Nationwide Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43205, United States
NCT Number: NCT07474415
This study evaluates whether gastric electrical stimulation (GES) improves symptoms in children with severe nausea and vomiting that have not responded to standard treatments. GES is a therapy that delivers small electrical pulses to the stomach to help improve stomach function and reduce symptoms. In this study, children underwent temporary gastric electrical stimulation using a pacing lead placed through a nasogastric tube. The stimulation device was turned OFF for four days and then ON for four days, while participants remained blinded to the stimulation status. Symptoms and tolerance to oral nutrient intake were measured at baseline and during each study phase. The goal of the study was to determine whether active stimulation improves symptoms and nutrient intake compared with the sham period.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeUp to 21 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Columbus, Ohio, 43205, United States
Children and adolescents with severe nausea and vomiting that do not respond to medical therapy represent a challenging clinical population. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) has been used as a treatment option for patients with refractory symptoms, but controlled trials in children are limited.
This single-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial evaluated the short-term effects of temporary gastric electrical stimulation in pediatric patients with refractory nausea and vomiting. Participants underwent placement of a temporary pacing lead through a nasogastric tube connected to an external stimulator. After placement, the stimulator remained OFF for the first four days followed by ON for the next four days. Participants were blinded to the stimulation status.
Baseline data included demographic characteristics, medical history, nutritional status, and symptom assessments using the Symptom Monitor Worksheet (SMW). Participants also completed a nutrient drink test to evaluate tolerance to oral intake. Symptom scores and nutrient drink test volumes were reassessed at the end of each study phase.
The primary objective of the study was to evaluate changes in nausea and vomiting symptoms during sham and active stimulation phases. Secondary objectives included evaluating changes in symptom severity and frequency across gastrointestinal symptoms and assessing tolerance to nutrient intake during the study periods.
This study aims to better understand whether gastric electrical stimulation may improve symptoms and oral intake in children with refractory nausea and vomiting and to inform future therapeutic approaches for this population.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants underwent placement of a temporary gastric pacing lead through a nasogastric tube connected to an external gastric electrical stimulator. The device was used to deliver gastric electrical stimulation during the active phase of the study. During the sham phase the device remained OFF, while during the active phase electrical stimulation was delivered to the stomach. The intervention was used to evaluate the effects of gastric electrical stimulation on symptoms of nausea and vomiting and tolerance to oral nutrient intake in children with refractory symptoms.
Other names: Gastric pacing, Temporary gastric stimulation, Gastric electrical neuromodulation
Time frame: Baseline, Day 5 (end of sham phase), and Day 9 (end of active stimulation phase)
The Symptom Monitor Worksheet (SMW) is used to assess frequency and severity of upper gastrointestinal symptoms, including nausea and vomiting. SMW scores were collected at baseline, at the end of the sham phase (stimulator OFF), and at the end of the active stimulation phase (stimulator ON) to evaluate changes in symptoms during gastric electrical stimulation.
Time frame: Baseline, end of sham phase (Day 5), and end of active stimulation phase (Day 9)
The nutrient drink test measures tolerance to oral nutrient intake. Participants consumed a standardized nutrient liquid until reaching maximum tolerated fullness. The maximum tolerated volume (mL) was recorded at baseline, at the end of the sham phase (stimulator OFF), and at the end of the active stimulation phase (stimulator ON) to evaluate changes in gastric tolerance associated with gastric electrical stimulation.
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Other
Prospective, Controlled Trial of Gastric Electrical Stimulation in Children With Nausea and Vomiting
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04028492
Diabetic Gastroparesis, Digestive System Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03178370
Abdominal Pain, Digestive System Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT01149369
Digestive System Diseases, Gastrointestinal Diseases
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01643577
Abdominal Pain, Digestive System Diseases
Lutherville, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details