Copanlisib
DrugSolution for IV infusion
Other names: Aliqopa
NCT Number: NCT03474744
For marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) Rituximab in combination with conventional chemotherapy is widely used for those patients who fail local therapy or do not qualify for such. Depending on the MZL subtype Rituximab/chemotherapy is able to induce in part long remissions, but do not prevent relapse later on. In addition, chemotherapy associated toxicity is often problematic in MZL patients, who are mostly of advanced age. Thus, chemotherapy - free approaches are highly attractive for this patient group. Rituximab single agent is a widely used chemotherapy - free approach in MZL, but was significantly inferior compared to Rituximab/chlorambucil in a large randomized prospective clinical trial in treatment naïve MZL with a CR rate of 56 % vs. 80%, respectively (P<0.001). Thus, it is the major aim to develop chemotherapy - free approaches for MZL, which approach efficacy of Rituximab/chemotherapy combinations, but avoid chemotherapy associated toxicities. This in particular important in MZL as many physicians are reluctant to treat these often elderly patients with more intense treatments and prefer single agent therapies in these very often well and long responding lymphoma subtype. The PI3K inhibitor Copanlisib has shown high clinical activity in indolent B - cell lymphomas among them MZL. Based on these observations it is the aim of this study to test the toxicity and efficacy of Copanlisib in combination with the anti-CD20 antibody Rituximab in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed MZL in need of treatment, who are not eligible or failed local therapy, following the assumption that this novel chemotherapy - free combination is significantly more effective than Rituximab single agent therapy and at least as efficient as Rituximab/chemotherapy, but avoids chemotherapy - related toxicity.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Med. Uni Wien AKH, Klinische Abteilung für Onkologie, Innere Medizin I, Vienna, Austria
For marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) Rituximab in combination with conventional chemotherapy is widely used for those patients who fail local therapy or do not qualify for such. Depending on the MZL subtype Rituximab/chemotherapy is able to induce in part long remissions, but do not prevent relapse later on. In addition, chemotherapy associated toxicity is often problematic in MZL patients, who are mostly of advanced age. Thus, chemotherapy - free approaches are highly attractive for this patient group. Rituximab single agent is a widely used chemotherapy - free approach in MZL, but was significantly inferior compared to Rituximab/chlorambucil in a large randomized prospective clinical trial in treatment naïve MZL with a CR rate of 56 % vs. 80%, respectively (P<0.001). Thus, it is the major aim to develop chemotherapy - free approaches for MZL, which approach efficacy of Rituximab/chemotherapy combinations, but avoid chemotherapy associated toxicities. This in particular important in MZL as many physicians are reluctant to treat these often elderly patients with more intense treatments and prefer single agent therapies in these very often well and long responding lymphoma subtype. The PI3K inhibitor Copanlisib has shown high clinical activity in indolent B - cell lymphomas among them MZL. Based on these observations it is the aim of this study to test the toxicity and efficacy of Copanlisib in combination with the anti-CD20 antibody Rituximab in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed MZL in need of treatment, who are not eligible or failed local therapy, following the assumption that this novel chemotherapy - free combination is significantly more effective than Rituximab single agent therapy and at least as efficient as Rituximab/chemotherapy, but avoids chemotherapy - related toxicity.
The objective of the trial is to test the efficacy and toxicity of the treatment of Copanlisib/Rituximab in patients with MZL in need of treatment, who have failed or are not eligible for local therapy or relapsed after local or systemic therapy. For efficacy the rate of complete remissions (according to the GELA criteria for gastric MALT or to the Cheson 2007 criteria for non-gastric extranodal, nodal and splenic MZL) after induction therapy will be primarily analysed. For toxicity treatment associated adverse events, quality of life and cumulative incidence of secondary malignancies will be documented.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patients must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for participation in this study:
In patients with splenic MZL without splenic tissue available for histologic review, the diagnosis may be confirmed by the presence of splenomegaly and typical morphologic and immunophenotypic findings in the blood and bone marrow. Bone marrow (acceptable up to 12 weeks before start of treatment) must be submitted for retrospective central confirmation.
For nodal MZL and extragastric MALT lymphoma:
For SMZL:
For splenic MZL, an enlarged spleen on CT scan and lymphoma cell infiltration has to be seen in bone marrow and/or peripheral blood. Please refer also to Appendix E.
At least one of the following criteria must be met:
For gastric MALT lymphoma:
For gastric MALT lymphoma, the clinical evidence of the MZL as seen by gastroendoscopy is sufficient. There is no need to show a measurable lesion by CT scan or MRI. Please refer to Appendix D.
Inclusion is possible for patients with:
Others:
Exclusion criteria
The presence of any of the following will exclude a subject from enrolment:
Solution for IV infusion
Other names: Aliqopa
Solution for IV infusion
Other names: Truxima
Time frame: 12 months
Primary endpoint is the complete response (CR rate (CRR) determined 12 months after start of induction therapy). Patients who progress before 12 months after start of treatment will be treated as CR='NO' and will be included in the calculation of the primary endpoint. No primary endpoint will be determined for patients who withdraw.
Time frame: 12 months
The response rates (complete response (CR), partial response (PR)) and overall response rate (CR or PR) are evaluated 4 weeks after the end of induction treatment and 12 months after start of treatment.
Time frame: 8.5 years
Best response is determined in the time interval from the start of induction therapy to end of follow-up.
Time frame: 8.5 years
Time to best response is defined as the time from the start of induction to best response the patient achieves (CR, PR).
Time frame: 12 months
Time to first response is defined as the time from the start of induction to first response (CR, PR).
Time frame: 12 months
Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from registration to the first occurrence of progression or relapse as assessed by the investigator, or death from any cause. PFS for patients without disease progression, relapse, or death will be censored at the time of the last tumor assessment.
Time frame: 8.5 years
Time to treatment failure (TTF) is defined as the time of registration to discontinuation of therapy for any reason including death from any cause, progression, toxicity or add-on of new anti-cancer therapy. Patients alive without treatment failure are censored at the latest tumor assessment date.
Time frame: 8.5 years
Duration of response as defined as the period from the first response (at least PR) to treatment until evidence of disease progression, relapse or death of any cause. Patients alive without progression and relapse will be censored at the latest tumor assessment date or the stopping date.
Time frame: 8.5 years
Cause specific survival is defined as the period from the induction registration to death from lymphoma or lymphoma related cause; death unrelated to MZL is considered as a competing event.
Time frame: 8.5 years
Overall survival is defined as the period from the induction registration to death from any cause. Patients who have not died until the time of the analysis will be censored at their last contact date.
Time frame: 8.5 years
Quality of life will be measured by the FACTLym before start of treatment, during induction and maintenance.
Christian Buske
Other
Copanlisib and Rituximab in Marginal Zone Lymphoma Patients (COUP-1)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03162536
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03322865
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Bochum, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT02952508
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03452774
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details