Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06401317

Corticosteroid Against Saline Injections for Thumb Osteoarthritis (CASITOA)

Thumb osteoarthritis or trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (TMO) is a common and painful form of hand arthritis that limits thumb mobility and hand function, affecting patients' quality of life. Although corticosteroids injections are a typical treatment, their effectiveness has been challenged, and side effects have been reported. Recent studies suggest that saline injections, usually considered inactive, might be a viable treatment option. The primary goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of saline injections versus corticosteroids injections in reducing TMO-related pain and improving hand function. In this study, 40 people with TMO will be randomly assigned to receive either a corticosteroids or a saline injection, without them or the doctors performing the injection knowing which one was administered (double blind). If saline injections prove more effective, they could provide a less harmful and cheaper therapeutic alternative for TMO patients.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal - Chirurgie plastique, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (TMO) is one of the most painful, disabling and prevalent hand osteoarthritis. One of the most common treatments for TMO is an intra-articular corticosteroids injection. However, non-superiority of corticosteroids injection over placebo to reduce pain has also been reported for TMO and other types of osteoarthritis (knee, hip, or shoulder). Furthermore, adverse effects of corticosteroids injection such as subcutaneous atrophy, tendon ruptures, and articular cartilage damage have been reported. Given the uncertain relevance of corticosteroids injection as a therapeutic agent, it becomes imperative to consider alternative options. In fact, three systematic reviews suggest that saline injections may be a viable option for TMO or knee pain.

To investigate the hypothesis that saline injection is a more effective modality than corticosteroids injection for the treatment of TMO in terms of reducing TMO pain and improving hand function, we must undertake a large, randomized trial in real clinical settings to ensure the acquisition of high-quality evidence. This pilot project is a preparatory phase for a larger study aimed at comparing the effectiveness of saline and corticosteroids injections in treating TMO, focusing on pain reduction and functional improvements. The study design is a pragmatic, double-blind randomized trial, adhering to PRECIS-2 guidelines.

The pilot randomized controlled trial will assess the feasibility of a study by evaluating aspects such as recruitment capabilities, treatment adherence, and the success of blinding techniques for participants and clinicians. It will also identify potential challenges and gather preliminary data to support a funding application for the full-scale study. Recruitment and data collection are planned over a 12-month period, targeting 40 participants initially to refine procedures and validate the study's feasibility. Participants will be randomly assigned to treatment, and the clinicians delivering the intervention will be blinded to the content of the injections. The study's primary outcome will measure pain intensity using a numeric scale at multiple time points, while secondary outcomes include upper limb functional limitations using the QuickDASH scale. These will be measured at baseline, before treatment, and at follow-up, 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • aged ≥18 years;
  • diagnosis of TMO was confirmed by X-ray interpreted by a radiologist;
  • suffering from pain at the base of the thumb;
  • the attending physician deems that an intra-articular corticosteroid injection would be beneficial, rather than opting for other types of intervention such as surgery
  • can read, understand and answer in either French or English.

Exclusion criteria

  • having received one or more corticosteroid injections in the last 12 months or surgery on the affected thumb;
  • suffering from painful thumb caused by a trauma (e.g., fracture, sprain), rheumatoid arthritis, or De Quervain's tendonitis; and
  • being pregnant or breastfeeding; and
  • known allergies to any components of the solutions (triamcinolone acetonide, benzyl alcohol, carboxymethylcellulose sodium, hydrochloric acid, polysorbate, sodium chloride, or sodium hydroxide) or to iodinated contrast media.

Treatment and study plan

Saline Solution (NaCl 0,9%)

Drug

Ultrasound/fluoroscopy-guided intra-articular injection of 0.25ml of 0.9% saline solution.

Other names: Saline solution

Triamcinolone Acetonide

Drug

Ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection 0.25ml (10 mg) of triamcinolone.

Other names: Corticosteroid

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of participant recruitment

    Time frame: Through study completion (estimated time, 1 year)

    The number of participants recruited per week, raw and divided by those screened for eligibility and those deemed eligible

  2. Rate of participants completing the follow-ups

    Time frame: Through study completion (estimated time, 1 year)

    The number of participants completing the follow-ups at 1, 3, and 6 months, divided by those recruited

  3. Success of blinded procedures for clinicians

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours after each injection

    Success of blinded procedures for physicians will be by asking them by email after the injection to guess which treatment they administered. Three response categories for treatment guess: 'corticosteroid injection', 'saline injection', or 'I don't know'.

  4. Success of blinded procedures for patients

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months after receiving the injection

    Success of blinded procedures for patients will be investigated by asking them to guess which treatment they will have received via the post-injection questionnaire. Three response categories for treatment guess are 'corticosteroid injection', 'saline injection', or 'I don't know', after the last follow-up).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Trapeziometacarpal pain intensity

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after injection

    Three types of pain intensity (current, on the average in the last 7 days, at its worst in the last 7 days) will be measured using a 0-10 rating scale (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain possible)

  2. QuickDASH questionnaire (short version of the 30-item Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand).

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after injection

    11-item questionnaire assesses the level of physical function and symptoms among patients with upper limb musculoskeletal condition. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 and the higher it is, the more disabled is the patient.

  3. Concomitant analgesic use

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after injection

    This will be captured using the Cumulative Analgesic Consumption Score (CACS), a tool that combines a qualitative assessment based on the World Health Organization analgesic ladder with a quantitative evaluation based on a score computed from the number of analgesics taken from each of three different categories: acetaminophen/NSAIDs, weak opioids, and strong opioids.

  4. Adverse events

    Time frame: 24 hours after the injection and at 1-month, 3-month- and 6-month post-injection.

    Side effects will be reported systematically by using a questionnaire with 5 items assessing the presence, type, frequency, severity and duration of injection-related adverse events.

Other outcomes

  1. Second injection

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months after injection

    The number of participants requesting a second injection with a different solution due to a perceived lack of efficacy, as well as the number of participants requesting a second injection with the same solution due to pain relapse will be compared between groups will be compared between groups (saline vs. cortisone)

  2. Arthroplasty

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months after injection

    The number of participants undergoing arthroplasty during the study period will also be compared between groups..

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Carlos Gevers-Montoro, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

819-979-0448

Tokiko Hamasaki, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

819-478-5011 ext. 2903

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

Other

Collaborators

  • Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal
  • Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
  • Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
  • McGill University
  • Université de Montréal

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of the Efficacy of Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injections Versus Saline Solution for Thumb Osteoarthritis: Double-Blind Pragmatic Randomized Pilot Study

Acronym: CASITOA

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
May 6, 2024
Registry last updated
Jan 22, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.