Seoul National University Bundang hospital
Sungnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT00431717
The purpose of this study is to compare the difference of diagnostic efficiency between coronary CT angiography and myocardial perfusion single photon emission computerized tomography in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–75 year
All sexes
Observational
Sungnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in patients with diabetes. Patients with diabetes are known to have silent myocardial ischemia more frequently than those without diabetes. Furthermore, CAD in patients with diabetes frequently manifested in advance stage, and morbidity and mortality are higher than those without diabetes. Early screening and treatment of CAD in asymptomatic patients with diabetes might reduce high morbidity and mortality.
Myocardial perfusion single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) is known as a gold standard method in detecting silent myocardial ischemia in asymptomatic patients with diabetes. Despite of the power of detecting myocardial ischemia functionally, there are limitations of SPECT in diagnosing subclinical coronary atherosclerosis anatomically. In recent advance in technology, coronary CT angiography (CTA) could detect subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. However, there is a paucity of information comparing the diagnostic power between SPECT and CTA.
Therefore in our study, we compare the difference of diagnostic efficiency between coronary CT angiography and myocardial perfusion single photon emission computerized tomography in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
In this study, we will recruit asymptomatic patients with diabetes. At the time of enrollment, all patients will undergo two imaging studies (SPECT and CTA) within a few days apart. When patients had positive result in either study, they will undergo coronary angiography for confirmation. We will evaluate the results of two studies comparing with coronary angiography. When the patients are eligible for study, investigators will give information about the study and obtain written consent. The presence of chest pain symptom will be screened with Rose questionnaire. Medical history and physical examination will be performed, and baseline laboratory work-up will be performed. Investigators will evaluate the status of diabetic complication (retinopathy/nephropathy/cardiac autonomic neuropathy).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
1)dyslipidemia, 2)hypertension, 3)smoking, 4)family history of premature coronary artery disease
Exclusion criteria
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Other
Study Comparing Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and SPECT to Detect Subclinical Coronary Atherosclerosis in Asymptomatic Diabetes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00431977
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Sungnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT00358033
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05708547
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Dijon, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02316782
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
View Trial Details