Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03199703

Conventional Versus RF Needle Transseptal Puncture for Cryoballoon Ablation

This will be a prospective single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of transseptal puncture using the Baylis transseptal system to transseptal left atrial access with standard transseptal equipment (usual care) in patients undergoing catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation with the cryoballoon system.

The targeted population will consist of patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with the cryoballoon system.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Study Objective - The objective of the prospective, randomized study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Baylis transseptal system (RF needle, TorFlex sheath, and specialised ProTrack guidewire) compared with a conventional transseptal (conventional sheath, Brockenbrough needle, and standard guidewire) for transseptal LA access during cryoballoon ablation procedures.

Trial design - This will be a prospective single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of transseptal puncture using the Baylis transseptal system to transseptal left atrial access with standard transseptal equipment (usual care) in patients undergoing catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation with the cryoballoon system.

Study Population - The targeted population will consist of patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with the cryoballoon system.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Non-permanent AF documented on a 12 lead ECG, Trans Telephonic Monitoring (TTM) or Holter monitor within the last 24 months
  • Age of 18 years or older on the date of consent
  • Candidate for ablation based on AF that is symptomatic
  • Informed Consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous left atrial (LA) ablation or LA surgery
  • AF due to reversible cause (e.g. hyperthyroidism, cardiothoracic surgery)
  • Active Intracardiac Thrombus
  • Pre-existing pulmonary vein stenosis or PV stent
  • Pre-existing hemidiaphragmatic paralysis
  • Contraindication to anticoagulation or radiocontrast materials
  • Left atrial anteroposterior diameter greater than 5.5 cm by transthoracic echocardiography
  • Cardiac valve prosthesis
  • Clinically significant (moderately-severe, or severe) mitral valve regurgitation or stenosis
  • Myocardial infarction, PCI / PTCA, or coronary artery stenting during the 3-month period preceding the consent date
  • Cardiac surgery during the three-month interval preceding the consent date
  • Significant congenital heart defect (including atrial septal defects or PV abnormalities but not including PFO)
  • NYHA class III or IV congestive heart failure
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35%
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (septal or posterior wall thickness >1.5 cm)
  • Significant Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD - eGFR <30 µMol/L)
  • Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism
  • Cerebral ischemic event (strokes or TIAs) during the six-month interval preceding the consent date
  • Pregnancy
  • Life expectancy less than one (1) year
  • Currently participating or anticipated to participate in any other clinical trial of a drug, device or biologic that has the potential to interfere with the results of this study
  • Unwilling or unable to comply fully with study procedures and follow-up

Treatment and study plan

Baylis transseptal system group

Device

Standard conventional transseptal group

Device

Primary outcomes

  1. Total time required for left atrial access

    Time frame: Intraprocedural assessment (within 24 hours)

    defined as time from the first pull-down of the needle/sheath/dilator apparatus in the superior vena cava to first entrance of the cryoballoon into the left atrium.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Transeptal Access

    Time frame: Intraprocedural assessment (within 24 hours)

    Success/failure of the assigned transseptal apparatus to achieve transeptal puncture (proportion of patients necessitating the use of the alternate study apparatus - e.g. cross-over from the NRG RF needle to the to conventional BRK needle)

  2. Plastic Shavings

    Time frame: Intraprocedural assessment of visible plastic shavings (within 24 hours)

    Proportion of cases whereby the presence (or absence) of visible plastic dilator shavings from needle introduction are seen

  3. The proportion of patients sustaining a procedural complication plausibly related to transseptal puncture

    Time frame: Acute peri-procedural complications will be defined as occurring within 30 days of ablation

    Events include pericardial effusion, pericardial tamponade, cardiac perforation, air embolism, aortic root puncture

  4. Transseptal time - septal engagement to sheath advancement

    Time frame: Intraprocedural assessment (measured in seconds)

    Time from inter-atrial septum engagement with the transseptal needle to FlexCath sheath advancement into the LA

  5. Transseptal time - left atrial access to sheath positioning

    Time frame: Intraprocedural assessment (measured in seconds)

    Time from needle advancement through the septum to sheath advancement into the LA

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Jason Andrade

Other

Collaborators

  • Baylis Medical Company

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Trial of Conventional Versus Radiofrequency Needle Transseptal Puncture for Cryoballoon Ablation

Acronym: CRYO-LATS

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jun 27, 2017
Registry last updated
Dec 8, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.