Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01080014

Correlation Between Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in Argentina

This observational study is being conducted to evaluate the usefulness of the MSFC and its relationship with EDSS scores in subjects with MS in Argentina.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

This observational, open-label study is being conducted to correlate change in EDSS score with the change in MSFC scores at the end of a 2-year follow-up period for subjects with MS in Argentina. Measurement of disability is an indispensable parameter in assessing the efficacy of experimental therapeutic agents in MS as well as in trying to determine possible individual evolution of the disease. Clinical scales are being used as primary or secondary outcome measures for recording disease progression in clinical trials. Kurtzke's EDSS is still used as a gold standard for measuring impairment and disability in MS. The MSFC is an examination-based quantitative scoring of neurological impairment. This study aims to establish a correlation between the usefulness of both scales.

OBJECTIVES

Primary Objective:

  • To evaluate the change in MSFC score with change in EDSS scores at end of 2 year follow-up period for subjects with MS in Argentina

Secondary Objectives:

  • To evaluate the cross-sectional correlations in MSFC score at baseline and at 24 months with EDSS score at baseline and at 24 months
  • To describe the MSFC score for MS phenotype in this population
  • To evaluate the predictive validity of MSFC score of a subsequent EDSS change in a subgroup of MS patients in Argentina

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects with definite diagnosis of MS, according to McDonald's criteria
  • All clinical types: relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), primary progressive MS (PPMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Stable disease course without any relapse for at least the previous 3 months
  • Subjects treated or not with disease modifying drugs
  • Ages between 18 and 65 years and is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements
  • Subject has a stable residence with no planned move during the entire investigation period

Exclusion criteria

  • Life expectancy less than 5 years at admission
  • Diagnosis of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS)
  • Other clinical conditions that mimic MS
  • Psychiatric diseases
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Pregnancy
  • The subject is unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol or scheduled appointments
  • Subject is unable to understand the language in which the approved informed consent is written
  • The subject is a study site employee, or an immediate family member (i.e., spouse, parent, child, sibling) of a study site employee, involved in conduct of this study

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. - Evaluation of correlations between changes over time

    Time frame: Baseline and two years

    • Evaluation of correlations between changes over time for MSFC composite score and arm, leg and cognitive MSFC scores versus EDSS score changes over the same periods

Secondary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the predictive validity of MSFC score of a subsequent EDSS change in a subgroup of MS patients

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) in the Follow-up of MS Patients: Correlation With the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Among Different Clinical Forms in Argentina

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Mar 3, 2010
Registry last updated
Oct 16, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.