Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05818189

Cortical Correlates of Gait in Parkinson's Disease: Impact of Medication and Cueing

The purpose of the study is to determine the effects of a novel, personalized, tactile cueing system on gait automaticity. The researchers hypothesized that step-synchronized tactile cueing will reduce prefrontal cortex activity (improve automaticity) and improve gait variability (as well as gait speed). The researchers predict that improved automaticity with improved gait variability will be associated with increased activation of other than prefrontal cortical areas while walking (i.e., sensory-motor). To determine the effects of cueing, 60 participants with PD from will be randomized into one, of two, cueing interventions: 1) personalized, step-synchronized tactile cueing and 2) tactile cueing at fixed intervals as an active control group. In addition, the researchers will explore the feasibility and potential benefits of independent use of tactile cueing during a week in daily life for a future clinical trial.

This project will characterize the cortical correlates of gait automaticity, the changes in gait automaticity with cueing in people with Parkinson's Disease, and how these changes translate to improvement in gait and turning. The long-term goal is to unravel the mechanisms of impaired gait automaticity in Parkinson's Disease.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

45 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Cortical correlates of gait automaticity in Parkinson's disease: impact of cueing

A well-recognized hallmark of healthy walking is automaticity, defined as the ability of the nervous system to successfully coordinate movement with minimal use of attention-demanding, executive resources. It has been proposed that many walking abnormalities in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) are characterized by a shift in locomotor control from healthy automaticity to compensatory, executive control. This shift to less automaticity is potentially detrimental to walking performance as executive control strategies are not optimized for locomotor control, place excessive demands on a limited cognitive reserve, and continuously require attention. It has been hypothesized that as gait becomes more variable, as in people with Parkinson's Disease, control of gait is less automatic, i.e., requires more prefrontal cortex involvement. However, as gait variability is not a direct measure of automaticity, it is controversial whether it truly reflects impaired gait automaticity or impaired gait stability (i.e., dynamic balance). The recent development of wireless, functional, near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) of the brain provides more direct, physiological measures of automaticity, such as reduced prefrontal cortex activity. However, the contribution of other cortical areas to the concept of gait automaticity is largely unknown. Here, for the first time, the researchers will use a full cap fNIRS system to monitor cortical activity in multiple brain areas and wearable, inertial sensors to determine how cognitive abilities, levodopa, and cueing influence gait automaticity.

The effects of cognitive dysfunction and interventions on gait in people with Parkinson's Disease are complex. Impaired executive function has been associated with impaired gait and balance in PD, but it is not known if this relationship is due to the inability to compensate for poor basal ganglia control of gait automaticity with increased prefrontal cortex activity while walking. Sensory cueing may increase gait speed and reduce prefrontal activity but unlike levodopa, it may result in reduced gait variability due to enhanced automaticity. The researchers recently developed a novel type of personalized (triggered by the subject's own walking pattern), step-synchronized tactile stimulation on the wrists to improve the quality of gait and turning in people with Parkinson's Disease. The researchers will now compare the effects of cognitive dysfunction, dopaminergic medication, and tactile cueing on the quality of gait and turning and investigate whether improvements reflect changes in prefrontal activity.

This project will characterize the cortical correlates of gait automaticity, the changes in gait automaticity with cueing in people with PD, and how these changes translate to improvement in gait and turning. The long-term goal is to unravel the mechanisms of impaired gait automaticity in Parkinson's Disease.

The purpose of the study is to determine the effects of a novel, personalized, tactile cueing system on gait automaticity. The researchers hypothesized that step-synchronized tactile cueing will reduce prefrontal cortex activity (improve automaticity) and improve gait variability (as well as gait speed). We predict that improved automaticity with improved gait variability will be associated with increased activation of other than prefrontal cortical areas while walking (i.e., sensory-motor). To determine the effects of cueing, 60 participants with PD from will be randomized into one, of two, cueing interventions: 1) personalized, step-synchronized tactile cueing and 2) tactile cueing at fixed intervals as an active control group. A secondary analysis will explore whether the effect of cueing on gait automaticity is influenced by cognitive dysfunction. In addition, we will explore the feasibility and potential benefits of independent use of tactile cueing during a week in daily life for a future clinical trial. We will explore feasibility and efficacy of cueing in daily life comparing data of gait and turning from a week of continuous monitoring without and with using the tactile cueing. In addition, we will test whether any retention on gait and turning is present by adding a third week of continuous monitoring.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's Disease from movement disorders neurologist with the United Kingdom Brain Bank criteria of bradykinesia with 1 or more of the following - rest tremor, rigidity, and balance problems not from visual, vestibular, cerebellar or proprioceptive conditions
  • Without musculoskeletal or peripheral or central nervous system disorders (other than PD) that could significantly affect their balance and gait
  • All subjects will be capable of following directions for the protocols and to give informed consent.
  • Hoehn & Yahr Levels II-III.

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe dyskinesia that may affect quality of fNIRS.
  • Major musculoskeletal or neurological disorders, structural brain disease, epilepsy, acute illness or health history, other than Parkinson's Disease, significantly affecting gait and turning i.e., peripheral neuropathy with proprioceptive deficits (detected as lack of toe proprioception assessed during the neurological exam at Day 1), musculoskeletal disorders, vestibular problem, head injury, stroke.
  • Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) score < 21 or dementia that precludes consent to participate or ability to follow testing procedures
  • Inability to stand or walk for 2 minutes without an assistive device.
  • Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease exclusion criteria: Parkinson plus syndromes such as progressive supranuclear palsy, multiple system atrophy, or corticobasal syndrome or implanted electrodes for deep brain stimulation (DBS), possible vascular parkinsonism, current use of dopamine-blocking agents or cholinesterase inhibitor (as may affect Prefrontal cortical activity while walking).

Treatment and study plan

Personalized tactile cueing

Device

We will use as an external cue, a system of tactile cueing with the purpose of enhancing proprioceptive inputs, in the form of real-time(synchronized to the gait heel strike), closed-loop tactile feedback signaling left and right stance times while walking. Also, the participants use the same system cueing in closed-loop feedback during daily life for one week.

Other names: personalized

Fixed tactile cueing

Device

We will use as an external cue, a system of tactile cueing with the purpose of enhancing proprioceptive inputs, in the form of real-time, open-loop(fixed rhythm) tactile feedback signaling left and right stance times while walking. Also, the participants use the same system cueing in open-loop feedback during daily life for one week.

Other names: fixed

Primary outcomes

  1. Prefrontal cortex activity

    Time frame: day 1

    Oxygenated hemoglobin over the prefrontal cortex measures by fNIRS

  2. Parietal cortex activity

    Time frame: day 1

    Oxygenated hemoglobin over the parietal cortex measures by fNIRS

  3. Stride time variability

    Time frame: day 1

    Variability of stride time during 2 minute walking

  4. Local Dynamic Stability

    Time frame: day 1

    Stability during gait is assessed by phase dependent local dynamic stability (LDS) measures of the trunk acceleration while walking

  5. Turn duration

    Time frame: day 1

    Average duration of 360 turning while performing a 1 minute turning in place task

  6. Turn jerk

    Time frame: day 1

    Average turning smoothness while performing a 1 minute turning in place task

Secondary outcomes

  1. Supplementary motor area cortical activity

    Time frame: day 1

    Oxygenated hemoglobin over the SMA cortex measures by fNIRS

  2. Occipital cortical activity

    Time frame: day 1

    Oxygenated hemoglobin over the visual cortex measures by fNIRS

  3. Gait speed

    Time frame: day 1

    Average gait speed during 2 minute walking

  4. Gait speed variability

    Time frame: day 1

    Variability of gait speed during 2 minute walking

  5. Stride time

    Time frame: day 1

    Average stride duration during 2 minute walking

  6. Stride length

    Time frame: day 1

    Average stride length during 2 minute walking

  7. Stride length variability

    Time frame: day 1

    Variability of stride length during 2 minute walking

  8. Turn duration variability

    Time frame: day 1

    Variability of turning duration while performing a 1 minute turning in place task

  9. Turn jerk variability

    Time frame: day 1

    Variability of turning smoothness while performing a 1 minute turning in place task

  10. Number of steps during turning

    Time frame: day 1

    Average number of steps while performing a 1 minute turning in place task

  11. Number of steps during turning variability

    Time frame: day 1

    Variability of number of steps while performing a 1 minute turning in place task

  12. Turn velocity

    Time frame: day 1

    Average turning velocity while performing a 1 minute turning in place task

  13. Turn velocity variability

    Time frame: day 1

    Variability of turning velocity while performing a 1 minute turning in place task

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Francesa Alcalá, B.S.

CONTACT

[email protected]

503-913-3691

Graham Harker, MPH

CONTACT

[email protected]

503-418-2601

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Oregon Health and Science University

Other

Collaborators

  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Registry information

Acronym: cueing

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Apr 18, 2023
Registry last updated
Dec 17, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.