Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02120781

Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Azficel-T for Vocal Fold Scarring and Age-Related Dysphonia

The objectives of this study are to assess the safety of azficel-T treatment for dysphonia related to vocal fold function and to evaluate the efficacy of azficel-T for the treatment of dysphonia related to vocal fold function.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Surgery/Head and Neck, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Twenty subjects with dysphonia caused by vocal fold scarring or age-related dysphonia will be randomized for treatment with autologous cultured fibroblasts (azficel-T, n=14) or placebo (saline, n=6). Subjects will receive treatment to the vocal fold(s) in the lamina propria compartment.

Subjects with both unilateral and bilateral vocal fold scarring will be treated in this study. Only one vocal fold will be treated at each treatment session alternating to the opposite vocal fold (if applicable) at the next treatment. Subjects are to receive a total of three treatments with study drug (azficel-T or placebo) if one vocal fold is to be treated and up to a total of six treatments with study drug (azficel-T or placebo) if two vocal folds are to be treated at approximately 2-week intervals. Follow-up examinations will be performed at 1, 4, 8, and 12 months after the final treatment. If there are any evident safety issues, follow-up treatments will be delayed or withheld.

In the Blinded Phase of the study, subjects will be followed for safety and efficacy for 4 months after the final treatment. After all subjects have completed the 4-month follow-up visit, the study will be unblinded and subjects will continue to be followed for safety for 12 months after the final treatment. Efficacy assessments will be made through the 12-month follow-up visit in order to document any duration of effect. All AEs that have an onset date from biopsy through the 4-month follow-up visit will be recorded.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject has read and signed the Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved informed consent form (ICF) before treatment
  • Subject is at least 18 years of age
  • Subject has presence of unilateral or bilateral vocal fold scarring or age-related dysphonia, as diagnosed by medical history and physical examination
  • Subject must have Grade 1-2 mucosal waves as determined by videostroboscopy
  • Subject has failed any one or more of the following treatments including, but not limited to, anti-reflux regimen, speech therapy, or vocal fold injection augmentation prior to screening
  • Subject feels that their voice quality is a major handicap
  • Subject must have a blood sample tested and found to be non-reactive for human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) antibody, hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody
  • If the subject is female and of childbearing potential, she must agree to use a medically acceptable means of birth control, and test negative on a urine pregnancy test
  • Subject must be willing and able to follow study procedures and instructions

Exclusion criteria

  • Subject is pregnant or lactating
  • Subject is a smoker
  • Subject has an upper respiratory infection at baseline (subject can be rescheduled after four weeks)
  • Subject is already participating, or has participated in another clinical trial involving therapeutic intervention within 30 days prior to enrollment
  • Subject plans to begin or continue other vocal fold therapies during the course of this study
  • Subject has other concurrent laryngeal pathology including lesions that would require removal

Treatment and study plan

Azficel-T (autologous fibroblasts)

Biological

Autologous fibroblasts will be cultured from three 3-mm post auricular punch biopsies. Biopsies will be shipped from the clinical sites to the Fibrocell manufacturing site where the cells will be harvested, tested for sterility, endotoxin level, cell identity, viability and concentration. When the desired cell number is reached, cells will be transported to the investigative site as a suspension in shipping media.

Depending upon the clinical circumstances for each subject, the vocal fold(s) will be injected transorally or percutaneously in order to deposit 1.0 mL of study drug into the lamina propria layer of each vocal fold. The injection process will be visualized via a flexible fiberoptic laryngoscope inserted through the nostril.

Other names: LAVIV™

Placebo

Drug

Subjects randomized to placebo will receive injections of sterile saline into the vocal fold(s).

Other names: Sterile saline for injection

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Any Improvement From Baseline in Mucosal Wave Grade

    Time frame: Four months after final treatment, or up to a total of 25 weeks from baseline with unilateral treatment and 27 weeks from baseline for bilateral treatment

    Any improvement from baseline in mucosal wave grade using videostrobscopy to assess the pliability of vocal folds which is visualized as mucosal waves on the vocal fold surface while a participant is phonating a sustained vowel sound.

  2. Number of Participants With an Absolute Change in Voice Handicap Index Score (Decrease of 18 or More Points) From Baseline

    Time frame: Four months after final treatment, or up to a total of 25 weeks from baseline with unilateral treatment and 27 weeks from baseline for bilateral treatment

    Absolute change (decrease by 18 or more points) from baseline in the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) score 4 months after the final treatment.

    The VHI is a 30-item test with 10 items in 3 subscales: emotional, physical, and functional. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale: "0" indicating the subject never felt this about the voice problem and "4" indicating the subject always felt this to be the case. An 8-point difference on any subscale (sub-scale range 0-40, higher values represent worse outcomes) has been found to be significant, as was an 18-point difference in the total VHI score (Total scale range 0-120, higher values represent worse outcomes).

  3. Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Voice Handicap Index Score

    Time frame: Four months after final treatment, or up to a total of 25 weeks from baseline with unilateral treatment and 27 weeks from baseline for bilateral treatment

    Mean percentage change from baseline in the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) score 4 months after the final treatment. The VHI is a 30-item test with 10 items in 3 subscales: emotional, physical, and functional. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale: "0" indicating the subject never felt this about the voice problem and "4" indicating the subject always felt this to be the case. An 8-point difference on any subscale (sub-scale range 0-40, higher values represent worse outcomes) has been found to be significant, as was an 18-point difference in the total VHI score (Total scale range 0-120, higher values represent worse outcomes).

  4. Number of Participants With at Least One Level of Improvement in Perceptual Analysis of Dysphonia Using GRBAS Scale.

    Time frame: Four months after final treatment, or up to a total of 25 weeks from baseline with unilateral treatment and 27 weeks from baseline for bilateral treatment

    Perceptual analysis of dysphonia using the Grade of Dysphonia, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain (GRBAS) scale is assessed by a blinded voice clinician 4 months after the final treatment. The voice clinician considers pre- and post-treatment voice recordings, and categorizes the individual parameters on the GRBAS scale (absent, mild, moderate, and severe). Scores of mild, moderate, or severe represent increasingly worse outcomes than a score of absent.

  5. Number of Participants With at Least One Level of Improvement in Perceptual Analysis of Roughness Using GRBAS Scale.

    Time frame: Four months after final treatment, or up to a total of 25 weeks from baseline with unilateral treatment and 27 weeks from baseline for bilateral treatment

    Perceptual analysis of roughness using the Grade of Dysphonia, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain (GRBAS) scale is assessed by a blinded voice clinician 4 months after the final treatment. The voice clinician considers pre- and post-treatment voice recordings, and categorizes the individual parameters on the GRBAS scale (absent, mild, moderate, and severe). Scores of mild, moderate, or severe represent increasingly worse outcomes than a score of absent.

  6. Number of Participants With at Least One Level of Improvement in Perceptual Analysis of Breathiness Using GRBAS Scale.

    Time frame: Four months after final treatment, or up to a total of 25 weeks from baseline with unilateral treatment and 27 weeks from baseline for bilateral treatment

    Perceptual analysis of breathiness using the Grade of Dysphonia, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain (GRBAS) scale is assessed by a blinded voice clinician 4 months after the final treatment. The voice clinician considers pre- and post-treatment voice recordings, and categorizes the individual parameters on the GRBAS scale (absent, mild, moderate, and severe). Scores of mild, moderate, or severe represent increasingly worse outcomes than a score of absent.

  7. Number of Participants With at Least One Level of Improvement in Perceptual Analysis of Asthenia Using GRBAS Scale.

    Time frame: Four months after final treatment, or up to a total of 25 weeks from baseline with unilateral treatment and 27 weeks from baseline for bilateral treatment

    Perceptual analysis of asthenia using the Grade of Dysphonia, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain (GRBAS) scale is assessed by a blinded voice clinician 4 months after the final treatment. The voice clinician considers pre- and post-treatment voice recordings, and categorizes the individual parameters on the GRBAS scale (absent, mild, moderate, and severe). Scores of mild, moderate, or severe represent increasingly worse outcomes than a score of absent.

  8. Number of Participants With at Least One Level of Improvement in Perceptual Analysis of Strain Using GRBAS Scale.

    Time frame: Four months after final treatment, or up to a total of 25 weeks from baseline with unilateral treatment and 27 weeks from baseline for bilateral treatment

    Perceptual analysis of strain using the Grade of Dysphonia, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain (GRBAS) scale is assessed by a blinded voice clinician 4 months after the final treatment. The voice clinician considers pre- and post-treatment voice recordings, and categorizes the individual parameters on the GRBAS scale (absent, mild, moderate, and severe). Scores of mild, moderate, or severe represent increasingly worse outcomes than a score of absent.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Castle Creek Biosciences, LLC.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Azficel-T for the Treatment of Vocal Fold Scarring and Age-Related Dysphonia

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Apr 23, 2014
Registry last updated
Jun 3, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.