Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00627900

Cost-Effectiveness Study in the Reduction of Coronary Restenosis With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents

Since the advent of coronary stents, in-stent restenosis has proven to be the major limitation of interventional cardiology, occurring in as many as 30% of patients. Drug-eluting stents are specifically designed to prevent the problem of in-stent restenosis. They consist of a selective anti-proliferative drug, sirolimus, a controlled-release polymer, and a closed-cell stent delivery platform. Upon placement, sirolimus elutes into the vessel wall and stops the process of neointimal hyperplasia, thereby significantly reducing the incidence of in-stent restenosis.

The study "Prevention of Coronary Restenosis" examines the effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) compared to bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with coronary stenosis. The goal of the study is to examine whether the guideline-supported implantation of SES, despite the higher initial cost, improves the quality and economic outcomes of the treatment of patients with coronary stenosis. Secondarily, the study evaluates patient quality of life, impairment of daily activities, re-intervention rate, as well as an account of the utilisation and benefits of the implemented standardised guidelines.

In this prospective, multi-centre, country-wide cohort study, 658 patients undergoing an implantation of a SES for treatment of coronary stenosis were recruited from 35 hospital centres. Their treatment and outcomes will be evaluated over a 3-year period by means of standardised questionnaires. In addition, information obtained from the patients will be confirmed and augmented by telephone interviews with the attending physicians involved in their follow-up care.

In order to appraise the effect of the new therapy, a comparison cohort group of 394 patients receiving a BMS was recruited. These patients will be evaluated and observed by the same method as those patients receiving a drug-eluting stent, also over 3 years

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Institut für Sozialmedizin, Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsökonomie

Berlin, 10098, Germany

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • indication for implantation of a coronary stent
  • de novo lesions < or = 30 mm in patients with diabetes
  • de novo lesions 12-30 mm or RVD 2.5-3.00 mm in patients without diabetes

Exclusion criteria

  • acute MI
  • lesion length >30 mm
  • in-stent restenosis
  • distal lesion in RVD < 2.25 mm
  • lesion in left main or bypass vessel
  • contraindication to Clopidogrel

Treatment and study plan

Bare Metal Stent

Device

implantation of a bare metal stent

Cypher-Stent (Implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent)

Device

Implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent

Other names: Cypher-Stent

Primary outcomes

  1. Cost equivalence of sirolimus-eluting coronary stents versus bare metal stents

    Time frame: 3,6,12,18,24, 36 months following stent implantation

Secondary outcomes

  1. MACE (re-PCI, myocardial infarction, CABG, death)

    Time frame: 3,6,12,24,36 months after stent implantation

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Other

Collaborators

  • Techniker Krankenkasse

Registry information

Official study title

Model Project for the Reduction of Coronary Restenosis

Acronym: GERSHWIN

Important dates

Study start
2003
Primary completion
2008
First posted
Mar 4, 2008
Registry last updated
Mar 4, 2008

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.