NCT Number: NCT00003724
Conventional or Video-Assisted Surgery in Treating Patients With Lung Metastases
RATIONALE: Video-assisted surgery may have fewer side effects than conventional surgery in patients with lung metastases. It is not yet known whether conventional surgery or video-assisted surgery is more effective in treating lung metastases.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of conventional surgery with that of video-assisted surgery in treating patients who have lung metastases.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary location
University of California San Diego Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, United States
About this study
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the overall survival and failure free survival of patients with isolated pulmonary metastases treated with minimally invasive (video assisted) resection or open resection. II. Compare patterns of recurrence in these patients after these treatments, and determine what factors are predictive of recurrence. III. Describe and compare the complications and morbidity associated with minimally-invasive and open approaches to metastasectomy in these patients. IV. Test whether the patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery will have a significantly better quality of life over a six month period than those undergoing an open resection.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified according to histology (sarcoma vs epithelial vs germ cell vs melanoma) and disease laterality. After spiral CT showing pulmonary nodules are amenable to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) resection with curative intent, patients are randomized to undergo either open resection (thoracotomy, median sternotomy, or bilateral sternothoracotomy) (arm I) or minimally-invasive video-assisted resection (arm II). Patients with isolated recurrence in the chest should have the recurrence(s) resected if feasible. The original resection approach (open versus VATS) should be the preferred method for the second resection, but is not required. Quality of life is assessed prior to randomization and then at 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months. Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: There will be 530 patients accrued into this study in approximately 3 years.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically confirmed pulmonary metastases (unilateral or bilateral) identified by spiral CT scan No primary lung cancer Documented previous cancer with no history of prior metastasectomy Primary tumor must be definitively controlled No evidence of primary tumor recurrence, either locally or systemically No extrapulmonary metastatic disease or evidence of mediastinal lymph node involvement Lymph nodes greater than 1.0 cm on CT scan must be proven to be benign by tissue biopsy (mediastinoscopy) All lesions must be amenable to minimally invasive resection Must be amenable to video-assisted thoracic surgery with curative intent (complete removal of all documented lesions) No greater than 4 lesions
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: Over 18 Performance status: CALGB 0-2 Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: Not specified Hepatic: Not specified Renal: Not specified Pulmonary: See Disease Characteristics
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: Not specified Endocrine therapy: Not specified Radiotherapy: Not specified Surgery: See Disease Characteristics
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
overall survival
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Secondary outcomes
-
recurrence free survival
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Other
Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Registry information
Official study title
Phase III Randomized Prospective Trial of Open Versus Minimally Invasive, Video-Assisted Resection of Pulmonary Metastases
Important dates
- Study start
- 1999
- Primary completion
- 2007
- Study completion
- 2007
- First posted
- May 21, 2004
- Registry last updated
- Jul 12, 2016
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Study of Avutometinib (VS-6766) + Adagrasib in KRAS G12C NSCLC Patients
NCT05375994
Advanced Cancer, Bronchial Neoplasms
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsDurvalumab (MEDI4736) With Cetuximab in Previously Treated Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
NCT03691714
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Neoplasms
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsMedico-economic Evaluation Comparing the Impact of the New Fixed-dose Nivolumab Regimen With the Old mg/kg Regimen in the Management of Patients With Metastatic Cancer
NCT05380336
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Nantes, France
View Trial DetailsPredicting Disease Progression and/or Recurrence in Cancer
NCT04776837
Biliary Tract Cancer, Biliary Tract Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details