Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03775551

Counter-referral System Improvement Collaborative

Coordination between different levels of care has been identified as one of the main components of care among people with chronic diseases. In this sense, an adequate referral and counter-reference system facilitates the management of the care process with timely access to the required referral. The objective of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of a multicomponent strategy that improves the counter- referral process in patients with cardiovascular diseases in the public health system.

Population: The study will be carried out in selected hospitals of the provinces of Mendoza, Tucumán and Salta in Argentina. Patients who have been hospitalized with a diagnosis of heart failure, hypertension (requires hospitalization) and / or coronary disease (unstable angina) will be included.

Design and methods: a Randomized clinical study by clusters. 10 hospital will be included: 5 will be randomly assigned to receive an intervention to increase the improve counter referral rates (improvement cycles) and 5 to the control branch (usual care). 51 participants will be included in each hospital, in total, 510 participants.

Intervention: An innovative vision is proposed, which combines a participatory and dynamic methodology based on improvement cycles. This approach includes the implementation of participatory learning sessions for health providers, involving the effectors of the design of the intervention. In the intervention branch at least 6 workshops (sessions) will be held with the members of the care system, in order to identify opportunities for improvement oriented to the design and application of an innovative intervention based on best practices. Each one of the sessions will constitute an analysis of the improvement cycle, following the following steps: 1) Selection of participants of the initial workshop; 2) Development of work model based on bibliographic review and initial qualitative phase; 3) Initial workshop with effectors for training in continuous improvement, objectives, interventions and data collection; 4) Learning workshops to discuss results, applicability of interventions and modifications to the work plan; 5) Closing session to evaluate preliminary results and discuss continuity of interventions beyond the project.

Outcomes: 1) consultation in the PHC after hospital discharge; 2) readmission's; 3) consultations in the hospital; 4) follow-up in the PHC; 5) patient perspective (satisfaction).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hospital A Italo Perrupato, San Martin, Mendoza Province, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects that only have public health coverage or PAMI
  • Adults over 18 year of age
  • Patients admitted to the hospital with diagnosis of: non valvular heart failure and/or complicated hypertension ( that requires hospitalization) and/or coronary heart disease ( unstable angina)
  • Residence in the area of influence of the hospitals

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women
  • Anticoagulated patients
  • People who are immobilized
  • People who do not give their informed consent
  • People who plan to move in the next 3 months

Treatment and study plan

Improvement cycle

Behavioral

at least 6 workshops (sessions) will be held with the members of the care system, in order to identify opportunities for improvement oriented to the design and application of an innovative intervention based on best practices.

Other names: quality improvement cycle

Primary outcomes

  1. Patients visits in a primary health center (PHC) after hospital discharge

    Time frame: 3 months after enrollment and/or end of study

    proportion of visits made in a primary care center (PHC) after hospital discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effective counter reference performed by physicians

    Time frame: 3 months after enrollment and/or end of study

    proportion of documented ( written) counter references by hospital physicians to a PHC

  2. Time to the first consultation in a PHC after the hospital discharge

    Time frame: 3 months after enrollment and/or .end of study

    mean number of days upon patient hospital discharged to the first visit in a primary care center

  3. Cardiovascular hospital readmission's

    Time frame: 3 months after enrollment and/or end of study

    proportion of re-admissions for the same primary admission condition for which the patient was discharged within the first 90 days

  4. Cardiovascular re consultations at the second level of care

    Time frame: 3 months after enrollment and/or end of study

    proportions of cardiovascular consultations at the secondary level of care after hospital discharge that should have been performed at the first level of care related to the condition for which the patient was included and admitted to the hospital

  5. Patients satisfaction with the primary health level measured by adapted PCAT questions

    Time frame: 4 months

    patients satisfaction with the health care provided at the PHC measured by adapted PTCA questions. The Primary Care Assessment Tool was design to evaluate attainment of features in primary care settings. Attributes identified by the tool are first contact accessibility and use, continuity, and coordination in the primary level. The tool has been adapted and validated in several countries and settings. The global index for evaluation will be composed as the sum of 10 items, ranging from 10 to 40. To facilitate interpretation the score will be transformed to a scale of 0 -100 points ( score =100 x (sum -10)/40-10), with higher score indicating more favorable satisfaction.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy

Other

Collaborators

  • Ministry of Public Health, Argentina

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an Improvement Collaborative Strategy to Improve the Counter-referral System of Patients With Cardiovascular Disease in the Public Healthcare Sector in Argentina

Acronym: BIDCR-R

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Dec 14, 2018
Registry last updated
Apr 23, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.