Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01653782

Cost Effectiveness of Medical Yoga Therapy on Low Back Pain

This randomized controlled study will evaluate the cost effectiveness of a yoga intervention compared to two evidence based programs; giving advice to stay active and guided exercise sessions. The first active program includes a six week standardized strength training program where the participants are personally instructed by a trained physiotherapist. The second active program is a six week standardized kundalini yoga program with group sessions twice a week lead by an experienced yoga instructor. Both programs consist of two exercise sessions per week and lasts for six weeks. After six weeks the participants are instructed to continue practicing their program twice a week on their own. The hypothesis are that a kundalini yoga program as an early intervention for Low Back Pain (LBP) is more cost effective than the two other interventions studied.

Participants were recruited through the occupational health services and by advertisement in the local press. Study subjects eligible for inclusion were informed of the study either by health care personnel at the occupational health care centers or by a research assistant at the Karolinska Institutet. Subjects were informed that if they were eligible to participate in the study they would be given the opportunity to participate in one of three approaches for treatment of neck and back pain.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Friskis och svettis, Stockholm, Sweden

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The study was a randomized control trial with a 12-month follow-up that compared active early intervention using medical yoga with exercise therapy and self-care advice. The medical yoga intervention was a standardized program based on Kundalini yoga. The group was led by an experienced yoga instructor. The exercise therapy was a standardized strength training program led by a trained physiotherapist. Both medical yoga and exercise interventions were held in groups and included two sessions per week over six weeks. After the sixth week, participants were instructed to continue practicing at least twice a week on their own. In the medical yoga group, the participants received written information and a disk providing additional guidance. In the exercise therapy group, the participants received tailored written information on exercise. The third group, evidence-based self-care advice, was physically examined by experienced back pain experts (an orthopedic specialist and a licensed chiropractor), and received an oral recommendation to stay active and a booklet containing evidenced-based self-care advice.

The participants were randomized to one of these three treatment groups after undergoing the initial examination and receiving the evidence-based information on self-care and staying active. The form of randomization was block randomization using the pre-randomization technique, in which for each participant an opaque envelope was picked, in consecutive order, by an external research assistant who had no contact with the participants. After randomization the back pain specialist met with the participants and gave them background information about the intervention they were being offered. Previous studies [19, 20] have shown that expectations of treatment and response levels differ depending on, whether the treatment is physically or psychologically oriented. Therefore, the two training interventions (yoga and exercise therapies) were both presented as well established training therapies, to improve the level of participation and to equalize the participants' expectations of the treatment and its outcomes. After the assignment of study participants to intervention groups, the statistician who performed the analyses on the intervention outcomes was "blinded". This implies that the statistician while assessing the outcomes of the interventions was not aware of the assigned intervention of participants and therefore, was not influenced in any way by the knowledge of which group was the intervention or the control.

Ethical consideration All three groups received treatments based on ethical grounds. The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee (2010/108-31/3) and registered in the clinicaltrials.gov protocol registration system (NCT01653782).

Data collection Participants were recruited through the Occupational Health Services (OHS) and by advertisement in the local media in Sweden's Stockholm County. People of working age with neck/back pain were invited to apply for participation in the study. Then, a screening questionnaire was mailed to those who responded to the invitation to participate in the study. Those who scored 90 points or more, i.e., fulfilling the requirements for a yellow flag, on the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (OMPSQ) [25] were invited for further physical examination.

The inclusion criteria were having non-specific low back pain, being with the age range of 18-60, having scored 90 points or more on the OMPSQ screening questionnaire and having a sufficient command of Swedish. The exclusion criteria were pregnancy, comorbidities that could affect the ability to perform exercise, ongoing regular weekly yoga practice or strength training and ongoing sickness absences of eight weeks or more.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • non- specific low back pain,
  • 18-60 years old,
  • > 90 points on the OMPSQ screening questionnaire for yellow flags and sufficient understanding of the Swedish language

Exclusion criteria

  • presence of so called Red flags,
  • pregnancy,
  • comorbidities affecting the ability to perform the interventions,
  • presently on sick leave for > 8 weeks,
  • ongoing regular weekly yoga practice or strength training.

Treatment and study plan

Kundalini yoga

Behavioral

Guided training twice a week for six weeks. Self instructing cd for home practice

Self care advice

Behavioral

Evidence based advice from caregiver about keeping active, exercise and a written self care pamphlet "The Back book"

Exercise

Behavioral

Strength training at a gym supervised by a physical therapist twice a week during 6 weeks. Self training instruction was provided. A written self care pamphlet "The Back book"

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Days on Sick Leave

    Time frame: 12 MONTHS

    Sick leave using self-reported data on number of days on sick leave

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cost Effectiveness

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months

    Assessments of direct and indirect cost. Further, assessments of performance is used to calculate production losses.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Karolinska Institutet

Other

Collaborators

  • Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research

Registry information

Official study title

Cost Effectiveness of Early Interventions for Non-specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study Investigating Medical Yoga, Exercise Therapy and Evidence Based Advice

Acronym: MYTH

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Jul 31, 2012
Registry last updated
Mar 14, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.