Effectiveness of DITM Versus IMT in COPD Patients
NCT06958666
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Chronic Disease
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT07118306
The goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of implementing an AI-enabled clinical workflow tool (Viz COPD) on respiratory specialist follow up and clinical outcomes after an acute exacerbation.
Interested in participating?
Request Info40 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Illinois, United States
Time perspective: This study will collect data prospectively for the Experimental cohort and retrospectively for the Control cohort. There is also an Exploratory cohort which will collect retrospective and prospective data.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: From time of exacerbation to 30 days after discharge
Proportion of patients with a respiratory specialist follow-up visit within 30 days after discharge in the experimental cohort compared to the control cohort.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Time from discharge to respiratory specialist follow-up visit in the experimental cohort compared to the control cohort.
Time frame: Enrollment to 90 days after discharge
Proportion of patients with a respiratory specialist follow-up visit within 90 days after discharge in the experimental cohort compared to the control cohort.
Time frame: Enrollment to 30 days after discharge
Proportion of patients with all-cause readmission within 30 days after discharge in the experimental cohort compared to the control cohort.
Time frame: Enrollment to 90 days after discharge
Proportion of patients with all-cause readmission within 90 days after discharge in the experimental cohort compared to the control cohort.
Time frame: Enrollment to 30 days after discharge
Proportion of patients with an acute exacerbation (moderate, moderate and severe, severe) within 30 days after discharge in the experimental cohort compared to the control cohort
Time frame: Enrollment to 90 days post discharge
Proportion of patients with an acute exacerbation (moderate, moderate and severe, severe) within 90 days after discharge in the experimental cohort compared to the control cohort
Time frame: Enrollment to 1 year post discharge
Rate of acute exacerbations (moderate, moderate and severe, severe) at 1 year after discharge in the experimental cohort compared to the control cohort.
Time frame: Enrollment through 30 days after discharge
Proportion of patients with a composite outcome consisting of emergency department visits, readmissions, or exacerbations within 30 days after discharge in the experimental cohort compared to the control cohort
Time frame: Enrollment through 90 days after discharge
Proportion of patients with a composite outcome consisting of emergency department visits, readmissions, or exacerbations within 90 days after discharge inthe experimental cohort compared to the control cohort.
Time frame: Enrollment through 1 year after discharge
Rate of a composite outcome consisting of emergency department visits, readmissions, or exacerbations at 1 year after discharge in the experimental cohort compared to the control cohort.
Time frame: Enrollment through 30 days after discharge
Proportion of patients with a cardiovascular event within 30 days after discharge in the experimental cohort compared to the control cohort.
Time frame: Enrollment through 1 year after discharge
Rate of cardiovascular events at 1 year after discharge in the experimental cohort compared to the control cohort.
Time frame: Enrollment through 30 days after discharge
Proportion of patients with allcause mortality within 30 days after discharge in the experimental cohort compared to the control cohort
Time frame: Enrollment through 90 days after discharge
Proportion of patients with allcause mortality within 90 days after discharge in the experimental cohort compared to the control cohort.
Time frame: Enrollment through 1 year after discharge
Rate of all-cause mortality at 1 year after discharge in the experimental cohort compared to the control cohort.
Time frame: Enrollment through 90 days
The proportion of patients in the experimental cohort with pharmacological treatment consistent with the GOLD treatment recommendations at 30 and 90 days after discharge for the index exacerbation compared to the control cohort.
Viz.ai, Inc.
Industry
A Multicenter Study of the Impact of a COPD Identification and Referral System on Patient Follow Up and Outcomes After an Acute COPD Exacerbation Resulting in an Emergency Department Visit or Hospitalization
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06958666
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Chronic Disease
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07704567
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Chronic Disease
Denver, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06780046
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Chronic Disease
Aparecida de Goiânia, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT07602192
Asthma, Asthma (Diagnosis)
Seoul, Dongjak-gu, South Korea
View Trial Details