Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
Seville, Sevilla, 41013, Spain
NCT Number: NCT07530159
This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of retromuscular midline ventral hernia repair using open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Patients undergoing elective repair are included and followed to assess postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, recurrence and quality of life. In addition, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. The study is currently ongoing.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seville, Sevilla, 41013, Spain
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Retromuscular ventral hernia repair involves dissection of the retromuscular space, closure of the hernia defect and placement of a mesh in the retromuscular position. The procedure may be performed using an open, laparoscopic or robotic approach according to surgical practice. Differences between approaches relate to access, visualization and instrumentation, while maintaining the same anatomical plane of repair.
Retromuscular transabdominal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh of 30x30 cm
Standard perioperative care including anesthesia, antibiotic prophylaxis, thromboprophylaxis, postoperative analgesia and routine postoperative management according to institutional protocols.
Time frame: From date of surgery until hospital discharge (typically within 30 days postoperative)
Time frame: Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II) within 30 days
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) at 6 and 12 months
Health-related quality of life measured using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. The EQ-5D-5L index ranges from values below 0 (worse than death) to 1 (full health), with higher scores indicating netter quality of life.
Time frame: Cost-effectiveness (ICER) at 12 months
Time frame: Postoperative pain (VAS) at 24 hours postoperatively and at hospital discharge (within 30 days after surgery)
Postoperative pain measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), with higher scores including grater pain intensity
Fátima Hinojosa Ramírez
Other
Cost-Effectiveness of Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repair: Open, Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches
Acronym: ECOHERNIA-3
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07384962
Hernia, Hernia, Abdominal
View Trial DetailsNCT07642219
Ventral Hernia Repair
Giza, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07639281
Opioid Consumption, Postoperative, Ventral Hernia Repair
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07549113
Incisional Hernia Repair, Ventral Hernia Repair
Krasnodar, Krasnodarskiy Kray, Russia
View Trial Details