Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01228149

COSOPT-S® Treatment Versus Acetazolamide Before Trabeculectomy

The most common cause of post-trabeculectomy filtration failure is postoperative scarring. Long-term preoperative treatment with local antiglaucoma agents containing preservatives has an increased risk of post-operative scarring of the filtration bleb. Therefore many surgeons prepare their patients for planned trabeculectomy by discontinuing local antiglaucoma drugs, controlling IOP with oral acetazolamide, and treating the eye with local steroids.

Preservative-free COSOPT-S® eye drops b.i.d now provide a possibility to reduce IOP preoperatively with the aim of avoiding postoperative excessive scarring and the known adverse effects of oral acetazolamide while achieving comparable IOP reduction and long-term outcomes.

This study will investigate comparability (non-inferiority) of medical benefits of two different IOP lowering pharmaceutical interventions prior to trabeculectomy comparing COSOPT-S® bid to oral acetazolamide plus dexamethasone.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Clinical Trial Site, Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

Mainz, 55131, Germany

About this study

The most common cause of post-trabeculectomy filtration failure is postoperative scarring. Long-term preoperative treatment with local antiglaucoma agents containing preservatives has an increased risk of post-operative scarring of the filtration bleb. Therefore many surgeons prepare their patients for planned trabeculectomy by discontinuing local antiglaucoma drugs, controlling IOP with oral acetazolamide, and treating the eye with local steroids.

Preservative-free COSOPT-S® eye drops b.i.d now provide a possibility to reduce IOP preoperatively with the aim of avoiding postoperative excessive scarring and the known adverse effects of oral acetazolamide while achieving comparable IOP reduction and long-term outcomes.

This study will investigate comparability (non-inferiority) of medical benefits of two different IOP lowering pharmaceutical interventions prior to trabeculectomy comparing COSOPT-S® bid to oral acetazolamide plus dexamethasone.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female patients aged 18 years or older
  • Caucasian
  • A clinical diagnosis of open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation or pigment dispersion glaucoma, or ocular hypertension in one or both eyes
  • Planned trabeculectomy
  • Previous treatment with antiglaucoma agents containing preservatives for at least one month
  • Best corrected visual acuity of 20/800 or better in the study eye

Exclusion criteria

  • Secondary glaucoma except pseudoexfoliation glaucoma and pigmentary glaucoma
  • Current ocular infection, i.e. conjunctivitis or keratitis
  • Any abnormality preventing reliable applanation tonometry
  • Intraocular surgery or laser treatment within the past three months
  • History of surgery involving the conjunctiva
  • History of cataract surgery with sclerocorneal approach
  • Subject is allergic to sulfonamides
  • Reactive airway disease, including bronchial asthma or a history of bronchial asthma, or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Sinus bradycardia, second or third degree atrioventricular block, overt cardiac failure, cardiogenic shock
  • Severe renal dysfunction (CrCl < 30 ml/min) or hyperchloraemic acidosis
  • Depressed blood levels of sodium and / or potassium
  • Marked kidney and liver disease or dysfunction, gout, suprarenal gland failure, hypercalciuria or nephrocalcinosis
  • History of hypersensitivity to the investigational medicinal products or to any drug

Treatment and study plan

Trabeculectomy with preoperative Diamox/DexaEDO treatment

Drug

Filtrating glaucoma surgery, preoperative treatment with Diamox (acetazolamide) 28 day prior surgery. DexaEDO (dexamethasone) 7 days prior surgery

Other names: Filtrating glaucoma surgery

Trabeculectomy with preoperative Cosopt S treatment

Drug

Filtrating glaucoma surgery, preoperative treatment with Cosopt S (dorzolamide/timolol) 28 day prior surgery.

Other names: Filtrating glaucoma surgery

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) (ΔIOP) Three Months After Trabeculectomy in Comparison to the Mean Preoperative IOP

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Change in IOP (ΔIOP) three months after trabeculectomy in comparison to the mean preoperative IOP at one day prior surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Needling

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    number of patients requirering needling

  2. Number of Necessary 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) Injections

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Number of post-operative necessary 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) injections at week 12

  3. Ocular Hypotension Rate

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Ocular hypotension rate (0-5 mmHg of the study eye) indicated by the number of patients with ocular hypertension

  4. Change in IOP Between Visit 1 and 2

    Time frame: 28 days

    Change in IOP between Visit 1 (Screening visit 16 to 28 day prior trabeculectomy) and Visit 2 (1 day before trabeculectomy). Outcome shows mean of differences and 95% confidence intervall.

  5. Filtration Bleb Classification

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Filtration bleb classification (Grehn) in both Groups 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 week after surgery.

    For classification the following criteria were evaluated and scored as described below:

    • vascularisation (0=None, 1=mild, 2=a few corkscrew vessels)
    • identifiability (0=no borders to sides; 1=demarcation nasally or temporally; 2= demarcation to both sides; 3= encapsulated)
    • Thickness (0= a least 3mm; 1=2mm; 2= 1mm; 3=flat)
    • Microcysts (0=no; 1= yes)
    • Transparency (0= highly transparent; 2=moderate; 2=not transparent)
    • Mobility (0= yes; 1= no)
    • Leakage (0=yes, 1=no)

    For the change in the filtration bleb classification (only thickness at visit 5/week 12 mentioned below) descriptive statistics were presented only.

  6. Change in Quality of Life

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Change in quality of life measure by a certified National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire containing 25 questions (NEI VFQ-25).Patients tick a score at every question to present their visual functioning (usually from 1-5 or 1-6 in which 1 is best and 6 worse). Every single item/score is transformed to a scale between 0 and 100 (0 best, 100 worse). For the total score, the mean of all transformed scores/items is calculated.

    NEI VFQ 25 Quality of Life Questionnaire composite score at V5 (week 12 after surgery).

    Outcome shows mean of differences and 95% confidence intervall.

  7. Change in Conjunctival Redness

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Conjunctival redness (ORA Scale) evaluated from 16 up to 28 days (time window) prior surgery and 1 day prior surgery. The investigator compares patient's study eye with a set of reference photos showing various degrees of redness. Redness was scored on a scale of "none", "mild", "moderate", "severe" and "very severe". Absolute and relative frequencies of visit 1 and 2 were compared descriptively.

  8. Number of Suture Lyses

    Time frame: week 12

    Number of suture lyses at visit 5 (week 12 after surgery)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Katrin Lorenz

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Investigation of the Efficacy and Safety of Preoperative Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Reduction With Preservative-free COSOPT-S® (Dorzolamide/Timolol, MSD) Eye Drops Versus Oral Acetazolamide and Dexamethasone Eye Drops

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Oct 26, 2010
Registry last updated
Aug 1, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.