Juan F. Masa
Cáceres, 10005, Spain
NCT Number: NCT01752556
Primary objectives:
The efficacy of the therapeutic decision taken by respiratory polygraphy (RP) against polysomnography (PSG) using the Epworth scale;
Secondary Objective:
1. the cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and therapeutic decision valued using the Epworth Scale and EuroQol 5D. 2. effectiveness of the therapeutic decision by means of: 1) quality of life tests, 2) adherence and compliance to treatment, 3) blood pressure MAP, 4) biochemistry determinations. Design: prospective, randomized, controlled, open, parallel of non-inferiority. 440 patients will be randomized to diagnose and follow treatment based on the RP or the PSG. The follow-up will last 6 months with 4 assessments. Statistical analysis: We will compare the change in the Epworth scale between both arms of treatment through analysis of covariance. The premise of non-inferiority is -2 at the lower limit of 95% IC. Secondary variables will be analyzed using differences in independent means (or non-parametric equivalent) or Chi2 for dichotomous variables. Cost-effectiveness: costs generated by one and another method will be evaluated against the effectiveness of the primary variable using Bayesian techniques
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Cáceres, 10005, Spain
Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled, open, parallel noninferiority. 440 patients will be randomized to diagnose and follow treatment based on the PR or PSG generating four groups: two treated and two untreated with CPAP. The latter did not undergo self-certification home. The monitoring will be 6 months and 4 assessments. Statistical analysis: compare the change of the scale Epworth before and after the intervention between both treatment arms using analysis of covariance. The premise is non-inferiority of -1.6 at the lower limit of 95%. Secondary variables were analyzed by independent means differences (or nonparametric equivalent) or Chi2 for dichotomous variables. Cost-effectiveness: the costs generated by the two methods will be measured against the effectiveness of the primary endpoint using Bayesian techniques
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A conventional polysomnography will be done to perform the diagnosis and therapeutic decision(CPAP or not). Treated and untreated will be followed 6 moths
Time frame: Six months
Time frame: Six months
Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica
Other
Non-inferiority Randomized Control Trial About Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Home Respiratory Polygraphy Management in Sleep Apneas/Hypopneas Syndrome
Acronym: HRP-M
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02893865
Apnea, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Montpellier, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02906839
Apnea, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02657304
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Saint-Etienne, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02916160
Apnea, Chronic Heart Failure
Bordeaux, Pessac, France
View Trial Details