Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01690416

Conventional vs Ultrasound Guided Arteria Cannulation.

The aim of the project is to compare two methods for arterial cannulation. The traditional method with ultrasound guided cannulation. The investigators goal is to improve this procedure to reduce pain and complications.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Aarhus Universitets Hospital

Aarhus, Jylland, 8200, Denmark

About this study

The practice of placing vascular catheters is used many times every day at almost every hospital. It is a safe procedure which generally does not imply problems. Though the procedural optimum aren't reached. The procedure still fails some times and induce complications. When the catheter is placed using the traditional method the pulse is palpated by the operator's fingers. This is only to be done near the hand wrist. In this position the catheter steadiness is fragile but because the pulse can't be sensed more proximal the operator is forced to choose this position. This it though a problem that can be solved by non invasive visualization technology. Ultrasound-guidance for central vascular access is already well-established. However, in recent years ultrasound-guidance for peripheral vascular access has gained popularity too. The evidence of multiple studies demonstrates increased success rate and reduced complication rate with ultrasound compared to blind landmark technique for vascular catheter placement.

In recent years there have been both procedural technique and technology improvements in the field of ultrasound. This has led to the improvement of procedural catheterisation techniques that now can be done by novices with higher attempt success rate than traditional method. One technique that is gaining success is the short-axis-out-of-plane technique (SAX-OOP) with dynamic-needle-tip-tracking (DNTT).Using the ultrasound machine the needle can be placed in a more proximal direction on the forearm and the investigators believe that by the help of the exposed procedure on the monitor many complications can be reduced.

It has been shown that inexperienced trainees lear the technique SAX-OOP and DNTT very quickly.

First investigators hypothesize that the number of attempts, the number of withdrawals, the time spend and the number of utilized catheters will be decreased using ultrasound vs. the traditional method. Secondly investigators hypothesize that the pain induced by the conventional method inclusive preoperational lidocaine injection will be the same or more intense than using DNTT with local anesthesia. Thirdly investigators claim that the best anatomical place to put the catheter isn't always corresponding with the spot chosen by palpation, which increase the number of failures. Fourthly investigators hypothesize that the use of ultrasound will increase the operator's subjective feeling of having accomplished a successful procedure.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 20-90 years
  • Fulfill the criteria of an operation
  • Routine need of an arterial needle

Exclusion criteria

  • Lack of patient consent
  • Ultrasound identified plaques in the radial artery or ultrasound verified compromised flow in either the radial or ulnar artery.

Treatment and study plan

Traditional palpation technique

Procedure

Ultrasound DNTP

Procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. Attempts

    Time frame: 1 hour

    The number of attempts (skin punctures) per catheterization

  2. Withdrawals

    Time frame: 1 hour

    The number of withdrawals of the guide-needle per catheterization

  3. Time consume

    Time frame: minutes

    The time spend for the catheterization procedure

  4. Catheters

    Time frame: 1 hour

    The number of utilized catheters

Secondary outcomes

  1. pain

    Time frame: momentan

    The pain induced by the conventional method inclusive preoperational lidocaine injection will be the same or more intense than using DNTT with local anesthesia measured on a VAS-score.

  2. Ease of method for the operator

    Time frame: momentan

    The use of ultrasound will increase the operator's subjective feeling of having accomplished a successful procedure on a Likert scale.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Conventional vs Ultrasound Guided Arteria Cannulation

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Sep 21, 2012
Registry last updated
May 12, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.