Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00678639

Cost Comparison of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Use in Emergency Department (ED) Patients With Chest Pain

The purpose of this study is to investigate the best way to evaluate patients with chest pain in the emergency department. It compares receiving treatment in an observation unit with admission to the hospital. Patients treated in the observation unit will undergo cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) testing. Patients treated with hospital admission will undergo the testing their doctor determines is best for them. All patients will undergo follow up to find out if they have had any heart related events.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center - Emergency Department

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States

About this study

Almost half of patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with possible cardiac chest pain are at intermediate risk for short term death or infarction. Most are admitted to the hospital for serial ECG's, cardiac biomarkers, cardiology consultation, and stress testing or coronary angiogram. However, the 2007 ACC/AHA guidelines suggest that these patients can be managed in an observation unit (OU). Recently, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has proven more accurate than traditional testing modalities for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and has also received endorsement from the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines. Immediate application of CMR in an OU may improve health care utilization compared to standard hospital admission for intermediate risk patients.

Research hypotheses:

  • Patients in an OU CMR protocol will have lower cost for the index hospitalization than standard care.
  • An OU CMR protocol for patients with intermediate risk chest pain will significantly improve the frequency of correct cardiovascular admission decisions when compared to standard care.

Methods summary:

110 ED patients at intermediate risk for short-term death or infarction, with nondiagnostic Electrocardiograms (ECG) and normal initial cardiac biomarkers, will be randomized to standard care or OU CMR protocols. Subjects in the OU CMR protocol will undergo CMR perfusion and stress testing, followed by serial biomarkers. Standard care subjects will be admitted for usual cardiac testing. ACS (infarction, death, coronary revascularization, unstable angina) will be assessed by evaluation of hospital course and phone follow-up at 30 days. Cost of hospital care will be compared among groups.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age greater than or equal to 18 years of age at the time of enrollment
  • Chest discomfort or other symptoms consistent with possible Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) as indicated by the treating physician after obtaining an Electrocardiogram (ECG) and cardiac biomarkers for the patient's evaluation
  • Patient requires an inpatient evaluation for their chest pain
  • The treating physician feels the patient could be discharged home if cardiac disease was excluded
  • Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score ≥ 2 OR physician clinical impression of intermediate or high likelihood that the symptoms represent ACS
  • Negative pregnancy test (if sexually active, female, and of childbearing age)

Exclusion criteria

  • Initial troponin I > 1.0 ng/ml
  • New ST-segment elevation on any electrocardiogram (≥ 1 mV)
  • New ST-segment depression on any electrocardiogram (≥ 2 mV)
  • Unable to lie flat
  • Hypotension (systolic < 90 mm Hg)
  • Contra-indications to MRI(Pacemaker, defibrillator, cerebral aneurysm clips, metallic ocular foreign body, implanted devices, claustrophobia)
  • Patient refusal of medical record review and telephone follow-up at 30 days
  • Terminal diagnosis with life expectancy less than 3 months
  • Pregnancy per patient report or positive pregnancy test (Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) exclusion criteria)
  • Renal insufficiency(done prior to enrollment)or end stage renal disease
  • Chronic liver disease (ex. hepatitis, cirrhosis)
  • History of liver, heart, or kidney transplant

Treatment and study plan

Observation unit care, coupled with cardiac MRI

Other

After Emergency Department (ED) evaluation, patients are randomized to Observation unit care or standard inpatient care. Patients in the observation unit will also undergo a stress cardiac MRI. Patients in the usual care arm may undergo any desired testing, including cardiac MRI, as determined by their treating physician.

Primary outcomes

  1. Cost of Index Hospitalization

    Time frame: Emergency Department (ED) arrival through hospital discharge, median length of stay was 28.1 hours

    Index hospitalization refers to the hospital visit during which the participant was enrolled in the trial. The primary outcome is examining the cost for this visit.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correct Admission Decision, Based Upon the Reference Standard of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) at 30 Days

    Time frame: 30 Days

    Participants with ACS and admitted or not experiencing ACS and discharged will be considered a correct admission decision. Remaining participants will be considered to have incorrect admission decisions.

  2. The Number of Participants Randomized to the OU and Were Able to Complete CMR Imaging

    Time frame: Emergency Department (ED) arrival through hospital discharge

    The number of participants able to complete the planned imaging sequences will be measured.

  3. Number of Participants Who Utilized the Indicated Health Care Procedures

    Time frame: 30d, 3mo, 6mo, and 1 year

    Measured as self report, assessed during telephone follow-up.

  4. Adverse Events During Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scanning

    Time frame: Occuring in the MRI scanning suite or within 30 minutes of the last image acquisition.

    Any event leading to early termination of the MRI acquisition, or requiring intervention by a physician, will be considered an adverse event related to MRI, excluding physician termination of image acquisition due to concerns of cardiac ischemia.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Cost Comparison of Cardiac MRI Use in ED Patients With Chest Pain

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
May 15, 2008
Registry last updated
Sep 11, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.