Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00681070

Cosmetic Outcomes of Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures in Pediatric Facial Lacerations

Our research hypothesis in this study is that there is no difference in long-term cosmetic outcomes between absorbable sutures and non-absorbable sutures in the repair of pediatric facial lacerations.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

1 year–18 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital, St Louis, Missouri, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The standard method of repair for facial lacerations is to close such wounds with non-absorbable sutures. Recently, topical skin adhesives such as n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate and 2-octyl cyanoacrylate have been used more frequently as these have been shown to be a faster and less painful way to close superficial facial lacerations. However, lacerations that are deeper, gaping or occurring along lines of excessive tension, such as the chin, still need sutures for repair. Non-absorbable sutures have to be taken out at 4-7 days. This involves another physician visit, parental absence from work, and children who need to be taken out of school or daycare for a simple suture removal.

In Part Iof the study, we were able to demonstrate non-inferiority of absorbable sutures to nylon sutures. However, we purposely removed all remaining absorbable sutures on the 5-7 day follow-up visit. In Part II, we will allow the absorbable sutures to dissolve on their own. We will again assess long term cosmetic outcomes, as well parental satisfaction, and short and long-term complication rates at 3 months.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clean. minimally contaminated facial lacerations, between 1-5 cms long, less than 8 hours old, not caused by animal bites, not needing plastic surgery repair

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy
  • Bleeding
  • Renal
  • Endocrine problems
  • Dirty wounds
  • Irregular wounds

Treatment and study plan

Arm 2: Absorbable sutures

Other

use of absorbable catgut sutures in pediatric facial lacerations

Other names: fast-absorbing catgut 5-0 by Johnson and Johnson

Arm 1: non-absorbable sutures

Other

Use of non-absorbing sutures

Primary outcomes

  1. cosmetic outcomes

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. infection

    Time frame: 4-6 days

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Temple University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Cosmetic Outcomes of Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures in Pediatric Facial Lacerations, Part 2

Acronym: Catgut

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
May 21, 2008
Registry last updated
Feb 10, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.