Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01752556

Cost-effectiveness of Home Respiratory Polygraphy

Primary objectives:

The efficacy of the therapeutic decision taken by respiratory polygraphy (RP) against polysomnography (PSG) using the Epworth scale;

Secondary Objective:

1. the cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and therapeutic decision valued using the Epworth Scale and EuroQol 5D. 2. effectiveness of the therapeutic decision by means of: 1) quality of life tests, 2) adherence and compliance to treatment, 3) blood pressure MAP, 4) biochemistry determinations. Design: prospective, randomized, controlled, open, parallel of non-inferiority. 440 patients will be randomized to diagnose and follow treatment based on the RP or the PSG. The follow-up will last 6 months with 4 assessments. Statistical analysis: We will compare the change in the Epworth scale between both arms of treatment through analysis of covariance. The premise of non-inferiority is -2 at the lower limit of 95% IC. Secondary variables will be analyzed using differences in independent means (or non-parametric equivalent) or Chi2 for dichotomous variables. Cost-effectiveness: costs generated by one and another method will be evaluated against the effectiveness of the primary variable using Bayesian techniques

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Juan F. Masa

Cáceres, 10005, Spain

About this study

Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled, open, parallel noninferiority. 440 patients will be randomized to diagnose and follow treatment based on the PR or PSG generating four groups: two treated and two untreated with CPAP. The latter did not undergo self-certification home. The monitoring will be 6 months and 4 assessments. Statistical analysis: compare the change of the scale Epworth before and after the intervention between both treatment arms using analysis of covariance. The premise is non-inferiority of -1.6 at the lower limit of 95%. Secondary variables were analyzed by independent means differences (or nonparametric equivalent) or Chi2 for dichotomous variables. Cost-effectiveness: the costs generated by the two methods will be measured against the effectiveness of the primary endpoint using Bayesian techniques

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Snoring or sleep apneas observed by partner
  • Symptoms that may be secondary to the apneas/hypopneas - concretely, an ESS ≥10
  • Age between 18 and 70
  • Absence of clinical suspicion of any other sleep pathology which could cause daytime sleepiness

Exclusion criteria

  • Psycho-physical inability to complete questionnaires
  • documented structural or coronary cardiopathy not controlled by medical treatment
  • Cheyennes-Stokes Syndrome
  • Patient has undergone an uvulopalatopharyngoplasty
  • Unable to provide informed consent

Treatment and study plan

diagnosis and therapeutic decision

Procedure

A conventional polysomnography will be done to perform the diagnosis and therapeutic decision(CPAP or not). Treated and untreated will be followed 6 moths

Primary outcomes

  1. Determine the efficacy of diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making evaluated using Epworth sleepiness scale as primary variable in patients managed by home RP and by PSG after six months of follow-up.

    Time frame: Six months

Secondary outcomes

  1. the cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and therapeutic decision valued using the Epworth Scale and EuroQol 5D.

    Time frame: Six months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Non-inferiority Randomized Control Trial About Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Home Respiratory Polygraphy Management in Sleep Apneas/Hypopneas Syndrome

Acronym: HRP-M

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2016
First posted
Dec 19, 2012
Registry last updated
Feb 8, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.