Hanoi Medical University
Hanoi, 10000, Vietnam
NCT Number: NCT03504878
In the world, there are several studies comparing the cost-effectiveness between laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy. But in Vietnam, health economics studies for acute appendicitis surgery in general and laparoscopic appendectomy in particular has hardly been available, and in the context of reform of the financial mechanism for payment, questions about the cost-effectiveness between the two surgical methods are particularly concerned. Therefore, we conducted a study "Cost-effectiveness analysis and case-based payment norm modeling in patients with appendectomy at Hanoi Medical University Hospital"
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Hanoi, 10000, Vietnam
Acute Appendicitis (AA) is a surgical emergency most common stomach. Appendicitis occurs at all ages. Recently, the rate tends to increase VRTC with age. In the United States, there are about 300,000 cases of appendectomy surgery per year. In Vietnam, according to statistics from a number of other authors showed that the rate of appendectomy surgery accounted for 40.5% - 49.8% of total number of cases of abdominal emergency. Open appendectomy (OA) has long been applied as the gold standard surgical procedure for the treatment of AA for over a century, since it was introduce by McBurrney in 1894 and still be common choice for procedure in many center. In 1981, due to the growth of endoscopic surgery, Semm first introduced the laparoscopic appendectomy, which render a minimal invasive procedure for abdomen and skin, nevertheless, its superiority over open appendectomy (OA) is still being debated. Some more recent paper demonstrate that Laparoscopic Appendectomy is the technique of choice in treatment of AA because of its clinical advantage and cost-effectiveness, however, more than 20 years later, the benefits of LA still remain a controversy for many researchers.
There are several studies comparing the cost-effectiveness between laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy in the world. But in Vietnam, health economics studies for appendix removal surgery in general and laparoscopic appendectomy in particular has hardly been available, and in the context of reform of the financial mechanism for payment, questions about the cost-effectiveness between the two surgical methods are particularly concerned. Therefore, we conducted a study "Cost-effectiveness analysis and case-based payment norm modeling in patients with appendectomy at Hanoi Medical University Hospital" with two main purposes
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The laparoscopic appendectomy was performed with three trocars. Pneumoperitoneum was created using an open Hasson technique. The mesoappendix was divided using a harmonic scalpel or endoscopic tissue fusion device. The appendix was divided by placing one endoscopic loop and cut with harmonic scalpel. The specimen was removed through the umbilical port.
The open appendectomy was carried out in the standard way with McBurney muscle splitting incision.
Time frame: 2 years
Total mean expense that patient pay for hospital after completing acute appendicitis treatment
Time frame: 2 years
Total mean cost of drugs used during operation for removal of appendix
Time frame: From the beginning of hospital admission till discharge from hospital ((an expected average of 10 days, maximum 20 days)
Total amount of money that acute appendicitis patient have to spend during the time of hospitalization
Time frame: 2 years
The expenses that patient pay for surgical removal of appendix accounted by case-based standardisation
Time frame: 2 years
The expenses that patient pay for acute appendicitis treatment accounted in accordance with services fee of hospital
Time frame: from the beginning of the surgery till discharge from hospital (an expected average of 8 days, maximum 20 days)
No. of days from surgery to discharge of hospital
Time frame: from the beginning of the surgery till discharge from hospital (an expected average of 8 days, maximum 20 days)
No. of days that patient experience pain after surgery
Time frame: from the beginning of the surgery till discharge from hospital (an expected average of 8 days, maximum 20 days)
Percentage of patients according to stratification of post-operative pain
Time frame: from the beginning of the surgery to the resumption (an expected average 2 days after the surgery
No. of days from surgery to the resumption of clear liquid and regular diet
Time frame: 2 years
Percentage of patients with good outcome at hospital discharge
Hanoi Medical University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07643142
Abdominal Pain, Acute Appendicitis
Istanbul, ATASEHIR, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05651360
Abdominal Pain, Acute Appendicitis
Odense, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT06808737
Acute Appendicitis, Agnosia
Ankara, Yenimahalle, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05085353
Acute Appendicitis, Acute Cholecystitis
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial Details