NCT Number: NCT00184977
COPD on Primary Care Treatment (COOPT)
The aim of this family practice based study is to determine the long-term treatment effects of two drugs that are presumed to modify the course and progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), oral N-acetylcysteine and inhaled corticosteroids.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
30 year–75 year
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary location
Department of Family Medicine, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
About this study
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a disorder characterised by symptoms and abnormal tests of expiratory flow that do not change markedly over periods of several months observation. COPD includes chronic bronchitis and emphysema. It is not fully clear which medication is the most efficacious in the long-term treatment of COPD. In contrast to asthma, the efficacy and therefore the precise role of inhaled corticosteroids is less clear in the treatment of patients with COPD. The same applies to another (much less investigated) possibility in the treatment of COPD, the anti-oxidant agent N-acetylcysteine. N-acetylcysteine is used as a mucolytic agent in a variety of clinical conditions, such as acute and chronic bronchitis and cystic fibrosis. The aim of this study, which is performed in family practices, is to determine the 3-year treatment effects and cost-effectiveness of oral N-acetylcysteine versus an inhaled corticosteroid (fluticason propionate) in modifying the course and progression of COPD.
Comparisons: N-acetylcysteine (oral, 600 mg o.d.) and fluticason propionate (dry powder inhalation, 500 mcg b.i.d.) are compared with placebo
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- age between 30 and 75 years
- being a smoker or ex-smoker
- post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio is <88% of the predicted value in case of men or <89% of the predicted value in case of women
- post-bronchodilator FEV1>=40% and <90% of the predicted value
- subjects have a GP diagnosis of COPD or had increased cough, sputum and/or dyspnea on most days for 3 or more months a year, for at least the last 2 years
- able to provide a written informed consent
- expected to be able to comply with the study protocol
- able to communicate with the study personnel and to understand and read instructions
- females of childbearing potential should use an acceptable method for birth control
Exclusion criteria
- a known history of intolerance or allergy for N-acetylcysteine or fluticason
- use of long-term oxygen therapy or expected to be in need of oxygen therapy within the next 3 years
- registered asthma, allergic rhinitis, and/or allergic eczema as an active problem in the GPs records within the last 12 months
- alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency
- cystic fibrosis
- active infection due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis
- status post-lobectomy
- clinically proven gastric or duodenal ulcer in the previous six months
- non-compensated severe chronic congestive heart failure
- life expectancy reduction (e.g. malignancies)
- evidence of illicit drug use or abuse of alcohol intake
- expected not to be compliant in taking medications in general
- being pregnant or giving breastfeeding
- not complying with the inclusion criteria
Treatment and study plan
Fluticasone propionate
DrugPrimary outcomes
-
exacerbations of COPD, condition-specific quality of life
Secondary outcomes
-
lung function decline, respiratory symptoms
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
Other
Collaborators
- Dutch Health Care Insurance Board
- GlaxoSmithKline
- The Netherlands Asthma Foundation
- Zambon SpA
Registry information
Official study title
A Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Inhaled Fluticason Propionate Versus Oral N-acetylcysteine in the Treatment of Patients With COPD in General Practice
Important dates
- Study start
- 1998
- Study completion
- 2003
- First posted
- Sep 16, 2005
- Registry last updated
- Mar 12, 2010
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Is the Short Physical Performance Battery a Useful Outcome Measure in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
NCT01515709
Bronchial Diseases, Bronchitis
Harefield, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsPhysical Activity Augmentation Using Pedometers During Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
NCT01719822
Bronchial Diseases, Bronchitis
Middlesex, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsDo the SPPB and 4-metre Gait Speed Predict Hospital Readmission in Patients Hospitalised for Acute Exacerbation if COPD?
NCT01507415
Bronchial Diseases, Bronchitis
Uxbridge, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsComparison of Two Programs to Encourage Physical Activity in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
NCT00328484
Behavior, Bronchial Diseases
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details