Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT03041883

Corneal Collagen Crosslinking to Increase the Resistance of the Support Graft of the KPro Type I Against Corneal Melting

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the corneal collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet A in aim to increase the resistance of the graft used as a support for the Boston keratoprosthesis (KPro) type I against corneal melting (keratolysis or sterile necrosis).

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

Montreal, Quebec, H2X3E4, Canada

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Marie-Catherine Tessier

CONTACT

[email protected]

514 890-8000 ext. 11550

About this study

The Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro) is an artificial cornea that restores the clarity of the visual axis. It is indicated in patients for whom conventional corneal transplantation offers a very low probability of success. Several innovations have led to improved outcomes following implantation of a KPro. However, retention of the KPro varies between 83 and 100% in the most recent series. The extrusion of the KPro is usually caused by the melting of the corneal tissue (keratolysis or sterile necrosis) used as a support.

This corneal melting is mediated by enzymes from the class of the matrix metalloproteinases (MMP). Several different types of insults may lead to an excess of these enzymes. Chronic inflammation of the ocular surface is undoubtedly the best recognized risk factor. Indeed, autoimmune diseases such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome, Lyell syndrome (toxic epidermal necrolysis, TENS) and mucous membrane pemphigoid, has the highest rate of corneal melting post KPro. Moreover, the development of a retroprosthetic membrane has recently been recognized as a risk factor for melting. Furthermore, the dryness of the corneal epithelium, due to insufficient tear production or an alteration of the blink reflex of the eye, can also lead to an overexpression of MMP. Finally, infectious keratitis can lead to significant thinning of the corneal tissue, even once the infectious process is resolved.

Corneal collagen cross-linking is a technique approved by Health Canada for strengthening the biomechanical properties of the cornea. The crosslinked corneas become more resistant to collagenase and other MMP. The use of a crosslinked corneal graft as a support for the KPro is an interesting approach to the prevention of corneal melting.

A prospective, randomized, controlled and double-blind study will be conducted with patients receiving a Kpro at the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal. Forty patients will be randomized into two groups, half will receive KPro in a crosslinked graft-support, while the other half will receive a usual graft-support. Patients will be met by their surgeon to discuss the risks, benefits of the KPro type I and alternatives treatments. Patients accepting KPro surgery, will be informed of the nature and course of the study and will be offered to participate in the study. The Eye bank of Canada will manage the randomization and maintain the codes identifying the crosslinked corneas from the untreated corneas, keeping both the surgeon and the patient blinded. Randomization will be done through a free application (http://www.randomizer.org/form.htm). A series of 10 numbers will be generated. Even numbers indicate crosslinked corneas and odd numbers indicate non-crosslinked corneas. The order of the digits will increase as for each subject is enrolled in the study. The procedure for corneal collagen crosslinking will be performed at the Eye Bank of Canada in a similar procedure to the treatment for keratoconus. Under sterile conditions, the corneo-scleral button will be inspected to meet the standard of care. If the patient is randomized to the crosslinked group, then the cornea will be treated with crosslinking as described further. If the patient is randomized the control group, the cornea will not be treated with crosslink but will be deepithelialized and soaked with riboflavin drops as described further.

The surgeon will receive the graft and operate according to the standard procedure. The KPro surgery and postoperative care will be performed in the standard way and thus will be the same for both study groups. Postoperative follow will be held at 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months and will continue subsequently every 2-4 months depending on the judgment of the surgeon. These visits will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination. In particular, the presence of corneal melting, leakage of aqueous humor, corneal infection and extrusion will be noted. Meanwhile, an imaging allowing quantification of the thickness of the cornea graft-support (optical coherence tomography anterior segment) will be performed at least once during the first three months postoperative. This imaging will be repeated at 1, 2 and 5 years.

The prevalence of various complications (melting, leak, infection, extrusion) will be compared between the two groups with the Fischer exact test. Also, the time between surgery and the occurrence of complications will be compared using the Student t test. Finally, survival analysis of Kaplan-Meier will be performed for 1) the occurrence of corneal melting and 2) maintaining a visual acuity greater than 20/200.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Candidate for KPro type I
  • Capacity to give written consent
  • Ability to be followed for the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Participation in another interventional study
  • Failure to wear a therapeutic contact lens due to abnormalities of the eyelids.
  • Inability to give written consent

Contraindications to the KPro type I:

  • Severe dryness with keratinization of the ocular surface
  • Intraocular tumor
  • Terminal glaucoma
  • Inoperable retinal detachment
  • Phthisis bulbi

Treatment and study plan

Crosslinking with riboflavin of the corneal graft-support

Procedure

Corneal graft support for the KPro will be crosslinked and used with the standard surgical technique

De-epithelisation of the corneal graft support with instillation of riboflavin

Procedure

Corneal graft-support will be de-epithelialized and soaked with riboflavin and then used with the standard surgical technique

Primary outcomes

  1. Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button

    Time frame: 1 day

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  2. Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button

    Time frame: 1 week

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  3. Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  4. Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button

    Time frame: 1 month

    This visits will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  5. Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button

    Time frame: 1 month

    An imaging allowing quantification of the thickness of the cornea graft-support (optical coherence tomography anterior segment) will be performed.

  6. Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button

    Time frame: 3 months

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  7. Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button

    Time frame: Every 2-4 months depending on the judgment of the surgeon for at least 5 years

    These visits will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  8. Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button

    Time frame: 1 year

    An imaging allowing quantification of the thickness of the cornea graft-support (optical coherence tomography anterior segment) will be performed.

  9. Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button

    Time frame: 2 years

    An imaging allowing quantification of the thickness of the cornea graft-support (optical coherence tomography anterior segment) will be performed.

  10. Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button

    Time frame: 5 years

    An imaging allowing quantification of the thickness of the cornea graft-support (optical coherence tomography anterior segment) will be performed.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of the rates of infectious keratitis between the groups

    Time frame: 1 day

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  2. Comparison of the rates of infectious keratitis between the groups

    Time frame: 1 week

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  3. Comparison of the rates of infectious keratitis between the groups

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  4. Comparison of the rates of infectious keratitis between the groups

    Time frame: 1 month

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  5. Comparison of the rates of infectious keratitis between the groups

    Time frame: 3 months

    This visits will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  6. Comparison of the rates of infectious keratitis between the groups

    Time frame: Every to 2-4 months depending on the judgment of the surgeon for at least 5 years

    These visits will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  7. Comparison of the rates of extrusion of the KPro between the groups

    Time frame: 1 day

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  8. Comparison of the rates of extrusion of the KPro between the groups

    Time frame: 1 week

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  9. Comparison of the rates of extrusion of the KPro between the groups

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  10. Comparison of the rates of extrusion of the KPro between the groups

    Time frame: 1 month

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  11. Comparison of the rates of extrusion of the KPro between the groups

    Time frame: 3 months

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  12. Comparison of the rates of extrusion of the KPro between the groups

    Time frame: Every to 2-4 months depending on the judgment of the surgeon for at least 5 years

    These visits will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  13. Comparison of the visual acuity between the groups

    Time frame: 1 day

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  14. Comparison of the visual acuity between the groups

    Time frame: 1 week

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  15. Comparison of the visual acuity between the groups

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  16. Comparison of the visual acuity between the groups

    Time frame: 1 month

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  17. Comparison of the visual acuity between the groups

    Time frame: 3 months

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

  18. Comparison of the visual acuity between the groups

    Time frame: Every to 2-4 months depending on the judgment of the surgeon for at least 5 years

    This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Marie-Catherine Tessier

CONTACT

[email protected]

514-890-8000 ext. 11550

Soumaya Bouhout

CONTACT

[email protected]

514-264-0436

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Other

Collaborators

  • Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Corneal Collagen Crosslinking to Increase the Resistance of the Graft Used as a Support for the Boston Keratoprosthesis Type I Against Corneal Melting

Acronym: CXL-KPro

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Feb 3, 2017
Registry last updated
Apr 28, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.