Anæstesiologisk-Intensiv afdeling I
Aarhus, Jylland, 8200, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT01561196
The aim of the project is to compare two methods for arterial cannulation. The traditional method with ultrasound guided cannulation. The investigators goal is to improve this procedure to reduce pain and complications.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–90 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Aarhus, Jylland, 8200, Denmark
The practice of placing vascular catheters is used many times every day at almost every hospital. It is a safe procedure which generally does not imply problems. Though the procedural optimum aren't reached. The procedure still fails some times and induce complications. When the catheter is placed using the traditional method the pulse is palpated by the operator's fingers. This is only to be done near the hand wrist. In this position the catheter steadiness is fragile but because the pulse can't be sensed more proximal the operator is forced to choose this position. This it though a problem that can be solved by non invasive visualization technology. Ultrasound-guidance for central vascular access is already well-established. However, in recent years ultrasound-guidance for peripheral vascular access has gained popularity too. The evidence of multiple studies demonstrates increased success rate and reduced complication rate with ultrasound compared to blind landmark technique for vascular catheter placement.
In recent years there have been both procedural technique and technology improvements in the field of ultrasound. This has led to the improvement of procedural catheterisation techniques that now can be done by novices with higher attempt success rate than traditional method. One technique that is gaining success is the short-axis-out-of-plane technique (SAX-OOP) with dynamic-needle-tip-tracking (DNTT).Using the ultrasound machine the needle can be placed in a more proximal direction on the forearm and the investigators believe that by the help of the exposed procedure on the monitor many complications can be reduced.
Hypothesis; Firstly the investigators hypothesize that the pain induced by the conventional method inclusive preoperational lidocaine injection will be the same or more intense than using DNTT without local anesthesia. Secondly the investigators hypothesize that the use of DNTT for the placement of the arterial catheter will decrease the time spend, amount of complications (hematoma), the number of pricks, the number of utilized catheters compared to the traditional palpation method. Thirdly the investigators claim that the best anatomical place to put the catheter isn't always corresponding with the spot chosen by palpation, which increase the number of failures.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
arterial catheterisation in Arterial Radialis
Other names: ICD10 I95.9
Time frame: 5 minutes
The primary outcome is the subjective feeling of pain following the two methods.
Time frame: 1 day
Time will be measured from the point where 1) the operator starts searching for the patients plus or 2) the operator starts examining the patient with the ultrasound machine. The time will be stopped at the time where the catheter is successfully placed.
Time frame: 1 day
Time frame: 1 day
a prick is defined as eruption of the skin
Time frame: 1 day
a withdrawal is defined as backwards movement of the needle or the needle+catheter.
Marlene A Hansen, Stud.med
Other
Conventional vs. Ultrasound Guided Arteria Cannulation, With and Without Local Anesthesia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01715376
Angina Pectoris, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Changchun, Jilin, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07736066
Cardiac Rehabilitation, Cardiac Surgery
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT01952171
Cardiovascular Abnormalities, Cardiovascular Diseases
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01498276
Cancer, Cardiovascular Diseases
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial Details