Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01679054

Cost-minimization Analysis of Gastric Cancer Treatments in Hong Kong

This is a retrospective cost-minimization analysis study to compare the costs of treatment with EOF vs EOX regimens in patients with gastric cancer (GC) in Hong Kong. Patient baseline characteristics and cost data will be extracted from records and compared.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Princess Margaret Hospital

Kowloon, Hong Kong

About this study

Background

The oral chemotherapy agent Xeloda® was recently extended by the Hong Kong Hospital Authority as subsidized therapy for the treatment of colorectal cancer1. Xeloda®-based chemotherapy regimen has shown to be more cost-effective than 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) considering they had equivalent clinical efficacy in colorectal cancer treatment2,3. The total cost for 5-FU-based regimen was higher for the healthcare provider and society as a whole. Gastric cancer ranks fourth in cancer-related cause of death in the Hong Kong population4. 5-FU has known antitumor activity and has been used successfully in advanced gastric cancer (aGC) with cisplatin (FP), as well as with oxaliplatin ± epirubicin (FOLFOX4, EOF). When substituted with Xeloda®, the XP and EOX regimens have demonstrated to be noninferior in terms of progression-free survival when compared with FP and EOF, respectively5,6. In an economics evaluation done by the manufacturer for NICE submission on the use of Xeloda® for treatment of aGC, the use of XP regimen allowed a cost reduction while eliminating possible complication related to intravenous therapy7. Moreover, FOLFOX4, one of the common 5-FU-based regimens used locally, has demonstrated to produce a median overall survival of 10 months in advanced/metastatic gastric cancer patients8. An effect similar to that of EOX. Currently, there is no local data suggesting similar economic impact with Xeloda®-based regimen for gastric cancer when compared with 5-FU-based regimens. It is worthwhile to see if Xeloda®-based therapy for gastric cancer is a cost-effective alternative.

Study Objective

To compare retrospective costs of treatment with Xeloda®-based and 5-FU-based regiments in patients with advanced gastric cancer in Hong Kong.

Methods

This is a retrospective cost-minimization study to be conducted in a public hospital in Hong Kong. Sixty (60) gastric cancer patients will be identified from existing case records (30 who completed a Xeloda®-based regimen and 30 who completed a 5-FU-based regimen) in the study sites. Baseline characteristics from both groups prior to chemotherapy, including demographics, ECOG performance score, liver/renal function, metastases, and survival will be obtained. Cost data will also be extracted from patient records.

Information to be collected include cost of hospital admission and length of stay, outpatient visits, diagnostic tests and treatments, chemotherapy regimens, all other drug therapy, adverse side effect management, travel, and patient time. Baseline characteristics and costs will be compared. Descriptive statistics will be utilized and sensitivity analysis will be performed to investigate the robustness of the cost model.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who were diagnosed with gastric cancer and completed either EOX or EOF chemotherapy treatment

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients less than 18 years of age
  • Patient who did not meet inclusion criteria

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Expected and Unexpected Provider Costs

    Time frame: At the completion of respective chemotherapy regimen, up to 6 months

    Expected and unexpected provider costs (chemotherapy, hospital stay, lab tests, clinic visits, AE management, other drug costs). The costs for healthcare resources usage, including hospital visits and laboratory investigations, were valued according to the Hong Kong Government Gazette 2003, which is the most updated version of official source for costs of public hospital services.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Expected and Unexpected Societal Costs

    Time frame: At the completion of respective chemotherapy regimen, up to 6 months

    Expected and unexpected societal costs (patient time, travel)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Vivian Wing Yan Lee

Other

Collaborators

  • Hoffmann-La Roche
  • Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital
  • Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong

Registry information

Official study title

Cost-minimization Analysis of Xeloda® vs 5-fluorouracil-based Treatment for Gastric Cancer Patients in Hong Kong

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Sep 5, 2012
Registry last updated
Mar 12, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.