NCT Number: NCT03199703
Conventional Versus RF Needle Transseptal Puncture for Cryoballoon Ablation
This will be a prospective single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of transseptal puncture using the Baylis transseptal system to transseptal left atrial access with standard transseptal equipment (usual care) in patients undergoing catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation with the cryoballoon system.
The targeted population will consist of patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with the cryoballoon system.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
About this study
Study Objective - The objective of the prospective, randomized study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Baylis transseptal system (RF needle, TorFlex sheath, and specialised ProTrack guidewire) compared with a conventional transseptal (conventional sheath, Brockenbrough needle, and standard guidewire) for transseptal LA access during cryoballoon ablation procedures.
Trial design - This will be a prospective single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of transseptal puncture using the Baylis transseptal system to transseptal left atrial access with standard transseptal equipment (usual care) in patients undergoing catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation with the cryoballoon system.
Study Population - The targeted population will consist of patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with the cryoballoon system.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Non-permanent AF documented on a 12 lead ECG, Trans Telephonic Monitoring (TTM) or Holter monitor within the last 24 months
- Age of 18 years or older on the date of consent
- Candidate for ablation based on AF that is symptomatic
- Informed Consent
Exclusion criteria
- Previous left atrial (LA) ablation or LA surgery
- AF due to reversible cause (e.g. hyperthyroidism, cardiothoracic surgery)
- Active Intracardiac Thrombus
- Pre-existing pulmonary vein stenosis or PV stent
- Pre-existing hemidiaphragmatic paralysis
- Contraindication to anticoagulation or radiocontrast materials
- Left atrial anteroposterior diameter greater than 5.5 cm by transthoracic echocardiography
- Cardiac valve prosthesis
- Clinically significant (moderately-severe, or severe) mitral valve regurgitation or stenosis
- Myocardial infarction, PCI / PTCA, or coronary artery stenting during the 3-month period preceding the consent date
- Cardiac surgery during the three-month interval preceding the consent date
- Significant congenital heart defect (including atrial septal defects or PV abnormalities but not including PFO)
- NYHA class III or IV congestive heart failure
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35%
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (septal or posterior wall thickness >1.5 cm)
- Significant Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD - eGFR <30 µMol/L)
- Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism
- Cerebral ischemic event (strokes or TIAs) during the six-month interval preceding the consent date
- Pregnancy
- Life expectancy less than one (1) year
- Currently participating or anticipated to participate in any other clinical trial of a drug, device or biologic that has the potential to interfere with the results of this study
- Unwilling or unable to comply fully with study procedures and follow-up
Treatment and study plan
Standard conventional transseptal group
DevicePrimary outcomes
-
Total time required for left atrial access
Time frame: Intraprocedural assessment (within 24 hours)
defined as time from the first pull-down of the needle/sheath/dilator apparatus in the superior vena cava to first entrance of the cryoballoon into the left atrium.
Secondary outcomes
-
Transeptal Access
Time frame: Intraprocedural assessment (within 24 hours)
Success/failure of the assigned transseptal apparatus to achieve transeptal puncture (proportion of patients necessitating the use of the alternate study apparatus - e.g. cross-over from the NRG RF needle to the to conventional BRK needle)
-
Plastic Shavings
Time frame: Intraprocedural assessment of visible plastic shavings (within 24 hours)
Proportion of cases whereby the presence (or absence) of visible plastic dilator shavings from needle introduction are seen
-
The proportion of patients sustaining a procedural complication plausibly related to transseptal puncture
Time frame: Acute peri-procedural complications will be defined as occurring within 30 days of ablation
Events include pericardial effusion, pericardial tamponade, cardiac perforation, air embolism, aortic root puncture
-
Transseptal time - septal engagement to sheath advancement
Time frame: Intraprocedural assessment (measured in seconds)
Time from inter-atrial septum engagement with the transseptal needle to FlexCath sheath advancement into the LA
-
Transseptal time - left atrial access to sheath positioning
Time frame: Intraprocedural assessment (measured in seconds)
Time from needle advancement through the septum to sheath advancement into the LA
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Jason Andrade
Other
Collaborators
- Baylis Medical Company
Registry information
Official study title
Randomized Trial of Conventional Versus Radiofrequency Needle Transseptal Puncture for Cryoballoon Ablation
Acronym: CRYO-LATS
Important dates
- Study start
- 2017
- Primary completion
- 2019
- Study completion
- 2020
- First posted
- Jun 27, 2017
- Registry last updated
- Dec 8, 2020
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Improving How Older Adults at Risk for Cardiovascular Outcomes Are Selected for Care Coordination
NCT05820295
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsEffect of Sodium Glucose Co-transporter 2 Inhibitors on Left Atrial Remodeling
NCT05993897
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Aswān, Aswan Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsA Study of Stellate Ganglion Block for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation
NCT05357690
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsThe Norwegian Exercise in Atrial Fibrillation Trial
NCT05164718
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Drammen, Norway
View Trial Details