Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy
RadiationUndergo hypofractionated radiation therapy
Other names: Hypofractionated, Hypofractionated Radiotherapy, hypofractionation, Radiation, Hypofractionated
NCT Number: NCT03987386
This phase III trial studies how well hypofractionated radiation therapy works compared to the conventional one in treating patients with prostate cancer. Radiation therapy uses high energy beams to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Hypofractionated radiation therapy delivers higher doses of radiation therapy over a shorter period of time and may kill more tumor cells and have fewer side effects.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Phase 3
M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To assess the gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities in patients treated with hypo-fractionated postoperative radiotherapy relative to the conventional postoperative radiotherapy.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To report patient outcome to include local control, loco-regional control, distant metastases, biochemical progression-free survival, prostate-cancer specific survival (PCSS), time to salvage therapy.
Ia. To compare freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) and time to progression (TTP) with definition of post prostatectomy nadir + 2 ng/mL in both treatment arms.
II. To evaluate patient reported quality of life outcomes with hypo-fractionated compared to standard fractionated postoperative radiotherapy using validated surveys (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite [EPIC]-26, Short Form [SF]-12, EuroQol 5 dimensional [EQ-5D]) and use of erectile dysfunction medications/devices.
III. To compare patient reported GU symptoms using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5 (specifically GU symptoms) and quality of life reports with EPIC-26, SF-12, EQ-5D survey at end of radiation therapy (RT), 6, 12, 24 and up to 60 months from the end of radiation therapy.
IV. To compare patient reported GI symptoms using CTCAE version 5 (specifically GI symptoms) and quality of life reports with the EPIC-26 SF-12, EQ-5D survey at end of RT, 6, 12, 24, and up to 60 months from the end of radiation therapy.
V. To report health economics with cost and time based driven activity (TDABC) in delivering shorter hypofractionated courses of radiotherapy compared to standard course (indirect and direct cost).
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients undergo conventional radiation therapy daily over 7 weeks after standard of care surgery.
ARM II: Patients undergo hypofractionated radiation therapy over 4.5 weeks after standard of care surgery.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 3-6 months, and then every 6-12 months for up to 5 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo hypofractionated radiation therapy
Other names: Hypofractionated, Hypofractionated Radiotherapy, hypofractionation, Radiation, Hypofractionated
Ancillary studies
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Undergo conventional radiation therapy
Other names: Cancer Radiotherapy, ENERGY_TYPE, Irradiate, Irradiated, Irradiation, Radiation, Radiation Therapy, NOS, Radiotherapeutics, Radiotherapy, RT, Therapy, Radiation
Time frame: At 2 years
Will be denoted as Tc and Te for conventional and hypo-fractionated arm respectively.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test will be used to assess the differences in time-to-event outcomes between the two groups. Cox proportional hazards model will be fit to compare the two arms while accounting for other patient characteristics.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test will be used to assess the differences in time-to-event outcomes between the two groups. Cox proportional hazards model will be fit to compare the two arms while accounting for other patient characteristics.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test will be used to assess the differences in time-to-event outcomes between the two groups. Cox proportional hazards model will be fit to compare the two arms while accounting for other patient characteristics.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will be defined as post prostatectomy nadir + 2 ng/mL in both treatment arms. Will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test will be used to assess the differences in time-to-event outcomes between the two groups. Cox proportional hazards model will be fit to compare the two arms while accounting for other patient characteristics.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will evaluate patient reported quality of life outcomes with hypo-fractionated compared to standard fractionated postoperative radiotherapy using validated surveys (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite [EPIC]-26, Short Form [SF]-12) and use of erectile dysfunction medications/devices. Will be summarized using descriptive statistics by treatment arm and will be compared using two sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test as appropriate.
Time frame: At end of radiation therapy (RT), 6, 12, 24 and up to 60 months from the end of RT
Will be assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5. Will be compared to quality of life reports with EPIC-26, SF-12, EQ-5D survey. Quality of life (QOL) data will be summarized using descriptive statistics by treatment arm and will be compared using two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test as appropriate. The generalized estimating equations (GEE) model will be fit to assess the change of GU or GI symptoms over time as well as treatment effect.
Time frame: At end of RT, 6, 12, 24, and up to 60 months from the end of RT
Will be assessed by CTCAE version 5. Will be compared to quality of life reports with EPIC-26, SF-12, EQ-5D survey. QOL data will be summarized using descriptive statistics by treatment arm and will be compared using two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test as appropriate. The GEE model will be fit to assess the change of GU or GI symptoms over time as well as treatment effect.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will report health economics with cost and time based driven activity (TDABC) in delivering shorter hypofractionated courses of radiotherapy compared to standard course (indirect and direct cost). Will be summarized using descriptive statistics by treatment arm and will be compared using two sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test as appropriate.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Other
Post Operative External Beam Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Randomized Trial Comparing Standard vs. Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy (PORT-HYFX)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04134260
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05722288
Colorectal Neoplasms, Digestive System Diseases
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06389786
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05838716
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Newark, Delaware, United States
View Trial Details