual dexterity) (Tiffin & Asher, 1948, doi: 10.1037/h0061266)
    • Unipedal balance test (Bohannon & Tudini, 2018; doi:10.1016/j.physio.2018.04.001)
    • Laterality test (assessing left/right judgements) (Williams et al., 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.01.010)
  8. Short Version of the Amsterdam Instrumental Activity of the Daily Living Questionnaire (A-IADL-Q(SV))

    Time frame: 6 months

    Daily living activities: improved daily living activities as measured by the A-IADL-Q(SV; Short Version of the Amsterdam Instrumental Activity of the Daily Living Questionnaire) in the 2 experimental intervention groups as compared to the control group directly after the 6 months interventions as compared to directly before the interventions (Jutten et al., 2017, doi:10.1016/j.dadm.2017.03.002).

  9. World Health Organization Quality of Life Instruments - short Version WHOQOL-BREF (abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life; WHO 1996)

    Time frame: 6 months

    Subjective well-being: improved subjective well-being in both intervention groups as measured by the WHOQOL-BREF (1996) directly after the 6 months interventions as compared to directly before the interventions. (Organization, W. H. (1996). WHOQOL-BREF: introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment: field trial version, December 1996.)

  10. Emotional regulation questionnaire (ERQ)

    Time frame: 6 months

    Emotional regulation: improved emotional regulation in the experimental groups as compared to the control group directly after the 6 months interventions as compared to directly before the interventions (Christophe et al., 2009 doi: 10.1016/j.erap.2008.07.001).

  11. Magnetization Prepared 2 Rapid Gradient Echo (MP2RAGE)

    Time frame: 6 months

    MP2RAGE is an extension of the conventional MPRAGE pulse sequence widely used in clinical studies. It involves gray matter volume assessment, allowing to evaluate gray matter changes following learning of new skills (Marques & Gruetter, 2013, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069294).

  12. Functional MRI (fMRI)

    Time frame: 6 months

    Letter N-back visual working memory task (Migo et al., 2015, doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2014.894958). Allows evaluating visual working memory performance following learning of new skills.

  13. Resting state functional MRI (RS-fMRI)

    Time frame: 6 months

    RS-fMRI assesses activity in the Default Mode Network (DMN) reflecting global functional connectivity of the brain (Leonardi et al., 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.019). Allows evaluating functional connectivity changes following learning of new skills.

  14. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)

    Time frame: 6 months

    DTI allows computing i.a. Fractional Anisotropy for evaluating white matter integrity reflecting structural connectivity (Bosch et al., 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.02.004). Allows evaluating structural connectivity changes following learning of new skills.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

School of Health Sciences Geneva

Other

Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Geneva
  • University of Geneva, Switzerland
  • University of Lausanne Hospitals

Registry information

Official study title

Musical and Psychomotor Interventions for Cognitive, Sensorimotor, and Cerebral Decline in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment (COPE): a Study Protocol for a Multicentric Randomized Controlled Study

Acronym: COPE

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Sep 14, 2020
Registry last updated
Jun 1, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.